Integrating ecological features of species in spatial pattern analysis of a plant community

Journal of Vegetation Science

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 223-230

  Pottier, J ^a   Marrs, R H ^b   Bedecarrats A ^a  

^a Cemagref   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clonality; Co inertia analysis; Multiple correspondence analysis; Plant life attribute; Seed dispersion; Spatial autocorrelation analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548624887     PISSN: 11009233     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1658/1100-9233(2007)18[223:IEFOSI]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Amarasekare, P. 2003. Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: A synthesis. Ecol. Lett. 6: 1109-1122.
2. Aubry, P. & Piégay, H. 2001. Pratique de l'analyse de l'autocorrélation spatiale en géomorphologie: définitions opératoires et tests. Géogr. Phys. Quat. 55: 111-129.
3. Bolker, B.M. & Pacala, S.W. 1999. Spatial moment equations for plant competition: Understanding spatial strategies and the advantages of short dispersal. Am. Nat. 153: 575-602.
4. Cazes, P. 1980. L'analyse de certains tableaux rectangulaires décomposés en blocs: généralisation des propriétés rencontrées dans l'étude des correspondances multiples. I. Définitions et applications à l'analyse canonique des variables qualitatives. II. Questionnaires : variantes des codages et nouveaux calculs de contributions. Cahiers Anal. Données 5: 145-161, 387-406.
5. Dale, M.R.T. 1999. Spatial pattern analysis in plant ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
6. Dieckmann, U., Law, R. & Metz, J.A.J. 2001. The geometry of ecological interaction. Simplifying spatial complexity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
7. Dirnböck, T. & Dullinger, S. 2004. Habitat distribution models, spatial autocorrelation, functional traits and dispersal capacity of alpine plant species. J. Veg. Sci. 15: 77-84.
8. Dolédec, S., Chessel, D., ter Braak, C.J.F. & Champely, S. 1996. Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 3: 143-166.
9. Dray, S., Chessel, D. & Thioulouse, J. 2003. Co-inertia analysis and the linking of ecological data tables. Ecology 84: 3078-3089.
10. Dungan, J.L., Perry, J.N., Dale, M.R.T., Legendre, P., Citron-Pousty, S., Fortin, M.J., Jakomulska, A., Miriti, M. & Rosenberg, M.S. 2002. A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis. Ecography 25: 626-640.
11. Escofier, B. & Pages, J. 1990. Analyses factorielles simples et multiples. Objectifs, méthodes et interprétation. Dunod, Paris, FR.
12. Fortin, M.J., Dale, M.R.T. & Ver Hoef, J. 2002. Spatial analysis in ecology. Encycl. Environmetrics 4: 2051-2058.
13. Grime, J.P. 1977. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am. Nat. 111: 1169-1194.
14. Grime, J.P. 2001. Plant strategies, vegetation processes and ecosystem properties. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, US.
15. Grime, J.P., Hodgson, J.G., Hunt, R. 1988. Comparative plant ecology, a functional approach to common British species. Unwin-Hyman, London, UK.
16. Herben, T. & Hara, T. 1997. Competition and spatial dynamics of clonal plants. In: de Kroon, H. & van Groenendael, J. (eds.) The ecology and evolution of clonal plants, pp. 331-357. Backhuys, Leiden, NL.
17. Herben, T. & Hara, T. 2003. Spatial pattern formation in plant communities. In: Sekimura, T., Noji, S., Ueno, N., Maini, RK. (eds.) Morphogenesis and pattern formation in biological systems - experiments and models, pp. 223-235. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, JP.
18. Herben, T., During, H.J. & Law, R. 2000. Spatio-temporal Patterns in grassland communities. In: Metz, J.H.J. (ed.) The geometry of interactions: Simplifying spatial complexity, pp. 48-64. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
19. Hill, M.O. & Smith, A.J.E. 1976. Principal component analysis of taxonomic data with multi-state discrete characters. Taxon 25: 249-255.
20. Klotz, S., Kühn, I. & Durka, W. 2002). BIOLFLOR - Eine Datenbank zu biologisch-ökologischen Merkmalen der Gefäßpflanzen in Deutschland. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn, DE.
21. Kroonenberg, P.M. & Greenacre, M.J. 2006. Correspondence analysis. In: Kotz, S., Balakrishnan, N., Read, C.B., Vidakovic, B. & Johnson, N.L. (eds.) Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, pp. 1394-1403. Wiley, New York, NY, US.
22. Legendre, P. & Fortin, M.J. 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80: 107-138.
23. Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. 1998. Numerical ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL.
24. Legendre, P. & Vaudor, A. 1991. The R Package for spatial and multidimensional analysis. Département de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, Québec, Montréal, CA.
25. Lejeune, O. & Tlidi, M. 1999. A model for the explanation of vegetation stripes (tiger bush). J. Veg. Sci. 10: 201-208.
26. Lepš, J. 1990. Can underlying mechanisms be deduced from observed patterns ? In: Willems, J.H. (ed.) Spatial processes in plant communities, pp. 1-11. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, NL.
27. Levin, S.A. & Muller-Landau, H.C. 2000. The emergence of diversity in plant communities [Emergence de la diversité dans les communautés de plantes]. C.R. Acad. Sci. Ser. III-323: 129-139.
28. Murrell, D.J., Purves, D.W. & Law, R. 2001. Uniting pattern and process in plant ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 529-530.
29. Pacala, S.W. & Levin, S.A. 1997. Biologically generated spatial pattern and the coexistence of competing species. In: Kareiva, P. (ed.) Spatial ecology: The role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions, pp. 204-232. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, US.
30. Pialot, D., Chessel, D. & Auda, Y. 1984. Environmental description and multiple correspondence analysis. C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser. III-298: 309-314.
31. Piqueras, J., Klimeš, L. & Redbo-Torstensson, P. 1999. Modelling the morphological response to nutrient availability in the clonal plant Trientalis europaea L. Plant Ecol. 141: 117-127.
32. Purves, D.W. & Law, R. 2002. Fine-scale spatial structure in a grassland community: quantifying the plant's-eye view. J. Ecol. 90: 121-129.
33. Remmert, H. 1991. The mosaïc-cycle concept of ecosystems - An overview. Ecol. Stud. 85: 1-21.
34. Stoll, P. & Prati, D. 2001. Intraspecific aggregation alters competitive interactions in experimental plant communities. Ecology 82: 319-327.
35. Tenenhaus, M. & Young, F.W. 1985. An analysis and synthesis of multiple correspondence analysis, optimal scaling, dual scaling, homogeneity analysis and other methods for quantifying categorical multivariate data. Psychometrika 50: 91-119.
36. Thioulouse, J., Olivier, J.-M., Chessel, D. & Dolédec, S. 1997. ADE-4: A multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Stat. Comput. 7: 75-83.
37. Tilman, D. 1994. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75: 2-16.
38. van der Maarel, E. 1993. Some remarks on disturbance and its relations to diversity and stability. J. Veg. Sci. 4: 733-736.
39. Wilson, J.B. & Roxburgh, S.H. 1994. A demonstration of guild-based assembly rules for a plant community, and determination of intrinsic guilds. Oikos 69: 267-276.