Source separation in post-nonlinear mixtures

IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Volumn 47, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 2807-2820

  Taleb, Anisse ^a   Jutten, Christian ^a  

^a GRENOBLE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; OPTIMIZATION;

SOURCE SEPARATION;

ADAPTIVE FILTERING;

EID: 0033341734     PISSN: 1053587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/78.790661     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. S.-I. Amari, Natural gradient works efficiently in learning, Neura Comput., vol. 10, pp. 251-276, 1998.
2. A. Bell and T. Sejnowski, An information-maximization approach t blind separation and blind deconvolution, Neural Comput., vol. 7, no 6, 1995.
3. S. Bozinoski, A. Taleb, J.-C. Guizzo, and C. Jutten, Séparation d sources, application la séparation de signaux et de brouilleurs dans u satellite de télécommunications, in Proc. GRETSI, Grenoble, France Sept. 1997, pp. 95-98.
4. G. Burel, Blind separation of sources: A nonlinear neural algorithm, Neural Networks, vol. 5, pp. 937-947, 1992.
5. J.-F. Cardoso, Source separation using higher order moments, in Proc ICASSP, Glasgow, U.K., May 1989, pp. 2109-2212.
6. J.-F. Cardoso and B. Laheld, Equivariant adaptive source separation, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 44, pp. 3017-3030, Dec. 1996.
7. N. Charkani and Y. Deville, Optimization of the asymptotic performance of time-domain convolutive source separation algorithms, i Proc. ESANN, Bruges, Belgium, Apr. 1997, pp. 273-278.
8. P. Comon, Independent component analysis, A new concept?, Signa Process., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 287-314, Apr. 1994.
9. G. Darmois, Analyse des liaisons de probabilité, in Proc. Int. Stat Conf. 1947, Washington, DC, 1951, vol. Ill A, p. 231.
10. G. Darmois, Analyse générale des liaisons stochastiques, Rev. Inst Internat. Stat., vol. 21, pp. 2-8, 1953.
11. G. Deco and W. Brauer, Nonlinear higher-order statistical decorrelatio by volume-conserving architectures, Neural Networks, vol. 8, pp 525-535, 1995.
12. N. Delfosse and P. Loubaton, Adaptive blind separation of independen sources: A deflation approach, Signal Process., vol. 45, pp. 59-83 1995.
13. __, Séparation aveugle adptative de mélanges convolutifs, in Proc GRETSI, Juan-Les-Pins, France, Sept. 1995, pp. 281-284.
14. M. Gaeta and J.-L. Lacoume, Source separation without a prior knowledge: The maximum likelihood solution, in Proc. EUSIPCO Barcelona, Spain, Sept. 1990, vol. 2, pp. 621-624.
15. A. Gorokov and P. Loubaton, Second-order blind identification o convolutive mixtures with temporally correlated sources: A subspac based approach, in Proc. EUSIPCO, Trieste, Italy, Sept. 1996, pp 2093-2096
16. J. Hérault, C. Jutten, and B. Ans, Détection de grandeurs primitives dans un message composite par une architecture de calcul neuromimétique en apprentissage non supervisé, in Proc. GRETSI, Nice France, May 20-24, 1985, pp. 1017-1022.
17. K. Hornik, M. Stinchcombe, and H. White, Multilayer feedforwar networks are universal approximators, Neural Networks, vol. 2, no 9 pp. 359-366, 1989.
18. C. Jutten and J. Hérault, Blind separation of sources, Part I: An adaptiv algorithm based on a neuromimetic architecture, Signal Process., vol 24, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 1991.
19. C. Jutten, L. N. Thi, E. Dijkstra, E. Vittoz, and J. Caelen, Blin separation of sources: An algorithm for separation of convolutiv mixtures, in Proc. Int. Signal Process. Workshop Higher Order Stat. Chamrousse, France, July 1991, pp. 273-276.
20. J. Karhunen, Neural approaches to independent component analysi and source separation, in Proc. ESANN, Bruges, Belgium, Apr. 1996 pp. 249-266.
21. M. J. Korenberg and I. W. Hunter, The identification of nonlinea biological systems: LNL cascade models, Biol. Cybern., vol. 55, pp 125-134, 1996.
22. J.-L. Lacoume and P. Ruiz, Sources identification: A solution base on cumulants, in Proc. IEEE ASSP Workshop, Mineapolis, MM, Aug 1988.
23. E. Lukacs, A characterization of the gamma distribution, Ann. Math Statist., vol. 26, pp. 319-324, 1955.
24. A. Mansour, C. Jutten, and P. Loubaton, Subspace method for blin separation of sources in convolutive mixtures, in Proc. EUSIPCO Trieste, Italy, Sept. 1996, pp. 2081-2084.
25. E. Moreau and O. Macchi, New self-adaptive algorithms for sourc separation based on contrast functions, in Proc. IEEE Signal Process Workshop Higher-Order Stat., South Lake Tahoe, CA, June 1993, pp 215-219
26. P. Pajunen, A. Hyvarinen, and J. Karhunen, Non linear source separation by self-organizing maps, in Proc. ICONIP, Hong Kong, Sept 1996, vol. 2, pp. 1207-1210.
27. A. Parashiv-Ionescu, C. Jutten, A. M. lonescu, A. Chovet, and A. Rusu, High performance magnetic field smart sensor arrays with source separation, in Proc. MSM, Santa Clara, CA, Apr. 1998, pp. 666-671
28. D. T. Pham, Séparation aveugle de sources via une analyse en composantes indépendantes, in Proc. GRETSI, Juan-Les-Pins, France, Sept. 1995, pp. 289-292
29. D. T. Pham, P. Garat, and C. Jutten, Separation of a mixture of independent sources through a maximum likelihood approach, in Proc. EUSIPCO, Brussels, Belgium, Aug. 1992, pp. 771-774
30. S. Prakriya and D. Hatzinakos, Blind identification of LTI-ZMNL-LTI nonlinear channel models, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 43, pp. 3007-3013, Dec. 1995
31. V. P. Skitovic, Linear forms of independent random variables and the normal distribution law, Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR. Seriya Matematiceskaya, vol. 18, pp. 185-200, 1954, in Russian
32. A. Stuart and J. K. Ord, Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics, 5th ed. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford Univ. Press, 1991, vol. 1
33. A. Taleb and C. Jutten, Entropy optimization, application to blind source separation, in Proc. ICANN, Lausanne, Switzerland, Oct. 1997, pp. 529-534
34. __, Nonlinear source separation: The post-nonlinear mixtures, in Proc. ESANN, Bruges, Belgium, Apr. 1997, pp. 279-284
35. __, Batch algorithm for source separation in postnonlinear mixtures, in Proc. ICA, Aussois, France, Jan. 1999, pp. 155-160
36. H. L. N. Thi and C. Jutten, Blind sources separation for convolutive mixtures, Signal Process., vol. 45, pp. 209-229, 1995
37. S. Van Gerven and D. Van Compernolle, Feedforward and feedback in a symmetric adaptive noise canceller: Stability analysis in a simplified case, in Proc. EUSIPCO, Brussels, Belgium, Aug. 1992, pp. 1081-1084
38. L. Xu, C. C. Cheung, and S. Amari, Nonlinearity and separation capability: Further justification for the ica algorithm with mixtures of densities, in Proc. ESANN, Bruges, Belgium, Apr. 1997, pp. 291-296
39. H. H. Yang, S. Amari, and A. Cichocki, Information back-propagation for blind separation of sources from nonlinear mixture, in Proc. ICNN, Houston, TX, 1996
40. -, Information-theoritic approach to blind separation of sources in nonlinear mixture, Signal Process., vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 291-300, 1998
41. H. H. Yang and S. I. Amari, Adaptive on-line learning algorithms for blind separation-Maximum entropy and minimum mutual information, Neural Comput., vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 1457-1482, 1997
42. D. Yellin and E. Weinstein, Multichannel signal separation: Methods and analysis, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 44, pp. 106-118, Jan. 1996.