A bias for looming stimuli to predominate in binocular rivalry

Vision Research

Volumn 47, Issue 20, 2007, Pages 2661-2674

  Parker, Amanda ^a   Alais, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Binocular rivalry; Exogenous attention; Expansion; Flash suppression; Global motion perception; Interocular suppression; Looming; Motion; Optic flow; Stimulus driven attention; Visual attention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ATTENTION; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; TIME FACTORS; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 34548488897     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.06.019     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Alais D., and Blake R. Neural strength of visual attention gauged by motion adaptation. Nature Neuroscience 2 11 (1999) 1015-1018
2. Alais D., and Blake R. Binocular rivalry (2005), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
3. Alais D., and Melcher D. Strength and coherence of binocular rivalry depends on shared stimulus complexity. Vision Research 47 2 (2007) 269-279
4. Alais D., and Parker A. Independent binocular rivalry processes for form and motion. Neuron 52 5 (2006) 911-920
5. Abrams R.A., and Christ S.E. The onset of receding motion captures attention: Comment on Franconeri and Simons (2003). Perception and Psychophysics 67 2 (2005) 219-223
6. Abrams R.A., and Christ S.E. Motion onset captures attention: A rejoinder to Franconeri and Simons (2005). Perception and Psychophysics 68 1 (2006) 114-117
7. Berman R.A., and Colby C.L. Auditory and visual attention modulate motion processing in area MT+. Cognitive Brain Research 14 (2002) 64-74
8. Blake R. A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review 96 1 (1989) 145-167
9. Blake R., and Logothetis N.K. Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3 1 (2002) 13-21
10. Blake R., Yu L., Lokey M., and Norman H. Binocular rivalry and motion perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10 1 (1998) 46-60
11. Bossink C.J.H., Stalmeier P.F.M., and de Weert C.M.M. A test of Levelt's Second proposition for binocular rivalry. Vision Research 33 10 (1993) 1413-1419
12. Brascamp J.W., van Ee R., Noest A.J., Jacobs R.H., and van den Berg A.V. The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise. Journal of Vision 6 (2006) 1244-1256
13. Breese B.B. Binocular rivalry. Psychological Review 16 (1909) 410-415
14. Chong S.C., and Blake R. Endogenous attention and exogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry. Vision Research 46 11 (2006) 1794-1803
15. Duffy C.J., and Wurtz R.H. Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity to large-field stimuli. Journal of Neurophysiology 65 6 (1991) 1346-1359
16. Fox R., and Herrmann J. Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations. Perception and Psychophysics 2 (1967) 432-436
17. Franconeri S.L., and Simons D.J. Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Perception and Psychophysics 65 7 (2003) 999-1010
18. Franconeri S.L., and Simons D.J. The dynamic events that capture visual attention: A reply to Abrams and Christ (2005). Perception and Psychophysics 67 6 (2005) 962-966
19. Freeman A. Multistage model for binocular rivalry. Journal of Neurophysiology 94 6 (2005) 4412-4420
20. Graziano M.S., Andersen R.A., and Snowden R.J. Tuning of MST neurons to spiral motions. Journal of Neuroscience 14 1 (1994) 54-67
21. Graziano M.S., and Cooke D.F. Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior. Neuropsychologica 44 13 (2006) 2621-2635
22. Haynes J.D., Deichmann R., and Rees G. Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature 438 7967 (2005) 496-499
23. Komatsu H., and Wurtz R.H. Relation of cortical areas MT and MST to pursuit eye movements. I. Localization and visual properties of neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology 60 2 (1988) 580-603
24. Lack L.C. Selective attention and the control of binocular rivalry (1978), Mouton, The Hague
25. Lee S.H., and Blake R. A fresh look at interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Vision Research 44 10 (2004) 983-991
26. Leopold D.A., and Logothetis N.K. What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?. Nature 380 6575 (1996) 621-624
27. Levelt W.J.M. On binocular rivalry (1965), Institute for Perception RVO-TNO, The Netherlands: Soesterberg
28. Lewis C.F., and McBeath M.K. Bias to experience approaching motion in a three-dimensional virtual environment. Perception 33 (2004) 259-276
29. Logothetis N.K., and Schall J.D. Neuronal correlates of subjective visual pereption. Science 245 4919 (1989) 761-763
30. Maier J.X., Neuhoff J.G., Logothetis N.K., and Ghazanfar A.A. Multisensory integration of looming signals by rhesus monkeys. Neuron 43 2 (2004) 177-181
31. McAdams C.J., and Maunsell J.H. Effects of attention on orientation-tuning functions of single neurons in macaque cortical area V4. Journal of Neuroscience 19 1 (1999) 431-441
32. Meng M., and Tong F. Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision 4 7 (2004) 539-551
33. Mitchell J.F., Stoner G.R., and Reynolds J.H. Object based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry. Nature 429 6990 (2004) 410-413
34. Nguyen V.A., Freeman A.W., and Alais D. Increasing depth of binocular rivalry suppression along two visual pathways. Vision Research 43 19 (2003) 2003-2008
35. O'Craven K.M., Rosen B.R., Kwong K.K., Treisman A., and Savoy R.L. Voluntary attention modulates fMRI activity in human MT-MST. Neuron 18 4 (1997) 591-598
36. Ooi T.L., and He Z.J. Binocular rivalry and visual awareness: the roles of attention. Perception 28 5 (1999) 551-574
37. Ooi T.L., and He Z.J. A distributed intercortical processing of binocular rivalry: psychophysical evidence. Perception 32 2 (2003) 155-166
38. Paffen C.E.L., Alais D., and Verstraten F.A.J. Attention speeds binocular rivalry. Psychological Science 17 9 (2006) 752-756
39. Pasley B.N., Mayes L.C., and Schultz R.T. Subcortical discrimination of unperceived objects during binocular rivalry. Neuron 42 1 (2004) 163-172
40. Polonsky A., Blake R., Braun J., and Heeger D.J. Neuronal activity in human primary cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience 3 11 (2000) 1153-1159
41. Sheinberg D.L., and Logothetis N.K. The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organisation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 94 7 (1997) 3408-3413
42. Somers D.C., Dale A.M., Seiffert A.E., and Tootell R.B. Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 96 4 (1999) 1663-1668
43. Tong F., and Engel S.A. Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature 411 6834 (2001) 195-199
44. Treue S., and Martinez-Trujillo J.C. Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex. Nature 399 6736 (1999) 575-579
45. Treue S., and Maunsell J.H. Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST. Nature 382 6591 (1996) 539-541
46. Wade N.J., and de Weert C.M. Binocular rivalry with rotary and radial motions. Perception 15 4 (1986) 435-442
47. Walker P., and Powell D.J. The sensitivity of binocular rivalry to changes in the non-dominant stimulus. Vision Research 19 3 (1979) 247-249
48. Watson A.B., and Pelli D.G. QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception and Psychophysics 33 2 (1983) 113-120
49. Wilson H.R. Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. PNAS 100 24 (2003) 14499-14503
50. Wolfe J.M. Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash. Vision Research 24 5 (1984) 471-478
51. Wunderlich K., Schneider K.A., and Kastner S. Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature Neuroscience 8 11 (2005) 1595-1602