Evaluation of product performance in product family design re-use

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 45, Issue 18-19, 2007, Pages 4119-4141

  Xu, Q L ^a   Ong, S K ^a   Nee, A Y C ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Design re use; Information content; Product evaluation; Product family

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PRODUCT DESIGN; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; USABILITY ENGINEERING;

DESIGN RE-USE; INFORMATION CONTENT; PRODUCT EVALUATION; PRODUCT FAMILY;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 34548457726     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207540701440147     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Alting, L. and Legarth, J.B., Life cycle engineering and design. Ann. CIRP, 1995, 44(2), 569-580.
2. Andersson, J. and Wallace, D., Pareto optimisation using the struggle genetic crowding algorithm. Eng. Opt., 2002, 34, 623-644.
3. Asiedu, Y. and Gu, P., Product life cycle cost analysis: state of the art review. Int. J. Prod. Res., 1998, 36(4), 883-908.
4. Bahrami, A., Routine design with information content and fuzzy quality function deployment. J. Intell. Manuf., 1994, 5(4), 203-210.
5. Bovea, M.D. and Wang, B., Identifying environmental improvement options by combining life cycle assessment and fuzzy set theory. Int. J. Prod. Res., 2003, 41(3), 593-609.
6. Chen, W, Allen, J.K., Mavris, D.N. and Mistree, F., A concept exploration method for determining robust top-level specifications. Eng. Opt., 1996, 26, 137-158.
7. Chidambaram, B. and Agogino, A.M., Catalog-based customisation, in Proceedings of 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences - Design Automation Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, Paper No. DETC99/DAC-8675, 1999.
8. Collier, D.A., The measurement and benefits of component part commonality. Des. Sci., 1981, 12, 85-96.
9. Erens, F.J., McKay, A. and Bloor, S., Product modeling using multiple levels of abstraction instances as types. Comput. Ind., 1994, 24(1), 17-28.
10. Faiz, A., Weaver, C.S. and Walsh, M.P., Air Pollution from Motor Vehicles: Standards and Technologies for Controlling Emissions, 1996 (World Bank Publications: Washington, DC).
11. Fiksel, J., Design for Environment, Creating Eco-Efficient Products and Process, 1996 (McGraw-Hill: New York, NY).
12. Fujita, K., Sakaguchi, H., Akagi, S. and Yoneda, T., Product variety development and its optimisation under modular architecture and module commonalisation, in Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Las Vegas, Nevada, Paper No. DETC99/DFM-8923, 1999.
13. Fujita, K. and Yoshioka, S., Optimal design methodology of common components for a class of products: Its foundations and promise, in Proceedings of 2003 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conferences, Chicago, Illinois, Paper No. DETC2003/DAC-4871, 2003.
14. Gu, P., Hasnemian, M. and Nee, A.Y.C., Adaptable design. Ann. CIRP, 2004, 53(2), 539-557.
15. Hata, T., Kimura, F. and Suzuki, H., Product life cycle design based on deterioration simulation. In Life Cycle Networks, 4th CIRP International Seminar on Life Cycle Engineering, edited by F.-L. Krause and G. Seliger, pp. 59-68, 1997 (Chapman & Hall: London).
16. Hundal, M.S., Systematic Mechanical Designing: A Cost and Management Perspective, 1997 (ASME Press: New York, NY).
17. Ishii, K., Life-cycle engineering design. J. Mech. Des., 1995, 117, 42-47.
18. Jackson, M., Innovative Energy and Environmental Applications, 1993 (Fairmont Press: Lilburn, GA. Distributed by PTR Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
19. Jiao, J. and Tseng, M.M., Fuzzy ranking for conceptual evaluation in configuration design for mass customisation. Conc. Eng.: Res. Appl., 1998, 6(3), 189-206.
20. Jiao, J. and Tseng, M.M., An information modeling framework for product families to support mass customisation production. Ann. CIRP, 1999, 48(1), 93-98.
21. Jiao, J. and Tseng, M.M., Customisability analysis in design for mass customisation. CAD, 2004, 36, 745-757.
22. Johnson, M.R. and Wang, M.H., Economical evaluation of disassembly operations for recycling, remanufacturing and reuse. Int. J. Prod. Res., 1998, 36(12), 3227-3252.
23. Jovane, F., Alting, L., Armillotta, A., Eversheim, W., Feldmann, K., Seliger, G. and Roth, N., A key issue in product life cycle: disassembly. Ann. CIRP, 1993, 42(2), 651-658.
24. Kara, S., Mazhar, M., Kaebernick, H. and Ahmed, A., Determining the reuse potential of components based on life cycle data. Ann. CIRP, 2005, 54(1), 1-4.
25. Kimura, F., Hata, T. and Zuzuki, H., Product quality evaluation based on behaviour simulation of used products. Ann. CIRP, 1998, 47(1), 119-122.
26. Kimura, F., Kato, S., Hata, T. and Masuda, T., Product modularisation for parts reuse in inverse manufacturing. Ann. CIRP, 2001, 50(1), 89-92.
27. Kimura, F. and Nielsen, J., A design method for product family under manufacturing resource constraints. Ann. CIRP, 2005, 54(1), 139-142.
28. Koren, Y., Heisel, U., Jovane, F., Moriwaki, T., Pritschow, G., Ulsoy, G. and Van Brussel, H., Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Ann. CIRP, 1999, 48(2), 527-540.
29. Krishnan, V. and Gupta, S., Appropriateness and impact of platform-based product development. Manage. Sci., 2001, 47(1), 52-68.
30. Mangun, D. and Thurston, D.L., Incorporating component reuse, remanufacture, and recycle into product portfolio design. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 2002, 49(4), 479-490.
31. McAdams, D.A., Stone, R.B. and Wood, K.L., Function interdependence and product similarity based on customer needs. Res. Eng. Des., 1999, 11, 1-19.
32. Meyer, M.H. and Lehnerd, A.P., The Power of Product Platforms-Building Value and Cost Leadership, 1997 (The Free Press: New York, NY).
33. Nelson, S.A. II, Parkinson, M.B. and Papalambros, P.Y., Multicriteria optimisation in product platform design. J. Mech. Des., 2001, 23(2), 199-204.
34. Okumura, S., Morikuni, T. and Okino, N., Environmental effects of physical life span of a reusable unit following functional and physical failures in a remanufacturing system. Int. J. Prod. Res., 2003, 41(16), 3667-3687.
35. Park, J. and Simpson, T.W., Development of a production cost estimation framework to support product family design. Int. J. Prod. Res., 2005, 43(4), 731-772.
36. Pine, B.J., Mass Customisation: The New Frontier in Business Competition, 1993 (Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA).
37. Rezayat, M., Knowledge-based product development using XML and KCs. CAD, 2000, 32, 299-309.
38. Siddall, J.N., Probabilistic Engineering Design: Principles and Applications, 1983 (Marcel Dekker: New York, NY).
39. Siddique, Z. and Repphun, B., Estimating cost savings when implementing a product platform approach. Conc. Eng.: Res. Appl., 2001, 9(4), 285-294.
40. Siddique, Z. and Rosen, D.W., On combinatorial design spaces for the configuration design of product families. AIEDAM, 2001, 15(2), 91-108.
41. Simpson, T.W., A concept exploration method for product family design. PhD dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1998.
42. Simpson, T.W., Chen, W., Allen, J.K. and Mistree, F., Designing ranged sets of top-level design specifications for a family of aircraft: an application of design capability indices, in SAE World Aviation Congress and Exposition, Anaheim, CA, AIAA-97-5513, 1997.
43. Simpson, T.W., Product platform design and customisation: status and promise. AIEDAM, 2004, 18, 3-20.
44. Smith, J.S., A multiple viewpoint modular design methodology. PhD dissertation, Department of Design, Manufacturing and Engineering Management, University of Strathclyde, UK, 2002.
45. Stone, R.B., Wood, K.L. and Crawford, R.H., A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures. Des. Stud., 2000, 21, 5-31.
46. Suh, N.P., Axiomatic Design - Advances and Applications, 2001 (Oxford University Press: New York, NY).
47. Ulrich, K., The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy, 1995, 24, 419-440.
48. Ulrich, K. and Eppinger, S., Product Design and Development, 3rd ed., 2004 (Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin).
49. Weber, A., Plastics in automotive engineering: use and reuse. Mater. Des., 1991, 12(4), 199-208.
50. Wenzel, H., Hauschild, M.Z., Jørgensen, J. and Alting, L., Environmental tools in product development, in IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, San Francisco, CA, 1994, pp. 100-108.
51. Xu, Q.L., Ong, S.K. and Nee, A.Y.C., Function-based design synthesis approach to design reuse. Res. Eng. Des., 2006, 17(1), 27-44.
52. Yu, T., Yassine, A. and Goldberg, D., A genetic algorithm for developing modular product architectures, in Proceedings of ASME 2003 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conferences, Chicago, Illinois, Paper No. DETC2003/DTM-48657, September 2003.
53. Zhang, Y., Wang, B. and Zhang, C., Green QFD-II: a life cycle approach for environmentally conscious manufacturing by integrating LCA and LCC into QFD matrices. Int. J. Prod. Res., 1999, 37(5), 1075-1091.