On the topographical characterisation of biomaterial surfaces

Surfaces and Interfaces for Biomaterials

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 693-716

  Tomlins, P E ^a   Leach, R ^a   Vadgama, P ^b   Mikhalovsky, S ^c   James, S ^c  

^a NATIONAL PHYSICAL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

BIOMATERIAL SURFACES;

BIOMATERIALS;

EID: 34548604020     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1533/9781845690809.4.693     Document Type: Chapter

References (13)

1. Blunt L. The final report: The development of a basis for 3D surface roughnessstandards July 2001, (EC SMT$-CT98-2256).
2. Bowers K., Keller J.C., Randolph B., Wick D., Michaels C. Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses. in vitro'. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Impl 1992, 7:302-310.
3. Hallab N.J., Bundy K.J., O'connor K., Moses R.L., Jacobs J.J. Evaluation of metallic and polymeric biomaterial surface energy and surface roughness characteristics for directed cell adhesion. Tissue Engineering 2001, 7(1):55.
4. Howell J.R., Blunt L.A., Lee A.J.C., Hooper R.M., Gie G.A., Timperley A.J., Ling R.S.M. An investigation of the fretting wear seen on explanted hip replacement femoral stems. J. Bone Surg 2000, 82(B):52-53.
5. Hurtado-Ramos J.B., Blanco-Garcia J., Fernandez A., Ribas F. An ESPI system for determining in-plane deformations. Three-dimensional analysis of the carrier fringes and a proposal for the analysis of transient in-plane deformations. Meas. Sci. Technol 2001, 12:644-651.
6. Jones R., Wykes C. Holographic and Speckle Interferometry 1989, Cambridge University Press. 2nd.
7. Keller J., Stanford C.M., Wightman J.P., Draughn R.A., Zaharias R. Characterisation of titanium implant surfaces 111. J. Biomed. Mater. Res 1994, 28:939-946.
8. Leach R. The Measurement of Surface Texture using Stylus Instruments. Measurement Good Practice Guide No. 37 2001, National Physical Laboratory.
9. Ogawa T., Sukotjo C., Nishimura I. Modulated bone matrix-related gene expression is associated with differences in interfacial strength of different implant surface roughness. J Prosthodont 2002, 11(4):241-247.
10. Rosa A.L., Beloti M.M. Effect of cpTi surface roughness on human bone marrow cell attachment, proliferation and differentiation. Braz. Dent. J 2003, 14(1):16-21.
11. Schneider G.B., Perinpanayagam H., Clegg M., Zaharias R., Seabold D., Keller J., Stanford C. Implant surface roughness affects osteoblast gene expression. J Dent Res May 2003, 82(5):372-376.
12. Stout K.J., Sullivan P.J., Dong W.P., Mainsah N., Luo N., Mathia T., Zahyouani H. The development of methods for the characterisation of roughness in three dimensions 1993, Commission of the European Communities, (ISBN 0 70441 3131 2). 1st.
13. Whitehouse D.J. The parameter rash - is there a cure?. Wear 1982, 83:75-78.