Baseline biophysical parameters in subjects with sensitive skin

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 311-315

  Seidenari, Stefania ^a   Francomano, Mariangela ^a   Mantovani, Lucia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Biophysical parameters; Capacitance; Casual sebum level; Colorimetry; pH; Sensitive skin; Sensory irritation; Stinging test; Transepidermal water loss; Visual assessment; Washing challenge test

Indexed keywords

LACTIC ACID;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOPHYSICS; COLORIMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERYTHEMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYDRATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PH; PROVOCATION TEST; SCORING SYSTEM; SEBUM; SKIN; SKIN COLOR; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN SENSITIVITY; SKIN WATER LOSS; SYMPTOM; VASODILATATION;

ADULT; BIOPHYSICS; DERMATITIS, CONTACT; DERMATITIS, IRRITANT; FEMALE; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; LACTIC ACID; MIDDLE AGED; SKIN; SKIN PHYSIOLOGY; SKIN PIGMENTATION; SKIN TESTS; SOAPS; WATER LOSS, INSENSIBLE;

EID: 0031849991     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1998.tb05764.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Jackson E M. The science of cosmetics. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1993: 4: 108-110.
2. Berardesca E, Maibach H I. Sensitive and ethnic skin. A need for special skin-care agents. Derm Clin 1991: 9: 89-92.
3. Lammintausta K, Maibach H I, Wilson D. Mechanisms of subjective (sensory) irritation. Propensity to nonimmunologic contact urticaria and objective irritation in stingers Derm Beruf Umwelt 1988: 36: 45-49.
4. Kligman A M. The invisible dermatoses. Arch Dermatol 1991: 127: 1375-1382.
5. Frosch P, Kligman A. A method for appraising the stinging capacity of topically applied substances. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1977: 28: 197-209.
6. Marty J P, Montastier C. Stinging test: le picotement quantifie les peaux sensibles. Cosmétologie 1995: 3: 44-45.
7. Finkey M P. Evaluation of subjective irritation induced by soap materials. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1987: 82: 153-161.
8. Pinnagoda J, Tupker R A, Agner T, Serup J. Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement. A report from the standardization group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1990: 22: 164-178.
9. Basketter D A, Griffiths H A. A study of the relationship between susceptibility to skin stinging and skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis 1993: 29: 185-188.
10. Goffin V, Piérard-Franchimont C, Piérard GE. Sensitive skin and stratum corneum reactivity to household cleaning products. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 34: 81-85.
11. Hamami I, Marks R. Structural determinants of the response of the skin to chemical irritants. Contact Dermatitis 1988: 18: 71-75.
12. Berardesca E, Cespa M, Farinelli N, Rabbiosi G, Maibach H I. In vivo transcutaneous penetration of nicotinates and sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 25: 35-38.
13. Rietschel R L. Stochastic resonance and angry back syndrome: noisy skin. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1996: 3: 152-154.
14. Draelos Z D. Sensitive skin: perceptions, evaluation and treatment. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1997: 8: 67-78.
15. Frosch P J. Irritant contact dermatitis. In: Frosch P J et al. (eds): Current topics in contact dermatitis. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1989: 385-398.
16. Simion F A, Rhein L D, Morrison B M, Scala D D, Salko D M, Kligman A M, Grove G L. Self-perceived sensory responses to soap and synthetic detergent bars correlate with clinical signs of irritation. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995: 32: 205-211.