What does headgear add to Herbst treatment and to retention

Seminars in Orthodontics

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 57-66

  Hägg, Urban ^a,b   Du, Xi ^a,b   Rabie, A Bakr M ^a,b   Bendeus, Margareta ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b West China University   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; BONE GROWTH; CEPHALOMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALOCCLUSION; MAXILLA; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MORPHOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0037353922     PISSN: 10738746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/sodo.2003.34025     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Proffit, William R. Contemporary Orthodontics (ed 3). St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 1993.
2. Jakobsson SO. Cephalometric evaluation of treatment effect on Class II, division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1967;53:446-457.
3. Melsen B. Effects of cervical anchorage during and after treatment: an implant study. Am J Orthod 1978;73:526-540.
4. Ghafari J, Shofer FS, Jacobsson-Hunt U, et al. Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998;113:51-61.
5. Tulloch JFC, Philips C, Proffit WR. Benefit of early Class II treatment: Progress report of a two-phase randomised clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998;113: 62-72.
6. Wieslander L, Buck DL. Physiologic recovery after cervical traction therapy. Am J Orthod 1974;66:294-301.
7. Hansson C, Skold B, Linder-Aronson S. Treatment of adolescents with Hansaplate/headgear. Influence on face in profile and on dention. J Orofac Orthop 1997; 58:16-29.
8. Hasund A. The use of activators in a system employing fixed appliances. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1969;45:329-341.
9. Pfeiffer JP, Grobety D. Simultaneous use of cervical appliance and activator: An orthopedic approach to fixed appliance therapy. Am J Orthod 1972;61:353-373.
10. Teuscher U. A growth-related concept for skeletal Class II treatment. Am J Orthod 1978;74:258-275.
11. Van Beek H. Overjet correction by a combined headgear activator. Eur J Orthod 1982;4:279-290.
12. Bass NM. Dento-facial orthopaedics in the correction of Class II malocclusion. Br J Orthd 1982;9:3-31.
13. Levin RI. Activator headgear therapy. Am J Orthod 1985; 87:91-109.
14. Malmgren O, Ömblus J. Treatment with an orthopaedic appliance system. Eur J Orthod 1985;7:205-214.
15. Kigele E. Cephalometric changes from activator-headgear treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion. J Clin Orthod 1987;21:466-469.
16. Malmgren O, Ömblus J, Hägg U, et al. Treatment with an orthopaedic appliance system in relation to treatment intensity and growth periods. A study of initial effects. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1987;91:143-151.
17. Lehman R, Romuli A, Bakker V. Five-year treatment results with a headgear-activator combination. Eur J Orthod 1988;10:309-318.
18. Lagerström LO, Nielsen IL, Lee R, et al. Dental and skeletal contributions to occlusal correction in patients treated with the high-pull headgear-activator combination. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990;97:495-504.
19. Dermaut LR, van-den-Eynde F, de-Pauw G. Skeletal and dento-alveolar changes as a result of headgear activator therapy related to different vertical growth patterns. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:140-146.
20. Özturk Y, Tankuter N. Class II: A comparison of activator and activator headgear combination appliances. Eur J Orthod 1994;16:149-157.
21. Ömblus J, Malmgren O, Pancherz H, et al. Long-term effects of class correction in Berbst and Bass therapy. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:185-193.
22. Bendeus M, Hägg U, Rabie B. Growth, treatment changes and effects in patients treated with Headgear activator. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2002;121:376-384.
23. Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M. The headgear effect of the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric long-term study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993;103:510-520.
24. Wieslander L. Long-term effect of treatment with the headgear-Herbst appliance in the eaarly mixed dentition. Stability or relapse? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:319-329.
25. Hansen K, Pancherz H. Long-term effects of Herbst treatment in relation to normal growth development; a cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:285-295.
26. Schiavoni R, Grenga V, Macri V. Treatment of Class II high angle malocclusions with the Herbst appliance: A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992;102:393-409.
27. Du X, Hägg U, Rabie ABM. Effects of headgear Herbst and mandibular ste[-by-step advancement vs conventional Herbst appliance and maximal jumping of the mandible. Eur J Orthod 2002;24:167-174.
28. Leung D, Hägg U. Electromyographic investigation in adolescents being treated with progressive jumping of the mandible. Angle Orthod 2001;71:177-184.
29. Hägg U, Du X, Rabie ABM. Initial and late treatment effect of Headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2002;122:477-485.
30. Hägg U, Tse ELK, Rabie ABM. Splinted vs bonded Herbst appliance-Treatment changes and complications. Aust J Orthod 2002;18:76-81.
31. Ahlgren J. A longitudinal clinical and cephalometric study of 50 malocclusion cases treated with activator appliances. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1972;285-293.
32. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 1982;82:104-113.
33. Pancherz H. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Swed Dent J 1982:15(suppl):189-196.
34. Pancherz H, Malmgren O, Hägg U, et al. Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy. Eur J Orthod 1989; 11:17-30.
35. Wong G, SO L, Hägg U. A comparative study of the sagittal correction with the Herbst appliance in two different ethnic groups. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:195-204.
36. Ekstrom C. Facial growth rate and its relation to somatic maturation in healthy children. Swed Dent J 1982: 11(suppl):1-99.
37. Ömblus J, Malmgren O, Hägg U, et al. Mandibular growth during initial treatment with Bass orthopedic appliance in relation to age and growth periods. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:195-204.
38. McNamara JA Jr, Howe RP, Dischinger TG. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990;98:134-144.
39. Pancherz H, Hansen K. Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: A cephalometric investigation. Eur J Orthod 1986;8:215-228.
40. Pancherz H, Fackel U. The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post-dentofacial orthopaedics. A long-term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 1990;12:209-218.
41. Pancherz H, Zieber K, Hoyer B. Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusions: A comparative study in children. Angle Orthod 1997;67:111-120.
42. Zeng XL, Forsberg CM, Linder-Aronson S. Craniofacial morphology in Chinese and Swedish children with Angle Class I and Class II occlusal relations. Aust J Orthod 1998;15:168-176.
43. Lau JWP, Hägg U. Cephalometric morphology of Chinese with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Brit Dent J 1999;186:188-190.