Preceding stimulus awareness augments offset-evoked potentials: Evidence from motion-induced blindness

Psychological Research

Volumn 71, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 694-702

  Klotz, Werner ^a   Ansorge, Ulrich ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ROC CURVE; VISION;

ADULT; AWARENESS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; ROC CURVE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34548617414     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-006-0058-2     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ansorge, U. (2003). Asymmetric influences of temporally vs. nasally presented masked visual information: Evidence for collicular contributions to nonconscious priming effects. Brain and Cognition, 51, 317-325.
2. Ansorge, U. (2004). Top-down contingencies of nonconscious priming revealed by dual-task interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57(A), 1123-1148.
3. Ansorge, U., & Heumann, M. (2003). Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 937-948.
4. Ansorge, U., & Neumann, O. (2005). Intentions determine the effects of invisible metacontrast-masked primes: Evidence for top-down contingencies in a peripheral cueing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 762-777.
5. Atchley, P., Kramer, A. F., & Hillstrom, A. P. (2000). Contingent capture for onsets and offsets: Attentional set for perceptual transients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 595-606.
6. Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 13-23.
7. Bonneh, Y., Cooperman, A., & Sagi, D. (2001). Motion induced blindness in normal observers. Nature, 411, 798-801.
8. Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ganz, L. (1976). Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. Psychological Review, 83, 1-36.
9. Breitmeyer, B. G., Ogmen, H., & Chen, J. (2004). Unconscious priming by color and form: Different processes and levels. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 138-157.
10. Bridgeman, B. (1988). Visual evoked potentials: concomitants of metacontrast in late components. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 401-403.
11. Carter, O. L., & Pettigrew, J. D. (2003). A common oscillator for perceptual rivalries? Perception, 32, 295-305.
12. Chun, M. M., & Marois, R. (2002). The dark side of visual attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12, 184-189.
13. Cole, G. G., Kentridge, R. W., & Heywood, C. A. (2004). Visual salience in the change detection paradigm: The special role of object onset. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 464-477.
14. Csibra, G., Johnson, M. H., & Tucker. L. A. (1997). Attention and oculomotor control: A high-density ERP study of the gap effect. Neuropsychologia, 35, 855-865.
15. Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec'H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., van de Moortele, P., & Le Bihan, D. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597-600.
16. DiLollo, V., Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481-507.
17. Edelman, G. M. (1989). The remembered present: A biological theory of consciousness. New York: Basic Books.
18. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737-1747.
19. Fisher, B., & Weber, H. (1993). Express saccades and visual attention. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 553-610.
20. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
21. Funk, A. P., & Pettigrew, J. D. (2003). Does interhemispheric competition mediate motion-induced blindness? A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Perception, 32, 1325-1338.
22. Gomez, C., Atienza, M., Gomez, G. J., & Vazquez, M. (1996). Response latencies and event-related potentials during the gap paradigm using saccadic responses in human subjects. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 23, 91-99.
23. Graf, E. W., Adams, W. J., & Lages, M. (2002). Modulating motion-induced blindness with depth-ordering and surface completion. Vision Research, 42, 2731-2735.
24. Haynes, J.-D., Driver, J., & Rees, G. (2005). Visibility reflects dynamic changes of effective connectivity between V1 and fusiform cortex. Neuron, 46, 811-821.
25. Hochstoetter, C., Koch, C., & Kiper, D. C. (2004). Motion-induced blindness does not affect the formation of afterimages. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 691-708.
26. Hsu, L. C., Yeh, S. L, & Kramer, P. (2004). Linking motion-induced blindness to perceptual filling-in. Vision Research, 44, 2857-2866.
27. Imai, A., & Tsuji, K. (2004). Event-related potential correlates of judgment categories and detection sensitivity in a visual detection task. Vision Research, 44, 763-773.
28. Jaśkowski, P., van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Schlotterbeck, E., & Verleger, R. (2002). Traces left on visual selective attention by stimuli that are not consciously identified. Psychological Science, 13, 48-54.
29. Jeffreys, D. A., & Musselwhite, M. J. (1986). A visual evoked potential study of metacontrast masking. Vision Research, 26, 631-642.
30. Kaernbach, C., Schroeger, E., Jacobsen, T., & Roeber, U. (1999). Effects of consciousness on human brain waves following binocular rivalry. Neuroreport, 10, 713-716.
31. Kanai, R., Paffen, C. L. E., Gerbino, W., & Verstraten, F. A. J. (2004). Blindness to inconsistent local signals in motion transparency from oscillating dots. Vision Research, 44, 2207-2212.
32. Keysers, C., & Perrett, D. I. (2002). Visual masking and RSVP reveal neural competition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 120-125.
33. Klotz, W., & Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 976-992.
34. Klotz, W., & Wolff, P. (1995). The effect of a masked stimulus on the response to the masking stimulus. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 58, 92-101.
35. Lamme, V. A., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Cognitive Neurosciences, 23, 571-579.
36. Leuthold, H., & Kopp, B. (1998). Mechanisms of priming by masked stimuli: Inferences from event-related brain potentials. Psychological Science, 9, 263-269.
37. Macknik S. L., & Haglund M. M. (1999). Optical images of visible and invisible percepts in the primary visual cortex of primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 15208-15210.
38. Mangun, G. R., & Hillyard, S. A. (1990). Allocation of visual attention to spatial locations: Tradeoff functions for event-related brain potentials and detection performance. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 532-550.
39. McCormick, P. A. (1997). Orienting attention without awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 168-180.
40. Mitroff, S. R., & Scholl, B. J. (2004). Seeing the disappearance of unseen objects. Perception, 33, 1267-1273.
41. Mitroff, S. R., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). Forming and updating object representations without awareness: Evidence from motion-induced blindness. Vision Research, 45, 961-967.
42. Montaser-Kouhsari, L., Moradi, F., Zandvakili, A., & Esteky, H. (2004). Orientation-selective adaptation during motion-induced blindness. Perception, 33, 249-254.
43. Neumann, O., & Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 123-150). Cambridge: MIT.
44. Niedeggen, M., Wichmann, P., & Stoerig, P. (2001). Change blindness and time to consciousness. European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 1719-1726.
45. Pavese, A., Coslett, H. B., Saffran, E., & Buxbaum, L. (2002). Limitations of attentional orienting. Effects of abrupt visual onsets and offsets on naming two objects in a patient with simultanagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1097-1103.
46. Pratt, J., & Hirshhorn, M. (2003). Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 67, 261-265.
47. Rajimehr, R. (2004). Unconscious orientation processing. Neuron, 41, 663-673.
48. Roeber, U., & Schroeger, E. (2004). Binocular rivalry is partly resolved at early processing stages with steady and with flickering presentation: A human event-related brain potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 371, 51-55.
49. Scharlau, I. (2002). Leading, but not trailing, primes influence temporal order perception: Further evidence for an attentional account of perceptual latency priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1346-1360.
50. Scharlau, I., & Ansorge, U. (2003). Direct parameter specification of an attention shift: Evidence from perceptual latency priming. Vision Research, 43, 1351-1363.
51. Scharlau, I., & Neumann, O. (2003a). Perceptual latency priming by masked and unmasked stimuli: Evidence for an attentional explanation. Psychological Research, 67, 184-197.
52. Scharlau, I., & Neumann, O. (2003b). Temporal parameters and time course of perceptual latency priming. Acta Psychologica 113, 185-203.
53. Schiller, P. H., & Chorover, S. L. (1972). Metacontrast: Its relation to evoked potentials. Science, 153, 1398-1400.
54. Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention-the effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception& Psychophysics, 49, 83-90.
55. Tong, F. (2003). Primary visual cortex and visual awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 219-229.
56. Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Vaughan, J. T., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron, 21, 753-759.
57. Treisman, M. (1977). On the stability of ds. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 235-243.
58. van Aalderen-Smeets, S., Oostenveld, R., & Schwarbach, J. (2006) Investigating neurophysiological correlates of metacontrast masking with magnetoencephalography. Advances in Cognitive Psychology.
59. Vaughan, H. G., & Silverstein, L. (1968). Metacontrast and evoked potentials: A reappraisal. Science, 160, 207-208.
60. Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 6275-6280.
61. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1995). Attention capture by contour onsets and offsets-no special role for onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 583-597.
62. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601-621.