A computational model of retrospective time estimation

Cognitive Systems Research

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 208-215

  Dzaack, Jeronimo ^a   Trösterer, Sandra ^a   Pape, Nele ^a   Urbas, Leon ^b  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

ACT R; Cognitive models; Retrospective time estimation

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; ESTIMATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

COGNITIVE ARCHITECTURES; COGNITIVE MODELS; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; RETROSPECTIVE TIME ESTIMATION;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THEORETICAL STUDY; TIME PERCEPTION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 34548669379     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13890417     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anderson J.R., Bothell D., Byrne M.D., Douglass S., Lebiere C., and Qin Y. An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review 111 (2004) 1036-1060
2. Block R.A., and Reed M.A. Remembered duration: Evidence for a contextual-change hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology 4 6 (1978) 656-665
3. Block R.A., and Zakay D. Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 4 2 (1997) 184-197
4. Block R.A., and Zakay D. Models of psychological time revisited. In: Helfrich H. (Ed). Time and mind (1996), Hogrefe & Huber, Kirkland, WA 171-195
5. Bothell, D. (2005). ACT-R Software Framework Specification, v 1.2.9. Retrieved from svn://alba.psy.cmu.edu/usr/local/svnroot/actr6 [2005-12-14].
6. Brickenkamp R. Test d2 Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs-Test 9 überarbeitete und neu normierte Auflage (2001), Hogrefe Verlag, Bern
7. Brown S.W. Time perception and attention: The effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demand on perceived duration. Perception and Psychophysics 38 2 (1985) 115-124
8. Byrne, M. D. (2006). An ACT-R Timing Module Based on the Attentional Gate Model. ACT-R Workshop. Retrieved from http://chil.rice.edu/projects/agm/index.html6 [2005-12-14].
9. Card S.K., Moran T.P., and Newell A. The psychology of human-computer interaction (1983), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
10. Card S.K., Moran T.P., and Newell A. The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems. Communications of the ACM 23 7 (1980) 396-410
11. Gibbon J. Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. Psychological Review 84 (1977) 279-325
12. Gibbon J., Church R.M., and Meck W.H. Scalar timing in memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 423 (1984) 52-77
13. Hamacher N., Kraiss K.-F., and Marrenbach J. Einsatz formaler Methoden zur Evaluierung der Gebrauchsfähigkeit interaktiver Geräte. it + ti Informationstechnik und Technische Informatik 44 1 (2002) 49-55
14. Hicks R.E., Miller G.W., and Kinsbourne M. Prospective and retrospective judgments of time as a function of amount of information processed. American Journal of Psychology 89 (1976) 719-730
15. James W. The Principles of psychology (1890), Hentry Holt, New York
16. McClain L. Interval estimation: Effect of processing demands on prospective and retrospective reports. Perception and Psychophysics 34 2 (1983) 185-189
17. Meyer D.E., and Kieras D.E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2 Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review 104 (1997) 749-791
18. Newell A. Theories of cognition (1990), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
19. Pape, N., Dzaack, J., Leuchter, S., & Urbas, L. (2005). How to integrate time-duration estimation in ACT-R/PM. In Proceedings of the 12th annual ACT-R workshop. Trieste, Italy.
20. Pape N., Kühnen R., Schulze-Kissing D., and Urbas L. Welchen Einfluss nehmen Wartezeiten auf die retrospektive Zeitschätzung?. In: Hecht H., Berti S., Meinhardt G., and Gamer M. (Eds). Beiträge zur 48 Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen 26-29 März 2006 S. 160 (2006), Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich
21. Pew R.W., and Mavor A.S. Modeling human and organizational behavior: Application to military simulations (1998), National Academic Press, Washington, DC
22. Predebon J. The effects of active and passive processing of interval events on prospective and retrospective time estimates. Acta Psychologica 94 (1996) 41-58
23. Ritter F.E., Shadbolt N.R., Elliman D., Young R.M., Gobet F., and Baxter G.D. Techniques for modeling human and organizational behaviour in synthetic environments: A supplemetary review (2003), Human Systems Information Analysis Center, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH
24. Salvucci D.D., and Lee F.J. Simple cognitive modeling in a complex cognitive architecture. In: Ashlund S., Mullet K., Henderson A., Hollnagel E., and White T. (Eds). Proceedings of CHI 2003 (2003), ACM Press, New York, NY 265-272
25. Schulze-Kissing, D., van der Meer, E., & Urbas, L. (2004). A psychological analysis of temporal errors in human-machine-systems. In Proceedings of the IFAC symposium: Analysis, design and evaluation of human-machine-systems. Atlanta, USA, 07-09 September, 2004.
26. Taatgen, N. A., Rijn, H. v., & Anderson, J. R. (in press). An integrated theory of prospective time interval estimation: The role of cognition, attention and learning. Revision is prepared for Psychological Review. Retrieved from http://act-r.psy.cmu.edu/papers/659/Interval-final.pdf [2006-11-07].
27. Taatgen N.A., van Rijn H., and Anderson J.R. Time perception: Beyond simple interval estimation. Proceedings of the sixth international conference on cognitive modeling (2004), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 296-301
28. Urbas L., Schulze-Kissing D., Leuchter S., Dzaack J., Kiefer J., and Heinath M. Programmbeschreibung D2-Drive-Aufmerksamkeitstest (2005), ZMMS, Berlin
29. Zakay D., and Block R.A. Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: An executive-control perspective. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis 64 (2004) 319-328