Nutrition screen showed good agreement when self- and interviewer administered

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 60, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1085-1089

  Beath, Heather ^a   Keller, Heather H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Agreement; Community; Index; Nutrition; Older adults; Screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET SUPPLEMENTATION; FEMALE; FLUID INTAKE; FOOD INTAKE; HUMAN; MALE; MALNUTRITION; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FEMALE; FOOD HABITS; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITION ASSESSMENT; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; SELF DISCLOSURE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TELEPHONE;

EID: 34548660229     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Council on Practice and Quality Management Committee. Identifying patients at risk: ADA's definitions for nutrition screening and nutrition assessment. J Am Diet Assoc 94 (1994) 838-839
2. Visvanathan R. Under-nutrition in older people: a serious and growing global problem!. J Postgrad Med 49 (2003) 352-360
3. Payette H., and Gray-Donald K. Risk of malnutrition in an elderly population receiving home care services. Facts and research in gerontology Suppl 2 (1994) 71-85
4. Dwyer J. Strategies to detect and prevent malnutrition in the elderly: the nutrition screening initiative. Nutr Today 29 (1994) 14-23
5. Keller H.H., Goy R., and Kane S.-L. Validity and reliability of SCREEN II (seniors in the community: risk evaluation for eating and nutrition, version II. Eur J Clin Nutr 59 (2005) 1149-1157
6. Olsen J., and Frische G. Comparison between data obtained through questionnaires and interviews: life-style habits of pregnant women. Scand J Soc Med 16 (1988) 49-52
7. Cook D.J., Guyatt G.H., Juniper E., Griffith L., McIlroy W., Willan A., et al. Interviewer versus self-administered questionnaires in developing a disease-specific, health related quality of life instrument. J Clin Epidemiol 46 (1993) 529-534
8. Okamoto K., Ohsuka K., Shiraishi T., Hukazawa E., Wakasugi S., and Kayoko F. Comparibility of epidemiological information between self- and interviewer-administered questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 55 (2002) 505-511
9. Siemiatycki J. A comparison of mail, telephone, and home interview strategies for household health surveys. Am J Public Health 69 (1979) 238-245
10. Tarnai J., and Dillman D.A. Questionnaire context as a source of response differences in mail and telephone surverys. In: Schwarz N., and Sudman S. (Eds). Context effects in social and psychological research (1992), Springer Verlag, New York
11. Bartfay E., and Donner A. The effect of collapsing multinominal data when assessing agreement. Int J Epidemiol 29 (2002) 1070-1075
12. Donker D.K., Hasman A., and Van Geijn H.P. Interpretation of low kappa values. Int J Biomed Comput 33 (1993) 55-64
13. Keller H.H., and Østbye T. Nutritional risk and time to death; predictive validity of SCREEN© (Seniors in the Community Risk Evaluation for Eating and Nutrition). J Nutr Health Aging 7 (2003) 274-279
14. Keller H.H., McKenzie J.D., and Goy R. Construct validation and test-retest reliability of SCREEN (Seniors in the Community: Risk Evaluation for Eating and Nutrition). J Gerontol: Med Sci 9 (2001) M552-M558
15. Gjorup T. The kappa coefficient and the prevalence of a diagnosis. Methods Inf Med 27 (1988) 184-186
16. Walter S.D. Measuring the reliability of clinical data: the case for using three observers. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 32 (1984) 206-211
17. Van Ooijen M., Ivens U.I., Johansen C., et al. Comparison of a self-administered questionnaire and telephone interview of 146 Danish waste collectors. Am J Ind Med 31 (1997) 653-658
18. Carmines E.G., and Zeller R.A. Reliability and validity assessment. Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, 07-017 (1979), Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA and London p. 40