Simple cognitive modeling in a complex cognitive architecture

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 265-272

  Salvucci, Dario D ^a   Lee, Frank J ^b  

^a Drexel University   (United States)

^b RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

ACT R; Cognitive architectures; Cognitive modeling

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; DATA REDUCTION; ARCHITECTURE; HUMAN ENGINEERING;

COGNITIVE ARCHITECTURE; ACT-R; COGNITIVE ARCHITECTURES; COGNITIVE MODELING; DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES; DIRECT INTERACTIONS; EMPIRICAL VALIDATION; MODEL DEVELOPMENT; MODELING FRAMEWORKS; PREDICTING USER BEHAVIOR; REAL-WORLD SYSTEM; USER BEHAVIORS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

EID: 0037699527     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/642611.642658     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Ball, J., Gluck, K., Krusmark, M., Purtee, M., & Rodgers, S. (2002). Process and challenges in development of the Predator air vehicle operator model. Eighth Annual ACT-R Workshop, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
3. Best, B., Lebiere, C. & Scarpinatto, C. (2002). Modeling synthetic opponents in urban combat simulations. Eighth Annual ACT-R Workshop, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
4. Byrne, M. D. (2001). ACT-R/PM and menu selection: Applying a cognitive architecture to HCI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55, 41-84.
5. Byrne, M. D., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Serial modules in parallel: The psychological refractory period and perfect time-sharing.. Psychological Review, 108, 847-869.
6. Card, S., Moran, T., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Gray, W. D., John, B. E., & Atwood, M. E. (1993). Project Ernestine: A validation of GOMS for prediction and explanation of real-world task performance. Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 237-309.
8. Hornof, A. J., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). Cognitive modeling reveals menu search is both random and systematic. In Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI 97 Conference Proceedings (pp. 107-114). New York: ACM Press.
9. John, B. E. (1990). Extensions of GOMS analyses to expert performance requiring perception of dynamic visual and auditory information. In Proceedings of CHI 90 (pp. 107-115). New York: ACM Press.
10. John, B. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1996). The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: Comparison and contrast. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 3, 320-351.
11. John, B. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1996). Using GOMS for user interface design and evaluation: Which technique?. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 3, 287-319.
12. John, B., Vera, A., Matessa, M., Freed, M., & Remington, R. (2002). Automating CPM-GOMS. In Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI 2002 Conference Proceedings. New York: ACM Press.
13. Kieras, D. E. (1988). Towards a practical GOMS model methodology for user interface design. In M. Helander (Ed.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 135-157). New York: North-Holland Publishing.
14. Laird, J. E., Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1987). Soar: An architecture for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 33, 1-64.
15. Lebiere, C., & Anderson, J. R. (1993). A connectionist implementation of the ACT-R production system. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Lee, F. J., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Does learning of a complex task have to be complex? A study in learning decomposition. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 267-316.
17. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997a). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3-65.
18. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Nielsen, J., & Phillips, V. L. (1993). Estimating the relative usability of two interfaces: Heuristic, formal, and empirical methods compared. In Proceedings of INTERCHI 1993 (pp. 214-221). New York: ACM Press.
20. Salvucci, D. D. (2001). Predicting the effects of in-car interface use on driver performance: An integrated model approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55, 85-107.
21. Salvucci, D. D., Boer, E. R., & Liu, A. (2001). Toward an integrated model of driver behavior in a cognitive architecture. Transportation Research Record, 1779.