The skin irritations of corrosive and non-corrosive irritants in patients with sensitive skin

Korean Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 551-559

  Lee, Bo Hyu ^a   Park, Chang Kenn ^a   Kim, Hye One ^a   Jo, Hee Jin ^a   Park, Chun Wook ^a   Lee, Cheol Heon ^a  

^a Hallym University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Erythema index; Nonanoic acid; Sensitive skin; Sodium lauryl sulfate

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548629820     PISSN: 04944739     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Willis CM, Shaw S, De Lacharriere O, Baverel M, Reiche L, Jourdain R, et al. Sensitive skin: an epidemiological study. Br J Dermatol 2001:145:258-263
2. Jourdain R, Lacharriere O, Bastien P, Maibach HI. Ethnic variations in self-perceived sensitive skin: epidemiological survey. Contact Dermatitis 2002;46:162-169
3. Sparavigna A, Di Pietro A, Setaro M. 'Healthy skin': significance and results of an Italian study on healthy population with particular regard to 'sensitive' skin. Int J Cosmet Science 2005;27:327-331
4. Amin S, Maibach HI. Cosmetic intolerance syndrome: pathophysiology and management. Cosmet Dermatol 1996;9: 34-42
5. Draelos ZD. Sensitive skin: perceptions, evaluation, and treatment. Am J Contact Dermat 1997;8:67-78
6. Buckhardt W. Praktische und theoretische bedeutung der alkalineutralisations und alkaliresistenzproben. Arch Klin Exp Derm 1964;219:600-603
7. Sparavigna A, Pietro A, Setaro M. Sensitive skin: correlation with skin surface microrelief appearance. Skin Res Technol 2006;12:7-10
8. Chew AL, Maibach HI. Irritant dermatitis. 1st ed. Heidelberg: Springer, 2006;3:239-338
9. Wahlberg JE, Lindberg M. Nonanoic acid-an experimental irritant. Contact Dermatitis 2003;49:117-123
10. Lee CH, Kim HW, Han HJ, Park CW. A comparison study of nonanoic acid and sodium lauryl sulfate in skin irritation. Exogen Dermatol 2004;3:19-25
11. Nicander I, Ollmar S, Eek A, Lundh Rozell B, Emtestam L. Correlation of impedance response patterns to histological findings in irritant skin reactions induced by various surfactants. Br J Dermatol 1996;134:221-228
12. Pinnagoda J, Tupker RA, Agner T, Serup J. Guideline for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement. Contact Dermatitis 1990;22:164-178
13. Clarys P, Alewaeters K, Lambrecht R, Barel AO. Skin color measurements: comparison between three instruments: the Chromameter (R). the DermaSpectrometer (R) and the Mexameter (R). Skin Res Technol 2000;6:230-238
14. Muizzuddin N, Marenus KD, Maes DH. Factors defining sensitive skin and its treatment. Am J Contact Dermat 1998;9:170-175
15. Lammintausta K, Maibach HI, Wilson D. Mechanisms of subjective (sensory) irritation, propensity to nonimmunologic contact urticaria and objective irritation in stingers. Derm Beruf Umwelt 1988;36:45-49
16. Frosch PJ. Irritant contact dermatitis, In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goosens A, Lachapelle JM, Rycroft RJG, Scheper RJ, editors. Current topics in contact dermatitis. 1st ed. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1989:385-398
17. Christensen M, Kligman AM. An improved procedure for conducting lactic acid stinging tests on facial skin. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1996;47:1-11
18. Simion FA, Rhein LD, Morrison BM Jr, Scala DD, Salko DM, Kligman AM, et al. Self-perceived sensory responses to soap and synthetic detergent bars correlate with clinical signs of irritation. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995;32:205-211
19. Coverly J, Peters L, Whittle E, Basketter DA. Susceptibility to skin stinging, non-immunologic contact urticaria and acute skin irritation; is there a relationship? Contact Dermatitis 1998:38:90-95
20. Kompaore F, Marty JP, Dupont C. In vivo evaluation of the stratum corneum barrier function in blacks, Caucasians and Asians with two noninvasive methods. Skin Phamacol 1993;6:200-207
21. Aramaki J, Kawana S, Effendy I, Happle R, Loffier H. Differences of skin irritation between Japanese and European women. Br J Dermatol 2002;146:1052-1056
22. Issachar N, Gall Y, Borrel MT, Poelman MC. Correlation between percutaneous penetration of methyl nicotinate and sensitive skin, using laser Doppler imaging. Contact Dermatitis 1998;39:182-186
23. Wu Y, Wang X, Zhou Y, Tan Y, Chen D, Chen Y, et al. Correlation between stinging, TEWL and capacitance. Skin Res Technol 2003;9:90-93
24. Marriott M, Holmes J, Peters L, Cooper K, Rowson M, Basketter DA. The complex problem of sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis 2005;53:93-99
25. English JSC. Current concepts of irritant contact dermatitis. Occup Environ Med 2004;61:722-726
26. Seidenari S, Francomano M, Mantovani L. Baseline biophysical parameters in subjects with sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis 1998;38:311-315
27. Reiche L, Willis C, Wilkinson J, Shaw S, de Lacharriere O. Clinical morphology of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) and nonanoic acid (NAA) irritant patchtest reactions at 48 h and 96 h in 152 subjects. Contact Dermatitis 1998;39:240-243
28. Wahlberg JE, Wrangsjo K, Hietasalo A. Skin irritancy from nonanoic acid. Contact Dermatitis 1985;13:266-269