Psychometric characteristics of the Brazilian-Portuguese versions of the Functional Rating Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire

Spine

Volumn 32, Issue 17, 2007, Pages 1902-1907

  Costa, Leonardo Oliveira Pena ^a,b   Maher, Chris G ^a   Latimer, Jane ^a   Ferreira, Paulo Henrique ^a,c   Pozzi, Giovanni Campos ^b   Ribeiro, Rodrigo Nogueira ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Construct validity; Functional Rating Index; Functional status; Low back pain; Portuguese version; Reliability; Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL RATING INDEX; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; SELF REPORT; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADULT; BRAZIL; COMPREHENSION; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PORTUGAL; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 34548447169     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31811eab33     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Costa LOP, Maher CG, Latimer J. Self-report outcome measures for low back pain: searching for international cross-cultural adaptations. Spine 2007;32:1028-37.
2. Nusbaum L, Natour J, Ferraz MB, et al. Translation, adaptation and validation of the Roland Morris questionnaire-Brazil Roland Morris. Braz J Med Biol Res 2001;34:203-10.
3. Feise JF, Menke M. Functional Rating Index: a new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions. Spine 2001;26:78-87.
4. Ceran F, Özcan A. The relationship of the Functional Rating Index with disability, pain, and quality of life in patients with low back pain. Med Sci Monit 2006;12:435-9.
5. Fairbank JCT, Couper J, Davies JB. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980;66:271-3.
6. Vernon H, Mior S. The neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1991;14:409-18.
7. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981;19:787-805.
8. Bejia I, Younes M, Kamel BS, et al. Validation of the Tunisian version of the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Eur Spine J 2005;14:171-4.
9. Tsang RCC. Measurement properties of the Hong Kong Chinese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Hong Kong Physiother J 2004;22:40-9.
10. Chen SM, Liu MF, Wang BM, et al. Chinese translation and adaptation of the Roland-Morris Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. FJPT 2003;28:324-32.
11. Albert HB, Jensen AM, Dahl D, et al. Criteria validation of the Roland Morris questionnaire: a Danish translation of the international scale for the assessment of functional level in patients with low back pain and sciatica. Ugeskr Laeger 2003;165:1875-80.
12. Brouwer S, Kuijer W, Dijkstra P, et al. Reliability and stability of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:162-5.
13. Coste J, Le Parc JM, Berge E, et al. French validation of a disability rating scale for the evaluation of low back pain (EIFEL questionnaire). Rev Rhumatisme 1993;60:335-41.
14. Wiesinger GF, Nuhr M, Quittan M, et al. Cross cultural adaptation of the Roland Morris questionnaire for German-speaking patients with low back pain. Spine 1999;24:1099-103.
15. Boscainos PJ, Sapkas G, Stilianessi E, et al. Greek versions of the Oswestry and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaires. Clin Orthop 2003;411:40-53.
16. Padua R, Padua L, Ceccarelli E, et al. Italian version of the Roland Disability Questionnaire, specific for low back pain: cross cultural adaptation and validation. Eur Spine J 2002;11:126-9.
17. Fujiwara A, Kobayashi N, Saiki K, et al. Association of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score with the Oswestry Disability Index, Roland Morris Questionnaire and Short Form 36. Spine 2003;28:1601-7.
18. Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index. J Rehabil Med 2003;35:214-47.
19. Kovacs FM, Llobera J, Gil Del Real MT, et al. Validation of the Spanish version of the Roland Morris questionnaire. Spine 2002;27:538-42.
20. Johansson E, Lindberg P. Subacute and chronic low back pain: reliability and validity of a Swedish version of the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire. Scand J Rehabil Med 1998;30:139-43.
21. Jirarattanaphochai J, Jung S, Sumananont C, et al. Reliability of the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (Thai version) for the evaluation of low back pain patients. J Med Assoc Thai 2005;88:407-11.
22. Kucukdeveci AA, Tennant A, Elhan AH, et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire for use in low back pain. Spine 2001;26:2738-3743.
23. Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Mehdian H, et al. The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions. Spine 2006;31:E454-9.
24. Chansirinukor W, Maher CG, Latimer J, et al. Comparison of the Functional Rating Scale and the 18-Item Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire: responsiveness and reliability. Spine 2004;30:141-5.
25. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000;25:3186-91.
26. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria are proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34-42.
27. Roland M, Morris R. A study of natural history of back pain: Part 1. Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine 1983;8:141-4.
28. Deyo RA. Comparative validity of the Sickness Impact Profile and shorter scales for functional assessment in low back pain. Spine 1986;9:951-4.
29. Kopec KA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: measurement properties. Spine 1995;20:341-52.
30. Stratford PW, Finch F, Solomon P. Using Roland Morris scale to make decisions about individual patients. Physiother Can 1996;48:107-10.
31. Stratford PW, Binkley JM. A comparison study of the Back Pain Functional Scale and Roland Morris Questionnaire: North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network. J Rheumatol 2000;27:1928-36.
32. Patrick DL, Deyo RA, Atlas SJ. Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine 1995;20:1899-908.
33. Underwood MR, Barnett AG, Vickers MR. Evaluation of two time specific low back pain outcome measures. Spine 1999;24:1104-12.
34. Jacob T, Baras M, Zeev A, et al. Low back pain: reliability of a set of pain measurement tools. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:735-42.
35. Jensen AM, Strom SE, Turner JA, et al. Validity of the Sickness Impact Roland scale as a measure of dysfunction in chronic pain patients. Pain 1992;50:157-62.
36. Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL. Development and initial validation of the Back Pain Functional Scale. Spine 2000;25:2095-102.
37. Davidson M, Keating JL. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther 2002;82:8-24.
38. Bayar B, Bayar K, Yakut E, et al. Reliability and validity of the Functional Rating Index in older people with low back pain: preliminary report. Aging Clin Exp Res 2004;16:49-52.
39. Childs JD, Piva SR. Psychometric properties of the functional rating index in patients with low back pain. Eur Spine J 2005;14:1008-12.