Secondary indirect effects in gravity anomaly data inversion or interpretation

Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Volumn 112, Issue 6, 2007, Pages

  Vajda, Peter ^a   Vanicek P ^b   Novak P ^c   Tenzer, R ^d   Ellmann, Artu ^e  

^a INSTITUTE OF CHEMISTRY   (Slovakia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

^c RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF GEODESY   (Czech Republic)

^d DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^e TALLINN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Estonia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUGUER ANOMALY; DATA INTERPRETATION; DATA INVERSION; DATABASE; GEOPHYSICS; GRAVIMETRY; GRAVITY ANOMALY; INVERSE ANALYSIS; TOPOGRAPHY;

NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 34548445882     PISSN: 21699313     EISSN: 21699356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2006JB004470     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ardalan, A. A., and E. W. Grafarend (2001), Somigliana-Pizzetti gravity: The international gravity formula accurate to the sub-nanoGal level, J. Geod., 75(7-8), 424-437.
2. Blakely, R. J. (1995), Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
3. Chapman, M. E., and J. H. Bodine (1979), Considerations of the indirect effect in marine gravity modelling, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 3889-3892.
4. Grant, F. S., and G. F. West (1965), Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
5. Hackney, R. I., and W. E. Featherstone (2003), Geodetic versus geophysical perspectives of the 'gravity anomaly', Geophys. J. Int., 154, 35-43, doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01941.x, Corrigendum (2006), Geophys. J. Int., 167(2), 585-585, doi:10.1111/ j.1365-246X.2006.03035.x.
6. Heiskanen, W. A., and, H. Moritz (1967), Physical Geodesy, W. H. Freeman, New York.
7. Hinze, W. J., et al. (2005), New standards for reducing gravity data: The North American gravity database, Geophysics, 70(4), J25-J32; doi:10.1190/1.1988183.
8. Jung, W. Y., and P. D. Rabinowitz (1988), Application of the indirect effect on regional gravity fields in the North Atlantic Ocean, Mar. Geod., 12, 127-133.
9. Kellogg, O. D. (1929), Foundations of Potential Theory, Springer, New York.
10. LaFehr, T. R. (1991), Standardization in gravity reduction, Geophysics, 56(8), 1170-1178, doi:10.1190/1.1443137.
11. Li, X., and H. J. Götze (2001), Ellipsoid, geoid, gravity, geodesy and geophysics, Geophysics, 66(6), 1660-1668, doi:10.1190/ 1.1487109.
12. MacMillan, W. D. (1930), Theoretical Mechanics Vol. 2: The Theory of the Potential, McGraw-Hill, New York.
13. Meurers, B. (1992), Untersuchungen zur Bestimmung und Analyse des Schwerefeldes im Hochgebirge am Beispiel der Ostalpen (in German), Österr. Beitr. Met. Geoph., 6, 146 p.
14. Molodenskij, M. S., V. F. Eremeev, and M. I. Yurkina (1960), Methods for study of the external gravitational field and figure of the Earth, Translated from Russian by Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Oftice of Technical Services, Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D C, 1962.
15. Moritz, H. (1980), Advanced Physical Geodesy, Abacus Press, Tunbridge Wells.
16. Moritz, H. (1990), The Figure of the Earth, Wichmann, Karlsruhe.
17. Novák, P., and E. W. Grafarend (2005), Ellipsoidal representation of the topographic potential and its vertical gradient, J. Geod., 78(11-12), 691-706, doi:10.1007/s00190-005-0435-4.
18. Talwani, M. (1998), Errors in the total Bouguer reduction, Geophysics, 63(4), 1125-1130, doi:10.1190/1.1444412.
19. Torge, W. (2001), Geodesy, 3rd ed., Walter de Gruyter, New York.
20. Tscherning, C. C., and H. Sünkel (1980), A method for the construction of spheroidal mass distribution consistent with the harmonic part of the earth's gravity potential, Proceedings 4th International Symposium "Geodesy and Physics of the earth", Zentralinstitut für Physik der Erde, Report 63/II, p. 481-500.
21. Vajda, P., and J. Pánisova (2005), Practical comparison of formulae for computing normal gravity at the observation point with emphasis on the territory of Slovakia, Contrib. Geophys. Geod., 35(2), 173-188.
22. Vajda, P., P. Vaníček, P. Novák, and B. Meurers (2004), On evaluation of Newton integrals in geodetic coordinates: Exact formulation and spherical approximation, Contrib. Geophys. Geod., 34(5), 289-314.
23. Vajda, P., P. Vaníček, and B. Meurers (2006), A new physical foundation for anomalous gravity, Stud. Geophys. Geod., 50(2), 189-216, doi:10.1007/s11200-606-0012-1.
24. Vaníček, P., and E. J. Krakiwsky (1986), Geodesy: The Concepts, 2nd ed., Elsevier, New York.
25. Vaníček, P., J. Huang, P. Novák, S. Pagiatakis, M. Véronneau, Z. Martinec, and W. E. Featherstone (1999), Determination of the boundary values for the Stokes-Helmert problem, J. Geod., 73(4), 180-192, doi:10.1007/s001900050235.
26. Vaníček, P., R. Tenzer, L. E. Sjöberg, Z. Martinec, and W. E. Featherstone (2004), New views of the spherical Bouguer gravity anomaly, Geophys. J. Int., 159(2), 460-472, doi:10.1111/ j.1365-246X.2004,02435.x.
27. Vogel, A. (1982), Synthesis instead of reductions - New approaches to gravity interpretations, in Earth Evolution Sciences, 2 Vieweg, Wiesbaden, Germany, p. 117-120.