Contextual interference effects with two tasks

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 105, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 177-183

  Simon, Dominic A ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MOTOR SKILLS; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 34548651442     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/PMS.105.1.177-183     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. BATTIG, W. F. (1972) Intratask interference as a source of facilitation on transfer and retention. In E. F. Thompson & J. F. Voss (Eds.), Topics in learning and performance. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 131-159.
2. BRADY, F. (1998) A theoretical and empirical review of the contextual interference effect and the learning of motor skills. Quest, 50, 266-293.
3. FAIRBROTHER, J. T., & SHEA, J. B. (2005) The effects of a single reminder trial on retention of a motor skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76, 49-59.
4. LEE, T. D., & MAGILL, R. A. (1983) The locus of contextual interference in motor-skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 730-746.
5. LEE, T. D., & SIMON, D. A. (2004) Contextual interference. In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: research, theory and practice. London: Routledge. Pp. 29-44.
6. LEE, T. D., WISHART, L., CUNNINGHAM, S., SCCARNAHAN, H. (1997) Modeled timing information during random practice eliminates the contextual interference effect. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 100-105.
7. MAGILL, R. A., & HALL, K. G. (1990) A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human Movement Science, 9, 241-289.
8. MASLOVAT, D., CHUA, R., LEE, T. D., & FRANKS, I. M. (2004) Contextual interference: single task versus multi-task learning. Motor Control, 8, 213-233,
9. METCALFE, J., & SHIMAMURA, A. P. (Eds.) (1994) Metacognition: knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. PERFECT, T. J., & SCHWARTZ, B. L. (Eds.) (2002) Applied metacognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer. Press.
11. POLLATOU, E., KIOUMOURTZOGLOU, E., AGELOUSIS, N., & MAVROMATIS, G. (1997) Contextual interference effects in learning novel motor skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 487-496.
12. SCHMIDT, R. A., & LEE, T. D. (2005) Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. (3rd ed.) Urbana-Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
13. SHEA, J. B., & MORGAN, R. L. (1979) Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 179-187.
14. SHEA, J. B., & TITZER, R. C. (1993) The influence of reminder trials on contextual interference effects. Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, 264-274.
15. SHEWOKIS, P. A., © KLOPFER, D. (2000) Some blocked practice schedules yield better learning than random practice schedules with anticipation timing tasks, Journal of Human Movement Studies, 38, 57-73.
16. SIMON, D. A., & BJORK, R. A. (2001) Metacognition in motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 907-912.
17. SIMON, D. A., © CBJORK, R. A. (2002) Models of performance in learning multi-segment movement tasks: consequences for acquisition, retention and judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 222-232.