Enrichment and stability: A phenomenological coupling of energy value and carrying capacity

BioSystems

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 371-378

  Roy, Shovonlal ^a   Chattopadhyay, J ^a  

^a INDIAN STATISTICAL INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Caloric content; Carrying capacity; Energy value; Paradox of enrichment; Stability

Indexed keywords

CARRYING CAPACITY; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; ENERGY; FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE; MODELING; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; THEORETICAL STUDY;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; ECOSYSTEM; EMPIRICISM; ENERGY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FOOD; PHENOMENOLOGY; PREDATOR PREY INTERACTION; STOICHIOMETRY; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 34548431044     PISSN: 03032647     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2006.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abrams P.A., and Roth J. The responses of unstable food chains to enrichment. Evol. Ecol. 8 (1994) 150-171
2. Andersen T. Pelagic Nutrient Cycles: Herbivores as Sources and Sinks (1997), Springer, New York, NY
3. Arditi R., and Ginzburg L.R. Coupling in predatorprey dynamics: ratio-dependence. J. Theor. Biol. 139 (1989) 311-326
4. Arino J., Pilyugin P.S., and Wolkowicz G.S.K. Considerations on yield, nutrient uptake, cellular growth, and competition in chemostat models. Can. Appl. Math. Quarterly 11 (2003) 107-142
5. Baalen M., Krivan V., van Rijn P.C.J., and Sabelis M. Alternative food, switching predators, and the persistence of predator-prey systems. Am. Nat. 157 (2001) 512-524
6. Breman H., and DeWit C.T. Rangeland productivity and exploitation in the Sahel. Science 221 (1983) 1341-1347
7. Crooke P., and Tanner R. Hopf bifurcations for variable yeild continuous fermentation model. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 20 3 (1982) 439-443
8. Coe M. Nitrogen as an Ecological Factor (1983), Blackwell, Oxford
9. Elser J.J., Marzolf E.R., and Goldman C.R. Phosphorus and nitrogen limitation of phytoplankton growth in the freshwaters of North America: A review and critique of experimental enrichments. Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci. 47 (1990) 1468-1477
10. Fussmann G.F., Ellner S.P., Shertzer K.W., and Hairston N.G. Crossing the Hopf bifurcation in a live predator-prey system. Science 290 (2000) 1358-1360
11. Fussmann G.F., and Blasius B. Community response to enrichment is highly sensitive to model structure. Biol. Lett. 1 (2005) 9-12
12. Genkai-Kato M., and Yamamura N. Unpalatable prey resolves the paradox of enrichment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266 (1999) 1215-1219
13. Gilpin M.E. Enriched predator-prey systems: theoretical stability. Science 177 (1972) 902-904
14. Ivlev V.S. Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fishes (1961), Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
15. Jassby A.D., and Platt T. Mathematical formulation of the relationship between photosynthesis and light for phytoplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21 (1976) 540-547
16. Jensen X.J., and Ginzburg L.R. Paradoxes or theoretical failures? The jury is still out. Ecol. Modell. 188 (2005) 314
17. Jones R.H., and Flynn K.J. Nutritional status and diet composition affect the value of diatoms as copepod prey. Science 307 (2005) 1457-1459
18. Kirk K.L. Enrichment can stabilize population dynamics: autotoxins and density dependence. Ecology 79 7 (1998) 2456-2462
19. Loladge I., Kuang Y., and Elser J. Stoichiometry in producer-grazer systems: linking energy flow with element recycling. Bull. Math. Biol. 62 (2000) 1137-1162
20. Luckinbill L.S. Coexistence in laboratory populations of Paramecium aurelia and its predator Didinium nasutum. Ecology 54 (1973) 1320-1327
21. McCauley E., and Murdoch W.W. Predator-prey dynamics in environments rich and poor in nutrients. Nature 343 (1990) 455-457
22. May R.M. Limit cycles in predator-prey communities. Science 177 (1972) 900-902
23. Milchunas D.G., Varnamkhasti A.S., Lauenroth W.K., and Goetz H. Forage quality in relation to long-term grazing history, current-year defoliation, and water resource. Oecologia 101 (1995) 366-374
24. Muller E.B., Nisbet R.M., Kooijman S.A.L.M., Elser J.J., and McCauley E. Stoichiometric food quality and herbivore dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 4 (2001) 519-529
25. Nelson W.A., McCauley E., and Wrona F.J. Multiple dynamics in a single predator-prey system: experimental effects of food quality. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268 (2001) 1223-1230
26. Olff H., Ritchie M., and Prins E. Global environmental controls of diversity in large herbivores. Nature 415 (2002) 901-904
27. Persson A., Hansson L.A., Brönmark C., Lundberg P., Pettersson L.B., Greenberg L., Nilsson P.A., Nyström P., Romare P., and Tranvik L. Effects of enrichment on simple aquatic food webs. Am. Nat. 157 (2001) 654-669
28. Rosenzweig M.L. Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitative ecosystem in ecological time. Science 171 (1971) 385-387
29. Rosenzweig M.L., and MacArthur R.H. Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator-prey interactions. Am. Nat. 97 (1963) 209-223
30. Roy S., Alam S., and Chattopadhyay J. Role of nutrient bound on the dynamics of predator-mediated competitive-coexistence. BioSystems 82 (2005) 143-153
31. Roy, S., Chattopadhyay, J. Enrichment and stability of ecosystems: a brief overview of the paradox. J. Biosciences., submitted for publication.
32. Sterner R.W., and Elser J.J. Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere (2002), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
33. Tilman D., and Olff H. An Experimental study of the effects of pH and nitrogen on grassland vegation. Acta Ecol. 12 3 (1991) 427-441
34. Urabe J., and Sterner R.W. Regulation of herbivore growth by the balance of light and nutrients. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93 (1996) 8465-8469