The temporal representation of the delay of dynamic iterated rippled noise with positive and negative gain by single units in the ventral cochlear nucleus

Brain Research

Volumn 1171, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 52-66

  Sayles, Mark ^a   Winter, Ian Michael ^a  

^a PHYSIOLOGICAL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Autocorrelation; Inter spike interval; Iterated rippled noise; Pitch

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEA; GUINEA PIG; HEARING; NOISE; NONHUMAN; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ACTION POTENTIALS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; COCHLEAR NUCLEUS; GUINEA PIGS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS; NOISE; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PITCH PERCEPTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REACTION TIME; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS;

CAVIA;

EID: 34548654018     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.098     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Bendor D., and Wang X. The neuronal representation of pitch in primate auditory cortex. Nature 436 (2005) 1161-1165
2. Bilsen, F.A., Ritsma, R.J., 1969/70. Repetition pitch and its implication for hearing theory. Acoustica. 22 63-73.
3. Bilsen F.A., and Ritsma R.J. Some parameters influencing the perceptibility of pitch. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 47 (1970) 469-475
4. Bilsen F.A., ten Kate J.H., Buunen T.J., and Raatgever J. Responses of single units in the cochlear nucleus of the cat to cosine noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 58 (1975) 858-866
5. Bilsen F.A. Repetition Pitch glide from the step pyramid at Chichen Itza. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120 (2006) 594-596
6. Blackburn C.C., and Sachs M.B. Classification of unit types in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus: PST histograms and regularity analysis. J. Neurophysiol. 62 (1989) 1303-1329
7. Bourk, T.R., 1976. Electrical responses of neural units in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat (PhD thesis). Cambridge MA: MIT.
8. Cariani P.A., and Delgutte B. Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. I. Pitch and pitch salience. J. Neurophysiol. 76 (1996) 1698-1716
9. Cariani P.A., and Delgutte B. Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. II. Pitch shift, pitch ambiguity, phase invariance, pitch circularity, rate pitch, and the dominance region for pitch. J. Neurophysiol. 76 (1996) 1717-1734
10. Dai H. On the relative influence of individual harmonics on pitch judgement. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107 (2000) 953-959
11. Davis H., Silverman S.R., and McAuliffe D.R. Some observations on pitch and frequency. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 23 (1951) 40-42
12. Declercq N.F., Degrieck J., Briers R., and Leroy O. A theoretical study of special acoustic effects caused by the staircase of the El Castillo pyramid at the Mayan ruins of Chichen Itza in Mexico. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116 (2004) 3328-3335
13. Denham S. Pitch detection of dynamic iterated rippled noise by humans and a modified auditory model. Biosystems 79 (2005) 199-206
14. Evans E.F. Latest comparisons between physiological and behavioural frequency selectivity. In: Breebaart D., Houtsma A., Kohlrausch A., Prijs V., and Schoonhoven R. (Eds). Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Hearing, Physiological and Psychophysical Bases of Auditory Function (2001), Shaker BV, Maastrict 382-387
15. Frisina R.D., Smith R.L., and Chamberlain S.C. Encoding of amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: I. A hierarchy of enhancement. Hear. Res. 44 (1990) 99-122
16. Frisina R.D., Smith R.L., and Chamberlain S.C. Encoding of amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: II. Possible neural mechanisms. Hear. Res. 44 (1990) 123-142
17. Hall D.A., Edmonson-Jones A.M., and Fridriksson J. Periodicity and frequency coding in human auditory cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 24 (2006) 3601-3610
18. Hall D.A., and Plack C.J. The human 'pitch centre' responds differently to iterated noise and Huggins pitch. NeuroReport 18 (2007) 323-327
19. Hartmann W.M. Signals, Sound, and Sensation (1997), Springer, New York
20. Keilson S.E., Richards V.M., Wyman B.E., and Young E.D. The representation of concurrent vowels in the cat anaesthetized ventral cochlear nucleus: evidence for a periodicity-tagged spectral representation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102 (1997) 1056-1070
21. Kim D.O., Sirianni J.G., and Chang S.O. Responses of DCN-PVCN neurons and auditory nerve fibres in unanaesthetised decerebrate cats to AM and pure tones: analysis with autocorrelation/power-spectrum. Hear. Res. 45 (1990) 95-113
22. Krishnan A., Swaminathan J., and Gandour J. Pitch encoding of dynamic iterated rippled noise in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. Abs. (2006) 37-38
23. Krumbholz K., Patterson R.D., and Pressnitzer D. The lower limit of pitch as determined by rate discrimination. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108 (2000) 1170-1180
24. Liberman A.M., Delattre P.C., Gerstman L.J., and Cooper F.S. Tempo of frequency changes as a cue for distinguishing classes of speech sounds. J. Exp. Psychol. 52 (1956) 127-137
25. Lloyd M.E.A. A fast inexpensive stimulus presentation and data acquisition system for auditory neuroscience. Int. J. Audiol. 41 (2002) 263
26. Louage D.H.G., van der Heijden M., and Joris P.X. Enhanced temporal response properties of anteroventral cochlear nucleus neurons to broadband noise. J. Neurosci. 25 (2005) 1560-1570
27. Lubman D. Archaeological acoustic study of chirped echo from the Mayan pyramid at Chichen Itza. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104 (1998) 1763
28. Meddis R., and O'Mard L.P. Virtual pitch in a computational model. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120 (2006) 3861-3869
29. Merrill E.G., and Ainsworth A. Glass-coated platinum-plated tungsten microelectrodes. Med. Biol. Eng. 10 (1972) 662-672
30. Moore B.C.J. Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54 (1973) 610-619
31. Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., and Peters R.W. Relative dominance of individual partials in determining the pitch of complex tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77 (1985) 1853-1860
32. Neuert V., Verhey J.L., and Winter I.M. Temporal representation of the delay of iterated rippled noise in the dorsal cochlear nucleus. J. Neurophysiol. 93 (2005) 2766-2776
33. O'Shaughnessy D., and Allen J. Linguistic modality effects on fundamental frequency in speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74 (1983) 1155-1171
34. Patterson R.D., Uppenkamp S., Johnstrude I.S., and Griffiths T.D. The processing of temporal pitch and melody information in auditory cortex. Neuron 36 (2002) 767-776
35. Palmer A.R., and Russell I.J. Phase-locking in the cochlear nerve of the guinea pig and its relation to the receptor potential of inner hair cells. Hear. Res. 24 (1986) 1-15
36. Plomp R. Pitch of complex tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 41 (1967) 1526-1533
37. Poeppel D. The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralisation as 'asymmetric sampling in time'. Speech Commun. 41 (2003) 245-255
38. Pressnitzer D., Patterson R.D., and Krumbholz K. The lower limit of melodic pitch. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109 (2001) 2074-2084
39. Raatgever J., and Bilsen F.A. The pitch of anharmonic comb filtered noise reconsidered. In: Cazals Y., Horner K., and Demany L. (Eds). Auditory Physiology and Perception (1992), Pergamon, New York 215-222
40. Rhode W.S. Neural encoding of single-formant stimuli in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the chinchilla. Hear. Res. 117 (1998) 39-56
41. Rhode W.S., and Greenberg S. Encoding of amplitude modulation in the cochlear nucleus of the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 71 (1994) 1797-1825
42. Ritsma R.J. Frequencies dominant in the perception of the pitch of complex sounds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 42 (1967) 191-198
43. Sek A., and Moore B.C.J. Discrimination of frequency steps linked by glides of various durations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106 (1999) 351-359
44. Shofner W.P. Temporal representation of rippled noise in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the chinchilla. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90 (1991) 2450-2466
45. Shofner W.P., and Yost W.A. Discrimination of rippled-spectrum noise from flat-spectrum noise by chinchillas: evidence for a spectral dominance region. Hear. Res. 110 (1997) 15-24
46. Shofner W.P. Responses of cochlear nucleus units in the Chinchilla to iterated rippled noises: analysis of neural autocorrelograms. J. Neurophysiol. 81 (1999) 2662-2674
47. Stagray J.R., Downs D., and Sommers R.K. Contributions of the fundamental, resolved harmonics, and unresolved harmonics in tone-phoneme identification. J. Speech Hear. Res. 35 (1992) 1406-1409
48. Supin A., Popov V.V., Milekhina O.N., and Tarakanov N.B. Frequency resolving power measured with rippled noise. Hear. Res. 78 (1994) 31-40
49. Swaminathan J., Ananthanarayan K., Gandour J.T., and Xu Y. Applications of static and dynamic iterated rippled noise to evaluate pitch encoding in the human auditory brainstem. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. (2007) 10.1109/TBME.2007.896592
50. ten Kate J.H., and van Bekkum M.F. Synchrony-dependant autocorrelation in eighth-nerve-fiber response to rippled noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84 (1988) 2092-2102
51. Verhey J.L., and Winter I.M. The temporal representation of the delay of iterated rippled noise with positive and negative gain by chopper units in the cochlear nucleus. Hear. Res. 216-217 (2006) 43-51
52. Wiegrebe L., Patterson R.D., Demany L., and Carlyon R.P. Temporal dynamics of pitch strength in regular interval noises. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104 (1998) 2307-2313
53. Wiegrebe L. Searching for the time constant of neural pitch integration. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109 (2001) 1082-1091
54. Wiegrebe L., and Winter I.M. Temporal representation of iterated rippled noise as a function of delay and sound level in the ventral cochlear nucleus. J. Neurophysiol. 85 (2001) 1206-1219
55. Wiegrebe L., and Winter I.M. Psychophysics and physiology of regular interval noise: critical experiments for current models and evidence for a first order, temporal pitch code. In: Breebart, et al. (Ed). Physiological and Psychophysical Bases of Auditory Function (2001), Shaker Publishing, Maastricht
56. Wiegrebe L., and Meddis R. The representation of periodic sounds in simulated sustained chopper units in the ventral cochlear nucleus. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115 (2004) 1207-1217
57. Winter I.M., and Palmer A.R. Responses of single units in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the guinea pig. Hear. Res. 44 (1990) 161-178
58. Winter I.M., Wiegrebe L., and Patterson R.D. The temporal representation of the delay of iterated rippled noise in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the guinea-pig. J. Physiol. 537 (2001) 533-566
59. White J.A., Young E.D., and Manis P.B. The electrotonic structure of regularly spiking neurons in the ventral cochlear nucleus may determine their response properties. J. Neurophysiol. 71 (1994) 1774-1786
60. Yost W.A., Hill R., and Perez-Falcon T. Pitch and pitch discrimination of broadband signals with rippled power spectra. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63 (1978) 1166-1173
61. Yost W.A. Pitch of iterated rippled noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100 (1996) 511-518
62. Yost W.A., Patterson R.D., and Sheft S. A time-domain description for the pitch strength of iterated rippled noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99 (1996) 1066-1078
63. Yost W.A., Patterson R.D., and Sheft S. The role of envelope in processing iterated rippled noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104 (1998) 2349-2361
64. Young E.D., Robert J.M., and Shofner W.P. Regularity and latency of units in the ventral cochlear nucleus: implications for unit classification and generation of response properties. J. Neurophysiol. 60 (1988) 1-29