Stepwise advancement versus maximum jumping with headgear activator

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 283-293

  Wey, Mang Chek ^a   Bendeus, Margareta ^a   Li, Peng ^b   Hägg, Urban ^a   Rabie, A Bakr M ^a   Robinson, Wayne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HEAD; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE RECONSTRUCTION; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; EXTRAORAL TRACTION APPLIANCES; FEMALE; HEAD; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34548442946     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjm018     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Altenburger E, Ingervall B 1998 The initial effects of the treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusions with the van Beek activator compared with the effects of the Herren activator and an activator-headgear combination. European Journal of Orthodontics 20: 389-397
2. Banks P, Wright J, O'Brien K 2004 Incremental versus maximum bite advancement during twin-block therapy: a randomized controlled clinical trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 126: 583-588
3. Basciftci F A, Uysal T, Buyukerkmen A, Sari Z 2003 The effects of activator treatment on the craniofacial structures of Class II division 1 patients. European Journal of Orthodontics 25: 87-93
4. Bendeus M, Hägg U, Rabie B 2002 Growth and treatment changes in patients treated with a headgear-activator appliance. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 121: 376-384
5. Björk A 1947 The face in profile: an anthropological X-ray investigation on Swedish children and conscripts. Berlingska Boktryckeriet, Lund, Sweden
6. Bookstein F L 1997 Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometries of group differences in outline shape. Medical Image Analysis 1: 225-243
7. Brandão M, Pinho H S, Urias D 2006 Clinical and quantitative assessment of headgear compliance: a pilot study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 129: 230-244
8. Chayanupatkul A, Rabie A B, Hägg U 2003 Temporomandibular response to early and late removal of bite-jumping devices. European Journal of Orthodontics 25: 465-470
9. Dermaut L R, van den Eynde F, de Pauw G 1992 Skeletal and dento-alveolar changes as a result of headgear activator therapy related to different vertical growth patterns. European Journal of Orthodontics 14: 140-146
10. Du X, Hägg U, Rabie A B 2002 Effects of headgear Herbst and mandibular step-by-step advancement versus conventional Herbst appliance and maximal jumping of the mandible. European Journal of Orthodontics 24: 167-174
11. Ghafari J, King G J, Tulloch J F 1998 Early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion - comparison of alternative treatment modalities. Clinical Orthodontics and Research 1: 107-117
12. Graber T M, Rakosi T, Petrovic A G 1997 Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances. Mosby, St Louis
13. Hägg U, Du X, Rabie AB 2002 Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 122: 477-485
14. Hägg U, Du X, Rabie A B, Bendeus M 2003 What does headgear add to Herbst treatment and to retention? Seminars in Orthodontics 9: 57-66
15. Haralabakis N B, Halazonetis D J, Sifakakis I B 2003 Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 123: 296-305
16. Illing H M, Morris D O, Lee R T 1998 A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I - the hard tissues. European Journal of Orthodontics 20: 501-516
17. Jakobsson S O, Paulin G 1990 The influence of activator treatment on skeletal growth in Angle Class II:1 cases. A roentgenocephalometric study. European Journal of Orthodontics 12: 174-184
18. Keeling S D et al. 1998 Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 113: 40-50
19. Lau J W, Hägg U 1999 Cephalometric morphology of Chinese with Class II division 1 malocclusion, British Dental Journal 186: 188-190
20. Meikle M C 2005 What do prospective randomized clinical trials tell us about the treatment of Class II malocclusions? A personal viewpoint. European Journal of Orthodontics 27: 105-114
21. Nelson C, Harkness M, Herbison P 1993 Mandibular changes during functional appliance treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 104: 153-161
22. O'Brien K et al. 2003a Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1 : dental and skeletal effects. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 124: 234-243; quiz 339
23. O'Brien K et al. 2003b Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or Twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Part 2. Psychosocial effects. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 124: 128-137
24. Ömblus J, Malmgren O, Pancherz H, Hägg U, Hansen K 1997 Long term effects of Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy. European Journal of Orthodontics 19: 85-193
25. Pancherz H 1979 Treatment of Class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation. American Journal of Orthodontics 76: 423-442
26. Pancherz H 1982a The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. American Journal of Orthodontics 82: 104-113
27. Pancherz H 1982b Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. Swedish Dental Journal 15 (Supplement): 189-196
28. Pancherz H, Fackel U 1990 The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post-dentofacial orthopaedics. A long-term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance. European Journal of Orthodontics 12: 209-218
29. Pancherz H, Hägg U 1985 Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. American Journal of Orthodontics 88: 273-287
30. Pancherz H, Hansen K 1986 Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation. European Journal of Orthodontics 8: 215-228
31. Pancherz H, Michailidou C 2004 Temporomandibular joint growth changes in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent Herbst subjects. A long-term roentgenographic cephalometric study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 126: 153-161; quiz 254-255
32. Phan K L D, Bendeus M, Hägg U, Hansen K, Rabie AB M 2006 Comparison of the headgear activator and Herbst appliance-effects and posttreatment changes. European Journal of Orthodontics 28: 594-604
33. Rabie A B, She T T, Hägg U 2003a Functional appliance therapy accelerates and enhances condylar growth. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 123: 40-48
34. Rabie A B, Tsai M J, Hägg U, Du X, Chou B W 2003b The correlation of replicating cells and osteogenesis in the condyle during stepwise advancement. The Angle Orthodontist 73: 457-465
35. Ruf S, Baltromejus S, Pancherz H 2001 Effective condylar growth and chin position changes in activator treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. The Angle Orthodontist 71: 4-11
36. Tulloch J F, Phillips C, Proffit W R 1998 Benefit of early Class II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 113: 62-72; quiz 73-74
37. van Beek H 1982 Overjet correction by a combined headgear and activator. European Journal of Orthodontics 4: 279-290
38. Wieslander L 1993 Long-term effect of treatment with the headgearHerbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Stability or relapse? American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 104: 319-329
39. Wong G W, So L L, Hägg U 1997 A comparative study of sagittal correction with the Herbst appliance in two different ethnic groups. European Journal of Orthodontics 19: 195-204