Screening for glaucoma in a general population with the non-mydriatic fundus camera and the frequency doubling perimeter

European Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 387-393

  Detry Morel, M ^a   Zeyen, T ^b   Kestelyn, P ^c   Collignon, J ^d   Goethals, M ^b  

^a CLINIQUES UNIVERSITAIRES SAINT LUC   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Frequency doubling perimetry; Frequency doubling technology; Glaucoma epidemiology; Glaucoma screening; Intraocular pressure; Optic disc imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BELGIUM; CAMERA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITALIZATION; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DOUBLING PERIMETER; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MEASUREMENT; NON MYDRIATRIC FUNDUS CAMERA; OBSERVER VARIATION; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC DISK ANOMALY; PERIMETER; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; TONOMETER; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 8344268558     PISSN: 11206721     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112067210401400505     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Hitchings RA. Glaucoma screening. Br J Ophthalmol 1993; 77: 326.
2. Quigley HA. Current and future approaches to glaucoma screening. J Glaucoma 1998; 7: 210-20.
3. Tielsch JM. Screening for glaucoma: a continuing dilemma. In: Ball SF, Franklin RM, eds. Transactions of the New Orleans Academy of Ophthalmology. Amsterdam: Keigler, 1993; 1-11.
4. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Singh K, et al. A population-based evaluation of glaucoma screening: The Baltimore Eye Survey. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 134: 1102-10.
5. Vitale S, Smith SD, Quigley HA, et al. Screening performance of functional and structural measurements of neural damage in open-angle glaucoma:, a case-control study from the Baltimore Eye Survey. J Glaucoma 2000; 9: 346-56.
6. Tuulonen A, Airaksinen PJ, Montagna A, Nieminen H. Screening for glaucoma with a non-mydriatic fundus camera. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1990; 68: 445-9.
7. Niessen AG, Langerhorst CT, Geijssen HC, Greve EL. Design of low cost glaucoma screening. Doc Ophthalmol 1997; 93: 293-315.
8. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger BS, Green WR. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; 107: 453-64.
9. Maddess T, Henry GH. Performance of nonlinear visual units in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Clin Vision Sci 1992; 7: 371-93.
10. White AJR, Sun H, Swanson WH, Lee BB. An examination of physiological mechanisms underlying the frequency-doubling illusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 3590-9.
11. Quigley HA. Identification of glaucomatous visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency-doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 1998; 125: 819-29.
12. Yamada N, Chen PP, Mills RP, et al. Screening for glaucoma with frequency-doubling technology and Damato campimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 1999; 117: 1479-84.
13. Quaranta GM, Vetrugno M, Trabucco T, et al. The role of frequency doubling technology (FDT) in glaucoma screening. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000; 21-3.
14. Alward WL. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 129: 376-8.
15. Cello KE, Nelson-Quigg JM, Johnson CA. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 129: 314-22.
16. Mansberger SL, Johnson CA, Cioffi CA, et al. Screening for glaucoma in India with the frequency doubling perimetry test. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 2154.
17. Van de Velde, Zeyen T. Reliability of the Nidek NT-1000 non contact tonometer. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 1994; 255: 17-20.
18. Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted kappa and the interclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas 1973; 33: 613-9.
19. Klein BEK, Klein R, Sponsel WE, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1992; 99: 1499-504.
20. The European Glaucoma Prevention Study (EGPS) Group. The European Glaucoma Prevention Study. Design and baseline description of the participants. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 1612-21.
21. Leske MC. The epidemiology of open-angle glaucoma: a review. Am J Epidemiol 1983; 118: 166-91.
22. Dielemans I, Vingerling JR, Wolfs RC, et al. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in a population based study in the Netherlands. The Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology 1994; 101: 1851-5.
23. Bonomi LK, Marchini G, Maeaffa M, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma and intraocular pressure distribution in a defined population. The Egna-Neumarkt Study. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 209-15.
24. Wensor MD, McCarty CA, Stanislavsky YL. The prevalence of glaucoma in the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 733-9.
25. Johnson CA, Wall M, Fingeret M. Primer for frequency doubling technology. Dublin, CA: Welch Allyn, 1998; 15-7.
26. Khong JJ, Dimitrov PN, Rait BJ, McCarty CA. Can the specificity of the FDT for glaucoma be improved by confirming abnormal results? J Glaucoma 2001; 10: 199-202.
27. Burnstein Y, Ellish NJ, Magbalon M, Higginbotham EJ. Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with Humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 129: 328-33.
28. Casson R, James B, Rubinstein A, Ali HA. Clinical comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and Humphrey perimetry. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 360-2.
29. North RV, Wild JM, Hunter E, Jones AL, Morgan JE. Evaluation of the high-specificity screening program (C-20-1) of the frequency doubling technology (FDT) perimeter in a clinical practice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 2167.
30. Paczka JA, Friedman DS, Quigley HA, Barron Y, Vitale S. Diagnostic capabilities of frequency-doubling technology, scanning laser polarimetry, and nerve fiber layer photographs to distinguish glaucomatous damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2001; 131: 188-97.
31. Patel SC, Friedman DS, Varadkar P, Robin AL. Algorithm for interpreting the results of frequency doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 129: 323-7.
32. Trible JR, Schultz RO, Robinson JC, et al. Accuracy of glaucoma detection with frequency-doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 129: 740-5.
33. Fabré K, Michiels I, Zeyen T. The sensitivity and specificity of TOP, FDP and GDX in screening for early glaucoma. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 2000; 275: 17-23.
34. Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, Singh K. Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black Americans. The Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch Ophthalmol 1991; 109: 1090-5.