Genetic improvement of traits affected by interactions among individuals: Sib selection schemes

Genetics

Volumn 176, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 489-499

  Ellen, Esther D ^a   Muir, William M ^b   Teuscher, Friedrich ^c   Bijma, Piter ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR FARM ANIMAL BIOLOGY FBN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE INTERACTION; GENETIC PARAMETERS; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC TRAIT; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIBLING; SIBLING RELATION; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALIA;

ANIMALS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SELECTION (GENETICS); SIBLINGS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 34548556047     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 00166731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.069542     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. AGRAWAL, A. F., E. D. BRODIE III and M. J. WADE, 2001 On indirect genetic effects in structured populations. Am. Nat. 158: 308-323.
2. BIJMA, P., W. M. MUIR and J. A. M. VAN ARENDONK, 2007a Multilevel selection 1: quantitative genetics of inheritance and response to selection. Genetics 175: 277-288.
3. BIJMA, P., W. M. MUIR, E. D. ELLEN, J. B. WOLF and J. A. M. VAN ARENDONK, 2007b Multilevel selection 2: estimating the genetic parameters determining inheritance and response to selection. Genetics 175: 289-299.
4. BRICHETTE, I., M. I. REYERO and C. GARCÍ A, 2001 A genetic analysis of intraspecific competition for growth in mussel cultures. Aquaculture 192: 155-169.
5. CAMERON, N. D., 1997 Selection Indices and Prediction of Genetic Merit in Animal Breeding. CAB International, Oxon, UK.
6. CLUTTON-BROCK, T., 2002 Breeding together: kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates. Science 296: 69-72.
7. CRAIG, D. M., 1982 Group selection versus individual selection: an experimental analysis. Evolution 36: 271-282.
8. DENISON, R. F., E. T. KIERS and S. A. WEST, 2003 Darwinian agriculture: When can humans find solutions beyond the reach of natural selection? Q. Rev. Biol. 78: 145-168.
9. FALCONER, D. S., and T. F. C. MACKAY, 1996 Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Pearson Education, Harlow, England.
10. FRANK, S. A., 1998 Foundations of Social Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
11. GOODNIGHT, C. J., 1985 The influence of environmental variation on group and individual selection in a cress. Evolution 39: 545-558.
12. GRIFFING, B., 1960 Theoretical consequences of truncation selection based on the individual phenotype. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 13: 307-343.
13. GRIFFING, B., 1967 Selection in reference to biological groups I. Individual and group selection applied to populations of unordered groups. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 20: 127-139.
14. GRIFFING, B., 1969 Selection in reference to biological groups IV. Application of selection index theory. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 22: 131-142.
15. GRIFFING, B., 1976a Selection in reference to biological groups. V. Analysis of full-sib groups. Genetics 82: 703-722.
16. GRIFFING, B., 1976b Selection in reference to biological groups. VI. Use of extreme forms of nonrandom groups to increase selection efficiency. Genetics 82: 723-731.
17. GRIFFING, B., 1989 Genetic analysis of plant mixtures. Genetics 122: 943-956.
18. HAMILTON, W. D., 1964 The genetical evolution of social behaviour I. J. Theor. Biol. 7: 1-16.
19. HAZEL, L. N., 1943 The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 28: 476-490.
20. HENDERSON, C. R., 1984 Applications of Linear Models in Animal Breeding. University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
21. KELLER, L., 1999 Levels of Selection in Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
22. KINGHORN, B., J. VAN DER WERF and M. RYAN, 2000 Animal Breeding, Use of New Technologies. The Post Graduate Foundation in Veterinarian Science of the University of Sydney, Sydney.
23. LYNCH, M., and B. WALSH, 1998 Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
24. MAYNARD-SMITH, J., 1976 Group selection. Q. Rev. Biol. 51: 277-283.
25. MOORE, A. J., 1990 The inheritance of social dominance, mating behaviour and attractiveness to mates in male Nauphoeta cinerea. Anim. Behav. 39: 388-397.
26. MOORE, A. J., E. D. BRODIE III and J. B. WOLF, 1997 Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process: I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution 51: 1352-1362.
27. MOORE, A. J., J. B. WOLF and E. D. BRODIE III, 1998 The influence of direct and indirect genetic effects on the evolution of behavior: social and sexual selection meet maternal effects, pp. 22-41 in Maternal Effects as Adaptations, edited by T. A. MOUSSEAU and C. W. FOX. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
28. MUIR, W. M., 1996 Group selection for adaptation to multiple-hen cages: selection program and direct responses. Poult. Sci. 75: 447-458.
29. MUIR, W. M., 2005 Incorporation of competitive effects in forest tree or animal breeding programs. Genetics 170: 1247-1259.
30. WADE, M. J., 1976 Group selection among laboratory populations of Tribolium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 73: 4604-4607.
31. WADE, M. J., 1977 An experimental study of group selection. Evolution 31: 134-153.
32. WADE, M. J., 1978 Kin selection: a classical approach and a general solution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75: 6154-6158.
33. WILLHAM, R. L., 1963 The covariance between relatives for characters composed of components contributed by related individuals. Biometrics 19: 18-27.
34. WILSON, D. S., 1977 Structured demes and the evolution of group advantageous traits. Am. Nat. 111: 157-185.
35. WOLF, J. B., 2003 Genetic architecture and evolutionary constraint when the environment contains genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 4655-4660.
36. WOLF, J. B., E. D. BRODIE III, J. M. CHEVERUD, A. J. MOORE and M. J. WADE, 1998 Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 64-69.
37. WOLF, J. B., E. D. BRODIE III and A. J. MOORE, 1999 Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. II. Selection resulting from social interactions. Am. Nat. 153: 254-266.