A new physical foundation for anomalous gravity

Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 189-216

  Vajda, Peter ^a   Vanicek P ^b   Meurers, Bruno ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF CHEMISTRY   (Slovakia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Disturbance; Geophysical indirect effect; Gravimetric inverse problem; NETC space; Topographical correction

Indexed keywords

GEOID; GRAVIMETRY; GRAVITY ANOMALY; INVERSE PROBLEM;

EID: 33646750097     PISSN: 00393169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11200-006-0012-1     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Blakely R.J., 1995. Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.
2. Bomford G., 1971. Geodesy, 3rd Edition. Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.
3. Chapman M.E. and Bodine J.H., 1979. Considerations of the indirect effect in marine gravity modelling. J. Geophys. Res., 84, 3889-3892.
4. Grant F.S. and West G.F., 1965. Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, USA.
5. Hackney R.I. and Featherstone W.E., 2003. Geodetic versus Geophysical Perspectives of the 'Gravity Anomaly' Geophys. J. Int., 154, 35-43.
6. Heiskanen W.A. and Moritz H., 1967. Physical Geodesy. Freeman, San Francisco, USA.
7. Jekeli C. and Serpas J.G., 2003. Review and numerical assessment of the direct topographical reduction in geoid determination. J. Geodesy, 77, 226-239.
8. Jung W.Y. and Rabinowitz P.D., 1988. Application of the indirect effect on regional gravity fields in the North Atlantic Ocean. Marine Geodesy, 12, 127-133.
9. Kellogg O.D., 1929. Foundations of Potential Theory. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
10. MacMillan W.D., 1930. Theoretical Mechanics Vol. 2: The Theory of the Potential. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA (New York, Dover Publications, 1958).
11. Meurers B., 1992. Untersuchungen zur Bestimmung und Analyse des Schwerefeldes im Hochgebirge am Beispiel der Ostalpen. Österr. Beitr. Met. Geoph., 6, 146 pp.
12. Molodensky M.S., Yeremeev V.F. and Yurkina M.I., 1960. Methods for Study of the External Gravitational Field and Figure of the Earth. TRUDY TsNIIGAiK, Geodezizdat, Moscow (in Russian, English transl.: Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 1962, 248 pp.).
13. Moritz H., 1980. Advanced Physical Geodesy. Abacus Press, Tunbridge Wells, U.K.
14. Moritz H., 1990. The Figure of the Earth. Wichmann Verlag, Karlsruhe, Germany.
15. Novák P. and Grafarend E.W., 2005. Ellipsoidal representation of the topographical potential and its vertical gradient. J. Geodesy, 78, 691-706.
16. Pick M., Pícha J. and Vyskočil V., 1973. Theory of the Earth's Gravity Field. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
17. Somigliana C., 1929. Teoria generale del campo gravitazionale dell' ellisoide di rotazione. Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital., IV.
18. Talwani M., 1998. Errors in the total Bouguer reduction. Geophysics, 63, 1125-1130.
19. Torge W., 2001. Geodesy, 3 rd Edition. Walter de Gruyter Inc., Berlin, New York.
20. Tscherning C.C. and Sünkel H., 1980. A method for the construction of spheroidal mass distribution consistent with the harmonic part of the earth's gravity potential. Report 63/II, Zentralinstitut für Physik der Erde, Potsdam, Germany, 481-500.
21. Vajda P., Vaníček P., Novák P. and Meurers B., 2004. On evaluation of Newton integrals in geodetic coordinates: Exact formulation and spherical approximation. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy, 34, 289-314.
22. Vajda P. and Pánisová J., 2005. Practical comparison of formulae for computing normal gravity at the observation point with emphasis on the territory of Slovakia. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy, 35, 173-188.
23. Vaníček P. and Krakiwsky E.J., 1986. Geodesy: The Concepts, 2nd Rev. Edition, North-Holland P.C., Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
24. Vaníček P. and Martinec Z., 1994. Stokes-Helmert scheme for the evaluation of a precise geoid. Manuscripta Geodaetica, 19, 119-128.
25. Vaníček P., Huang J., Novák P., Pagiatakis S., Véronneau M., Martinec Z. and Featherstone W.E., 1999. Determination of the boundary values for the Stokes-Helmert problem. J. Geodesy, 73, 180-192.
26. Vaníček P., Tenzer R., Sjöberg L.E., Martinec Z. and Featherstone W.E., 2004. New views of the spherical Bouguer gravity anomaly. Geoph. J. Int., 159, 460-472.
27. Vogel A., 1982: Synthesis instead of reductions-New approaches to gravity interpretations. Earth evolution sciences, 2 Vieweg, Braunschweig, Germany, 117-120.