Bias magnification in ecologic studies: A methodological investigation

Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source

Volumn 6, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Webster, Thomas F ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTRIBUTABLE RISK; CONFOUNDING BY GROUP; ECOLOGY; EFFECT MEASURE MODIFICATION BY GROUP; EXPOSURE VARIABLE; METHODOLOGY; NON DIFFERENTIAL EXPOSURE MISCLASSIFICATION; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ECOLOGY; EFFECT MODIFIERS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; EPIDEMIOLOGIC RESEARCH DESIGN; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK;

EID: 34548456895     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1476069X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-6-17     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. JM Last, A Dictionary of Epidemiology New York, NY: Oxford University Press Third 1995
2. Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. AV Diez-Roux, Am J Public Health 1998 88 216 222 9491010
3. Ecologic versus individual-level sources of bias in ecologic estimates of contextual health effects. S Greenland, Intern J Epidemiol 2001 30 1343 1350 10.1093/ije/30.6.1343
4. Cross-level bias in partially ecologic studies. T Webster, Spatial Epidemiology Conference, London 2006: Conference Proceedings. 23-25 May London. Small Area Health Statistics Unit, Imperial College 2006 127 132 http://www.spatepiconf.org/default.htm
5. Improving ecological inference using individual-level data. C Jackson N Best S Richardson, Statist Med 2006 25 2136 2159 10.1002/sim.2370
6. The semi-individual study in air pollution epidemiology: a valid design as compared to ecologic studies. N Künzli IB Tager, Environ Health Perspect 1997 105 1078 1083 9349825 10.2307/3433849
7. Divergent biases in ecologic and individual-level studies. S Greenland, Stat Med 1992 11 1209 1223 10.1002/sim.4780110907 1509221
8. Ecologic studies. H Morgenstern, Modern Epidemiology Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Second 1998 459 480
9. Comparison of relative risks obtained in ecological and individual studies: some methodological considerations. S Richardson I Stücker D Hémon, Int J Epidemiol 1987 16 111 120 10.1093/ije/16.1.111 3570609
10. G King, A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 1997
11. Bias in Ecologic and Semi-individual Studies. T Webster, DSc thesis Boston University School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health 2000
12. The logic in ecological: I. The logic of analysis. M Susser, Am J Public Health 1994 84 825 829 8179056
13. Ecological regressions and the behavior of individuals. LA Goodman, Am Sociol Rev 1953 18 663 664 10.2307/2088121
14. Ecological inference for 2 × 2 tables. J Wakefield, J R Statist Soc A 2004 167 385 445 10.1111/j.1467-985x.2004.02046_1.x
15. Ecological bias, confounding, and effect modification. S Greenland H Morgenstern, Int J Epidemiol 1989 18 269 274 10.1093/ije/18.1.269 2656561
16. Ecological Inference, Aggregate Data Analysis of United States Elections, and the Socialist Party of America. BL Palmquist, PhD thesis University of California Berkeley, Political Science Department 1993
17. Ecological correlation and the behavior of individuals. WS Robinson, Am Sociol Rev 1950 15 351 357 10.2307/2087176
18. OD Duncan RP Cuzzort D Duncan, Statistical Geography: Problems in Analyzing Areal Data Glencoe, IL: Free Press 1961
19. The ecological fallacy. S Piantadosi DP Byar SB Green, Am J Epidemiol 1988 127 893 904 3282433
20. Effects of nondifferential exposure misclassification in ecologic studies. H Brenner DA Savitz K-H Jöckel S Greenland, Am J Epidemiol 1992 135 85 95 1736664
21. Sensitivity analysis for ecological regression. J Wakefield, Biometrics 2003 59 9 17 10.1111/1541-0420.00002 12762436
22. Commentary: Does the spectre of ecologic bias haunt epidemiology? T Webster, Int J Epidemiol 2002 31 161 162 10.1093/ije/31.1.161 11914313
23. Parallel analysis of individual and ecologic data on residential radon, cofactors, and lung cancer in Sweden. F Lagarde G Pershagen, Am J Epidemiol 1999 149 268 274 9927223
24. Effects of systematic exposure assessment errors in partially ecologic case-control studies. J Björk U Strömberg, Int J Epidemiol 2002 31 154 160 10.1093/ije/31.1.154 11914312
25. Estimation of population exposure in ecological studies. M Plummer D Clayton, J R Statist Soc B 1996 58 113 126
26. Ecological Regression Analysis of Environmental Benzene Exposure and Childhood Leukaemia: Sensitivity to Data Inaccuracies, Geographical Scale and Ecological Bias. N Best S Cockings J Bennett J Wakefield P Elliott, J R Statist Soc A 2001 164 155 174 10.1111/1467-985X.00194
27. Ecological correlation studies. S Richardson C Montfort, Spatial Epidemiology: Methods and Applications Oxford: Oxford University Press, Elliott P, Wakefield JC, Best NG, Briggs DJ, 2000 205 220