Hearing facial identities

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 60, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1446-1456

  Schweinberger, Stefan R ^b   Robertson, David ^a,b   Kaufmann, Jrgen M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; RECOGNITION; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMANS; MALE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 34548553142     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210601063589     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bruce, V., & Valentine, T. (1988). When a nod's as good as a wink. The role of dynamic information in facial recognition. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues: Vol. 1. Memory in everyday life (pp. 169-174). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
2. Calvert, G. A., Brammer, M. J., &lversen, S. D. (1998). Crossmodal identification. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 247-253.
3. Calvert, G. A., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M. J., Campbell, R., Williams, S. C. R., & McGuire, P. K (1997). Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading. Science, 276, 593-596.
4. de Gelder, B., & Vroomen, J. (2000a). Bimodal emotion perception: Integration across separate modalities, cross-modal perceptual grouping or perception of multimodal events? Cognition & Emotion, 14, 321-324.
5. de Gelder, B., & Vroomen, J. (2000b). The perception of emotions by ear and by eye. Cognition & Emotion, 14, 289-311.
6. Ellis, H. D.Jones, D. M., &Mosdell, N. (1997). Intraand inter-modal repetition priming of familiar faces and voices. British Journal of Psychology, 88,143-156.
7. Ghazanfar, A. A., Maier, J. X., Hoffman, K. L., & Logothetis, N. K. (2005). Multisensory integration of dynamic faces and voices in rhesus monkey auditory cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 5004-5012.
8. Green, K. P., & Kuhl, P. K. (1991). Integral processing of visual place and auditory voicing information during phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 278-288.
9. Green, K. P., Kuhl, P. K., Meltzoff, A. N., & Stevens, E. B. (1991). Integration speech information across talkers, gender, and sensory modality: Female faces and male voices in the McGurk effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 524-536.
10. Hanley, J. R., Smith, S. T., & Hadfield, J. (1998). I recognise you but I can't place you: An investigation of familiar-only experiences during tests of voice and face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 179-195.
11. Hanley, J. R., &Turner, J. M. (2000). Why are familiaronly experiences more frequent for voices than for faces? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 1105-1116.
12. Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. (1976). Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in randomized block and split-plot designs. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 69-82.
13. Kamachi, M., Hill, H., Lander, K., & VatikiotisBateson, E. (2003). "Putting the face to the voice": Matching identity across modality. Current Biology, 13,1709-1714.
14. Knight, B., & Johnston, A. (1997). The role of movement in face recognition. Visual Cognition, 4, 265-273.
15. Lachs, L., &Pisoni, D. B. (2004a). Cross-modal source information and spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 378-396.
16. Lachs, L., & Pisoni, D. B. (2004b). Crossmodal source identification in speech perception. Ecological Psychology, 16, 159-187.
17. Lander, K., & Bruce, V. (2000). Recognizing famous faces: Exploring the benefits of facial motion. Ecological Psychology, 12, 259-272.
18. Lander, K., & Chuang, L. (2005). Why are moving faces easier to recognize? Visual Cognition, 12, 429-442.
19. McGrath, M., & Summerfield, Q. (1985). Intermodal timing relations and audiovisual speech recognition by normal-hearing adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77, 678-685.
20. McGurk, H., & MacDonald,J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
21. Munhall, K. G., Gobble, P., Sacco, L., & Ward, M. (1996). Temporal constraints on the McGurk effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 351-362.
22. Munhall, K. G., & Vatikiotis-Bateson, E. (2004). Spatial and temporal constraints on audiovisual speech perception. In G. Calvert, C. Spence, & B. E. Stein (Eds.), The handbook of multisensory processes (pp. 177-188). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Rosenblum, L. D., Johnson, J. A., & Saldana, H. M. (1996). Point-light facial displays enhance comprehension of speech in noise. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1159-1170.
24. Rosenblum, L. D., & Saldana, H. M. (1996). An audiovisual test of kinematic primitives for visual speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 318-331.
25. Sams, M., Aulanko, R., Hämalainen, M., Hari, R., Lounasmaa, O. V., Lu, S.-T., et al. (1991). Seeing speech: Visual information from lip movements modifies activity in the human auditory cortex. Neuroscience Letters, 127, 141-145.
26. Schweinberger, S. R., Herholz, A., & Sommer, W. (1997a). Recognizing famous voices: Influence of stimulus duration and different types of retrievalcues. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 453-463.
27. Schweinberger, S. R., Herholz, A., & Stief, V. (1997b). Auditory long-term memory: Repetition priming of voice recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 498-517.
28. Schweinberger, S. R., & Soukup, G. R. (1998). Asymmetric relationships among perceptions of facial identity, emotion, and facial speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1748-1765.
29. Sekiyama, K. (1997). Cultural and linguistic factors in audiovisual speech processing: The McGurk effect in Chinese subjects. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 73-80.
30. Sheffert, S. M., & Olson, E. (2004). Audiovisual speech facilitates voice learning. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 352-362.
31. Soto-Faraco, S., & Kingstone, A. (2004). Multisensory integration of dynamic information. In G. Calvert, C. Spence, & B. E. Stein (Eds.), The handbook of multisensory processes (pp. 49-67). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,
32. van Wassenhove, V., Grant, K. W., & Poeppel, D. (2005). Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 1181-1.186.
33. von Kriegstein, K., Kleinschmidt, A., Sterzer, P., & Giraud, A. L. (2005). Interaction of face and voice areas during speaker recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 367-376.
34. Walker, S., Bruce, V., & O'Malley, C. (1995). Facial identity and facial speech processing: Familiar faces and voices in the McGurk effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1124-1133.
35. Welch, R. B., & Warren, D. H. (1980). Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 638-667.