A precise method for linking neuroanatomy to function after stroke: A pilot study

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 12-17

  Skidmore, Elizabeth R ^a   Rogers, Joan C ^a   Chandler, Lynette S ^a   Jovin, Tudor G ^b   Holm, Margo B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Neuroanatomy; Outcome; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROANATOMY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT MOBILITY; PILOT STUDY; SELF CARE; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; STROKE;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COGNITION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DECISION MAKING; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; NEUROANATOMY; PILOT PROJECTS; SENSATION;

EID: 34548663131     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/tsr1405-12     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2006 update. A report for the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2006;113:e85-151.
2. Elkins JS, Johnston SC. Thirty-year projections for deaths from ischemic stroke in the United States. Stroke. 2003;34:2109-2112.
3. Institute of Medicine Committee on Identifying Priority Areas for Quality Improvement. Priority Areas for National Action: Transforming Health Care Quality. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003.
4. Chaudhuri G, Harvey RF, Sulton LD, Lamber RW. Computerized tomography head scans as predictors of functional outcome of stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69:496-498.
5. Saeki S, Ogata H, Hachisuka K, Okubo T, Takahashi K, Hoshuyama T. Association between location of the lesion and discharge status of ADL in first stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:858-860.
6. Chae J, Zorowitz R. Functional status of cortical and subcortical nonhemorrhagic stroke survivors and the effect of lesion laterality. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;77:415-420.
7. Beloosesky Y, Streifler JY, Vurstin A, Grinblat J. The importance of brain infarct size and location in predicting outcome after stroke. Age Ageing. 1995;24:515-518.
8. Dromerick A, Reding M. Functional outcomes for patients with hemiparesis, hemihypesthesia, and hemianopsia: Does lesion location matter? Stroke. 1995;26:2023-2026.
9. Saver JL, Johnston KC, Homer D, Wityk R, Koroshetz WJ, Truskowski LL, Haley C. Infarct volume as a surrogate or auxiliary outcome measure in ischemic stroke clinical trials. Stroke. 1999;30:293-298.
10. Schiemanck SK, Kwakkel G, Post MWM, Kappelle LJ, Prevo AJH. Predicting long-term independency in activities of daily living after middle cerebral artery stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:1050-1054.
11. Chen CL, Tang FT, Chen HC, Chung CY, Wong MK. Brain lesion size and location: effects on motor recovery and functional outcome in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:447-452.
12. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research and the Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Guideline Panel. Post-Stroke Rehabilitation. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1995. Report No. 95-0662. Sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
13. Kelly-Hayes M, Robertson JT, Broderick JP, Duncan PW, Hershey LA, Roth EJ, Thies WH, Trombly CA. The American Heart Association Stroke Outcome Classification. Stroke. 1998;29:1274-1280.
14. Duncan PW, Zorowitz R, Bates B, Choi JY, Glasberg JJ, Graham GD, Katz RC, Lamberty K, Reker D. Management of adult stroke rehabilitation care: A clinical practice guideline. Stroke. 2005;36:e100-e143.
15. Brott T, Marler JR, Olinger CP, Adams HP, Tomsick T, Barsan WG, Biller J, Eberle R, Hertzberg V, Walker M. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: lesion size by computed tomography. Stroke. 1989;20:871-875.
16. Lyden PD, Zweifler R, Mahdavi Z, Lonzo L. A rapid, reliable and valid method for measuring infarct and brain compartment volumes from computed tomography scans. Stroke. 1994;25:2421-2428.
17. Saunders DE, Clifton AG, Brown MM. Measurement of infarct size using MRI predicts prognosis in middle cerebral artery infarction. Stroke. 1995;26:2272-2276.
18. van der Worp HB, Claus S, Bar PR, Ramos LM, Algra A, van Gijn J, Kappelle LJ. Reproducibility of measurements of cerebral infarct volume on CT scans. Stroke. 2001;32:424-430.
19. Hoffman T, McKenna K. Prediction of outcome after stroke: implications for clinical practice. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2001;19:53-75.
20. Jongbloed L. Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review. Stroke. 1986;17:765-776.
21. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Kollen GJ, Lankhorst GJ. Predicting disability in stroke: a critical review of the literature. Age Ageing. 1996;25:479-489.
22. Tatu L, Moulin T, Bogousslavsky J, Duvernoy H. Arterial territories of human brain. In: J Bogousslavsky, Caplan LR, eds. Stroke Syndromes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2001:375-404.
23. Brott T, Adams HP, Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20:864-870.
24. Frankel MR, Morgenstern LB, Kwiatkowski T, Lu M, Tilley BC, Broderick JP, Libman R, Levine SR, Brott T. Predicting prognosis after stroke: a placebo group analysis from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Trial. Neurology. 2000;55:952-959.
25. Holm MB, Rogers JC. Functional assessment: the Performance Assessment of Self-Care Skills (PASS). In: Hemphill BJ, ed. Assessments in Occupational Therapy Mental Health: An Integrative Approach. Thorofare, NJ: Slack, Inc; 1999:117-124.
26. Kass G. An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Appl Statistics. 1980;29:119-127.
27. Biggs D, de Ville B, Suen B. A method of choosing multiway partitions for classification and decision trees. J Appl Statistics. 1991;18:49-62.
28. Skidmore ER, Rogers JC, Chandler LS, Holm MB. Developing empirical models to enhance stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:1027-1034.
29. Skidmore ER, Rogers JC, Chandler LS, Holm MB. Dynamic interactions between impairment and activity after stroke: examining the utility of decision analysis methods. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:523-535.
30. Berman SA, Hayman LA, Hinck VC. Correlation of CT cerebral vascular territories with function: 3. midddle cerebral artery. Am J Roentgenol. 1984;142:1035-1040.
31. Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM, eds. Principles of Neural Science. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000.
32. van de Port I, Kwakkel G, van Wijk I, Lindeman E. Susceptibility to deterioration of mobility long-term after stroke: a prospective cohort study. Stroke. 2006;37:167-171.
33. Sands L, Yaffe K, Covinsky K, Chren M, Counsell C, Palmer R, Fortinksy R, Landefeld C. Cognitive screening predicts magnitude of functional recovery from admission to 3 months after discharge in hospitalized elders. J Gerontol. 2003;58:37-45.
34. Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System - An Approach to Cerebral Imaging. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 1988.
35. Mazziotta JC, Toga AW, Evans A, Fox P, Lancaster J. A probablistic atlas of the human brain: theory and rationale for its development. NeuroImage. 1995;2:89-101.
36. Evans AC, Collins DL, Milner B. An MRI-based stereotactic atlas from 250 young normal subjects. J Soc Neurosci. 1992;18:408.
37. Evans AC, Collins DL, Mills SR, Brown ED, Kelly RL, Peters TM. 3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes. Proc IEEE-Nuclear Sci Symp Med Imaging Conf. 1993;1813-1817.