MISEP method for postnonlinear blind source separation

Neural Computation

Volumn 19, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 2557-2578

  Zheng, Chun Hou ^a,b   Huang, De Shuang ^a   Li, Kang ^c   Irwin, George ^c   Sun, Zhan Li ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF INTELLIGENT MACHINES   (China)

^b QUFU NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; LINEAR NETWORKS; MIXTURES;

AUXILIARY NETWORK; EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCIES; NONLINEAR INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; POST NONLINEAR MIXTURES; POST-NONLINEAR; PRIORI INFORMATION; REAL-SPEECH SIGNALS; SEPARATION ALGORITHMS; SIMULATION SIGNALS; UNMIXING;

BLIND SOURCE SEPARATION;

EID: 34548624811     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2007.19.9.2557     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Achard, S., & Jutten, C (2005). Identifiability of postnonlinear mixtures. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 12(5), 423-426.
2. Achard, S., Pham, D. T., & Jutten, C. (2001). Blind source separation in post nonlinear mixtures. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Independent Component Analysis and Blind Signal Separation, ICA2001 (pp. 295-300). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
3. Almeida, L. B. (1997). Multilayer perceptrons. In E. Fiesler & R. Beale (Eds.), Handbook of neural computation. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Almeida, L. B. (2004). Linear and nonlinear ICA based on mutual information-the MISEP method. Signal Processing, 84, 231-245.
5. Babaie-Zadeh, M., Jutten, C., & Nayebi, K. (2002). A geometric approach for separating post non-linear mixtures. In Proc. Int. Workshop EUSIPCO 2002 (pp. 11-14). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
6. Bell, A., & Sejnowski, T. (1995). An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Computation, 7, 1129-1159.
7. Bishop, C. M., Svensen, M., & Williams, C. K. I. (1998). GTM: The generative topographic mapping. Neural Computation, 10, 215-234.
8. Burel, G. (1992). Blind separation of sources: A nonlinear neural algorithm. Neural Networks, 5, 937-947.
9. Comon, P. (1994). Independent component analysis: A new concept? Signal Processing, 36(3), 287-314.
10. Deco, G., & Brauer, W. (1995). Nonlinear higher-order statistical decorrelation by volume-conserving neural architectures. Neural Networks, 8, 525-535.
11. Herrmann, M., & Yang, H. H. (1996). Perspectives and limitations of self-organizing maps in blind separation of source signals. Progress in Neural Information Processing: Proc. ICONIP'96 (pp. 1211-1216). Berlin: Springer.
12. Huang, D. S. (1998). The local minima free condition of feedforward neural networks for outer-supervised learning. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 28B(3), 477-480.
13. Hyvärinen, A. (1999). Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Neworks, 10(3), 626-634.
14. Hyvärinen, A., Karhunen, J., & Oja, E. (2001). Independent component analysis. New York: Wiley.
15. Hyvärinen, A., & Pajunen, P. (1999). Nonlinear independent component analysis: Existence and uniqueness results. Neural Networks, 22(3), 429-439.
16. Hin, A., Achard, S., & Jutten, C (2004). Bayesian versus constrained structure approaches for source separation in postnonlinear mixtures. In Proc. I]CNN 2004 (pp. 2181-2186). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
17. Ilin, A., & Honkela, A. (2004). Postnonlinear independent component analysis by variational Bayesian learning. In Proc. ICA 2004 (pp. 766-773). Berlin: Springer.
18. Jutten, C., Zadeh, M. B., & Hosseini, S. (2004). Three easy ways for separating nonlinear mixtures? Signal Processing, 84, 217-229.
19. Korenberg, M., & Hunter, I. (1986). The identification of nonlinear biological systems: LNL cascade models. Biology Cybern, 55, 125-134.
20. Larson, L. E. (1998). Radio frequency integrated circuit technology low-power wireless communications. IEEE Personal Communicatbns, 5(3), 11-19.
21. Lee, S., & Batzoglou, S. (2003). Application of independent component analysis to microarrays. Genome Biology, 4(11), R76.
22. Lee, T.-W., Girolami, M., & Sejnowski, T. (1999). Independent component analysis using an extended inf omax algorithm for mixed sub-gaussian and super-gaussian sources. Neural Computation, 11, 417-441.
23. Lee, T.-W., Koehler, B., & Orglmeister, B. U. (1997). Blind source separation of nonlinear mixing model. In Proc. 1997 IEEE Workshop, Neural Networks for Signal Processing VII (pp. 405-415). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
24. Lin, J. K., Grier, D. G., & Cowan, J. D. (1996). Source separation and density estimation by faithful equivariant SOM. In M. Mozer, M. Jordan, & T. Petsche (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 9 (pp. 536-542). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Maeda, S., Song, W. J., & Ishii, S. (2005). Nonlinear and noisy extension of independent component analysis: Theory and its application to a pitch sensation model. Neural Computation, 27(1), 115-144.
26. Martinez, D., & Bray, A. (2003). Nonlinear blind source separation using kernels. IEEE Transactons on Neural Networks, 14(1), 228-235.
27. Pajunen, P. (1998). Blind source separation using algorithmic information theory. Neurocomputing, 22, 35-48.
28. Pajunen, P., Hyvärinen, A., & Karhunen, J. (1996). Nonlinear blind source separation by self-organizing maps. In Progress in Neural Information Processing: Proc. ICONIP'96 (Vol. 2, pp. 1207-1210). Berlin: Springer.
29. Parashiv-Ionescu, A., Jutten, C., & Bouvier, G. (2002). Source separation based processing for integrated hall sensor arrays. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2(6), 663-673.
30. Prakriya, S., &Hatzinakos, D. (1995). Blind identification of LTI-ZMNL-LTI nonlinear channel models. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 43(12), 3007-3013.
31. Solé-Casals, J., Babaie-Zadeh, M., Jutten, C., & Pham, D. (2003). Improving algorithm speed in PNL mixture separation and Wiener system inversion. In Proc. ICA 2003 (pp. 639-644). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
32. Taleb, A. (2002). A generic framework for blind source separation in structured nonlinear models. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50(8), 1819-1830.
33. Taleb, A., & Jutten, C (1997a). Nonlinear source separation: The postnonlinear mixtures. In Proc. ESANN'97 (pp. 279-284). Brussels: D-Facto.
34. Taleb, A., & Jutten, C. (1997b). Entropy optimization, application to blind separation of sources. In Proc. ICANN'97 (pp. 529-534). Berlin: Springer.
35. Taleb, A., & Jutten, C (1999). Source separation in post-nonlinear mixtures. IEEE Transactbns on Signal Processing, 47, 2807-2820.
36. Taleb, A., Jutten, C., & Olympieff, S. (1998). Source separation in post nonlinear mixtures: An entropy-based algorithm. In Proc. ESANN'98 (pp. 2089-2092). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
37. Valpola, H. (2000). Nonlinear independent component analysis using ensemble learning: Theory. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Independent Component Analysis and Blind Signal Separation (pp. 251-256). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
38. Yang, H. H., Amari, S., & Cichocki, A. (1997). Information backpropagation for blind separation of sources from nonlinear mixture. In Proc. IEEE ICNN (pp. 2141-2146). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
39. Yang, H. H., Amari, S., & Cichocki, A. (1998). Information-theoretic approach to blind separation of sources in nonlinear mixture. Signal Processing, 64(3), 291-300.
40. Ziehe, A., Kawanabe, M., Harmeling, S., & Müller, K.-R. (2003). Blind separation of postnonlinear mixtures using linearizing transformations and temporal decorrelation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 4, 1319-1338.