Merton and Ziman's modes of science: The case of biological and similar material transfer agreements

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 355-363

  Rodriguez, Victor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; MODELING;

EID: 34548674456     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234207X228575     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adam, M, M Carrier and T Wilholt 2006. How to serve the customer and still be truthful: Methodological characteristics of applied research. Science and Public Policy, 33, 435-444.
2. Arrow, K 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, ed. R Nelson, Princeton NJ: The Princeton University Press.
3. Bailyn, L 1985. Autonomy in the industrial R&D lab. Human Resource Management, 24, 129-146.
4. Bayh, B 2006. Bayh-Dole: Don't turn back the clock. Les Nouvelles, 41, 215-218.
5. Barton, J 2001. Patents in genomics and basic research: Issues for global health. Commission on Macroeconomics and Health Working Paper Series. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
6. Campbell, E, B Clarridge, M Gokhale, L Birenbaum, S Hilgartner, N Holtzman and D Blumenthal 2002. Data withholding in academic genetics: Evidence from a national survey. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 473-480.
7. Carayol, N and J Dalle 2004. Sequential problem choice and the reward system in open science. Unpublished manuscript.
8. Dasgupta, P and P David 1994. Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23, 487-521.
9. Debackere, K and M Rappa 1994. Institutional variations in problem choice and persistence among scientists in an emerging field. Research Policy, 23, 425-441.
10. Eisenberg, R 2001. Bargaining over the transfer of proprietary research tools. In Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property, eds. R Dreyfuss, D Zimmerman and H First. New York NY: Oxford University Press.
11. Elzinga, A 1997. From Arrhenius to megascienoe: Interplay between science and public decisionmaking. Ambio, 26, 72-80.
12. Enserink, M 1999. NIH proposes rules for materials exchange. Science, 284, 1445.
13. Enzing, C, A van der Giessen and S Kern 2004. Commercialisation of biotechnology: Do dedicated public policies matter? Science and Public Policy, 31, 371-383.
14. European Council, 2000. Lisbon European Council: Presidency Conclusions. Brussels: European Council.
15. Goldstein, J and M Brown 1997. The clinical investigator: bewitched, bothered, and bewildered - but still beloved. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 99, 2803-2812.
16. Hagstrom, W 1965. The Scientific Community. New York NY: Basic Books.
17. Heller, M and R Eisenberg 1998. Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science, 280, 698-701.
18. Kitcher, P 1990. The division of cognitive labor. Journal of Philosophy, 87, 5-22.
19. Kitcher, P 1993. The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. New York NY: Oxford University Press.
20. Mauss, M 1967. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. New York NY: Norton and Co.
21. Merton, R 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
22. Mirowski P and R Van Horn 2005. The contract research organization and the commercialization of scientific research. Social Studies of Science, 35, 503-548.
23. Mora-Valentin, E 2002. A theoretical review of co-operative relationships between firms and universities. Science and Public Policy, 29, 37-46.
24. Nelson, R 1959. The simple economics of basic scientific research. The Journal of Political Economy, 67, 297-306.
25. Nelson, R 2004. The market economy, and the scientific commons. Research Policy, 33, 455-471.
26. Pisano, G 2002. Pharmaceutical biotechnology. In Technological Innovation and Economic Performance, ads. R Nelson, D Victor and B Steil. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
27. Price, D 1967. The Scientific Estate. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Rappa, M and K Debackere 1993. Social and cognitive influences on problem choice in R&D. Best Research Paper Proceedings of the American Academy of Management, 53, 347-351.
29. Rees, J 2000. Patents and intellectual property: a salvation for patient-oriented research? The Lancet, 356, 849-850.
30. Rodriguez, V 2005. Material transfer agreements: open science vs. proprietary claims. Nature Biotechnology, 23, 489-491.
31. Rodriguez, V, F Janssens, K Debackere and B De Moor 2007. Do material transfer agreements affect the choice of research agendas? The case of biotechnology in Belgium. Scientometrics, 71, 239-269.
32. Silverman E 2007. The trouble with tech transfer. The Scientist, 21, 40-45.
33. Slaughter, S and G Rhoades 1996. The emergence of a competitiveness research and development policy: Coalition and commercialization of academic science and technology. Science, Technology and Human Values, 23, 303-339.
34. Soedarjo, A 2007. WHO must follow rules, like everyone else. The Jakarta Post, 17 February.
35. Stephan, P 1996. The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 1199-1235.
36. Streitz, W, I De Bear, C Calmettes and F Reinhart 2003. Material Transfer Agreements: a Win-Win for Academia and Industry. Northbrook IL: Association of University Technology Managers.
37. US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division 2006. The Washington University v. Dr William Catalona and his patients. Case no 4:03CV1065SNL. Lexis, 22969, 1-93.
38. van den Daele, W and P Weingart 1976. Resistance and receptivity in science to external direction: the emergence of new disciplines under the impact of policy. In Perspectives on the Emergence of Scientific Disciplines, ads. G Lemaine, R MacLeod, M Mulkay and P Weingart. The Hague: Mouton.
39. van den Daele, W, W Krohn and P Weingart 1977. The political direction of scientific development. In The social Production of Knowledge: Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, eds. E Mendelsohn, P Weingart and R Whitle. Dordrecht: Reide.
40. Walsh, J, C Cho and W Cohen 2005. View from the bench: Patents and material transfers. Science, 309, 2002-2003.
41. Ziman, J 1999. Rules of the game of doing science. Nature, 400, 721.
42. Ziman, J 2000. Real Science: What it Is and What it Means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Ziman, J 2003. Non-instrumental roles of science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9, 17-27.