Virtual pitch in a computational physiological model

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 120, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 3861-3869

  Meddis, Ray ^a   O'Mard, Lowel P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITION; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; NATURAL FREQUENCIES; NEUROLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; SENSORY PERCEPTION;

AUDITORY NERVE; COCHLEAR NUCLEUS; COMPUTATIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL MODEL; FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCY; VIRTUAL PITCH;

AUDIO ACOUSTICS;

ARTICLE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEAR NERVE; COCHLEAR NUCLEUS; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HEARING; INFERIOR COLLICULUS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NOISE; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SOUND DETECTION; SOUND INTENSITY; SOUND TRANSMISSION;

AUDITORY THRESHOLD; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PITCH PERCEPTION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33845362404     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.2372595     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Assmann, P. F., and Summerfield, Q. (1990). " Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: Vowels with different fundamental frequencies., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 680-796.
2. Blackburn, C. C., and Sachs, M. B. (1989). " Classification of unit types in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus: PST histograms and regularity analysis., " J. Neurophysiol. 62, 1303-1329.
3. Carlyon, R. P., Wieringen, A., Long, C. J., Deeks, J. M., and Wouters, J. (2002). " Temporal pitch mechanisms in acoustic and electric hearing., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 621-633.
4. Carlyon, R. P., and Shackleton, T. M. (1994). " Comparing the fundamental frequencies of resolved and unresolved harmonics: Evidence for two pitch mechanisms? " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 3541-3554.
5. De Boer, E. (1956). " On the residue in hearing., " Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam.
6. Gúrin, A., Le Bouquin Jeanǹs, R., B̀s, J., Faucon, G., and Lorenzi, C. (2006). " Evaluation of two computational models of amplitude modulation coding in the inferior colliculus., " Hear. Res. 211, 54-62.
7. de Cheveigń, A. (1998). " Cancellation model of pitch perception., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 1261-1271.
8. Hewitt, M. J., and Meddis, R. (1992). " A computer model of a cochlear-nucleus stellate cell: Responses to amplitude-modulated and pure-tone stimuli., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 2096-2109.
9. Hewitt, M. J., and Meddis, R. (1994). " A Computer Model of Amplitude-Modulation Sensitivity of Single Units in the Inferior Colliculus., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 2145-2159.
10. Houtsma, A. J. M., and Smurzynski, J. (1990). " Pitch identification and discrimination for complex tones with many harmonics., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 304-310.
11. Krishna, B. S., and Semple, M. N. (2000). " Auditory temporal processing: Responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus., " J. Neurophysiol. 84, 255-273.
12. Langner, G. (1981). " Neuronal mechanisms for pitch analysis in the time domain., " Exp. Brain Res. 44, 450-454.
13. Licklider, J. C. R. (1951). " A duplex theory of pitch perception., " Experientia 7, 128-133.
14. Lopez-Poveda, E. A., and Meddis, R. (2001). " A human nonlinear cochlear filterbank., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 3107-3118.
15. Lyon, R. F. (1984). " Computational models of neural auditory processing., " IEEE ICASSP 84, 3.
16. MacGregor, R. J. (1987). Neural and Brain Modeling (Academic, San Diego).
17. Meddis, R., and O'Mard, L. P. (2005). " A computer model of the auditory nerve response to forward masking stimuli., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 3787-3798.
18. Meddis, R., and O'Mard, L. P. (1997a). " A unitary model of pitch perception., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 1811-1820.
19. Meddis, R., and O'Mard, L. P. (1997b). " Modeled chop-S and pauser/build-up responses in the cochlear nucleus: Further studies., " ARO midwinter meeting, abstract 454.
20. Meddis, R. (2006). " Auditory-nerve first-spike latency and auditory absolute threshold: A computer model., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 406-417.
21. Meddis, R., and Hewitt, M. J. (1991). " Virtual pitch and phase-sensitivity studied using a computer model of the auditory periphery: I pitch identification., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 2866-2882.
22. Meddis, R., O'Mard, L. P., and Lopez-Poveda, E. A. (2001). " A computational algorithm for computing nonlinear auditory frequency selectivity., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 2852-2861.
23. Meddis, R., and O'Mard, (1997). " A unitary theory of pitch perception., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 1811-1820.
24. Moore, G. A., and Moore, B. C. J. (2003). " Perception of the low pitch of frequency-shifted complexes., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 977-985.
25. Nelson, P. C., and Carney, L. H. (2004). " A phenomenological model of peripheral and central neural responses to amplitude-modulated tones., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 2173-2186.
26. Plack, C. J., and White, L. (2000). " Pitch matches between unresolved complex tones differing by a single interpulse interval., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 696-705.
27. Plomp, R. (1964). " The ear as a frequency analyzer., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 36, 1628-1636.
28. Pressnitzer, D., Patterson, R. D., and Krumbholz, K. (2001). " The lower limit of melodic pitch., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 2074-2084.
29. Rees, A., and Palmer, A. R. (1988). " Neuronal responses to amplitude-modulated and pure tone stimuli in the guinea-pig inferior colliculus, and their modification by broadband noise., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 1978-1994.
30. Wiegrebe, L., and Meddis, R. (2004). " The representation of periodic sounds in simulated sustained chopper units of the ventral cochlear nucleus., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 1207-1218.
31. Yost, W. A., Hill, R., and Perez-Falcon, T. (1978). " Pitch and pitch discrimination of broadband signals with rippled power spectra., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 1166-1173.