A structured approach for assessing the effectiveness of engineering design tools in new product development

EMJ - Engineering Management Journal

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 31-39

  Farris, Jennifer A ^a   Van Aken, Eileen M ^a   Letens, Geert ^b   Ellis, Kimberly P ^a   Boyland, John ^c  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ROYAL MILITARY ACADEMY   (Belgium)

^c Danaher Motion   (United States)

Author keywords

Engineer to order; Engineering design; Performance measurement; Product development

Indexed keywords

DESIGN AIDS; PRODUCT DESIGN; QUALITY CONTROL;

ENGINEERING DESIGN; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 34548429234     PISSN: 10429247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10429247.2007.11431729     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. rd Ed., AIAG (2001).
2. Barclay, I., “Organisational Factors for Success in New Product Development,” Science, Measurement, and Technology, IEE Proceedings, 149:2 (March 2002), pp. 105-112.
3. Ben-Daya, M., and Raouf, Abdul, “A Revised Failure Mode and Effects Analysis” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 13:1 (1996), pp. 43-47.
4. Bernasco, Wilma, de Weerd-Nederhof, Petra C., Tillema, Harry, and Boer, Harry, “Balanced Matrix Structure and New Product Development Process at Texas Instruments Materials and Controls Division,” R&D Management, 29:2 (1999), pp. 121-131.
5. Cooper, Robert G., Edgett, Scott J., Kleinschmidt, Elko J. “Benchmarking Best NPD Practices,” Research Technology Management, 47:1 (Nov-Dec 2003), pp. 31-43; (May-June 2004) pp. 50-59; (Nov-Dee 2004) pp. 43-45.
6. CMU/SEI-2002-TR-003, CMMI Version 1.1—Continuous Representation, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon (December 2001).
7. Dale, B., and Shaw, P. “Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in the UK Motor Industry: A State-of-the-Art Study,” Quality and Reliability Engineering Journal, 6 (1990), pp. 179-188.
8. Devadasan, S.R., Muthu, S., Samson, R. Neil, and Sankaran, R. A., “Design of Total Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Programme,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20:5 (2003), pp. 561-568.
9. DRM Technologies, FMEA Student Guide (DRM Technologies).
10. EIA-632, Processes for Engineering a System, Electronic Industries Alliance (Sept. 1, 2003).
11. EIA/IS 731.1, Systems Engineering Capability Model, Electronic Industries Alliance (Interim Standard) (Aug. 1, 2002).
12. Hampton AutoBeat LLC, “3P: Toyota’s Secret Weapon,” Autobeat Daily, (April 2, 2002), p. 14.
13. Ibrahim, Linda, “Integrating Beyond Capability Maturity Models,” Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Symposium of theINCOSE, (July 2002).
14. IEEE 1220-1998, IEEE Standard for Application and Management of the Systems Engineering Process, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, (May 1,1998).
15. ISO/IEC 15288: 2002, Systems Engineering—System Life Cycle Processes, International Organization for Standardization, (Jan. 11,2002).
16. James, Lawrence J., Robert G. Demaree, and Gerrit Wolf, “Estimating Within-Group Interrater Reliability with and Without Response Bias” Journal of Applied Psychology, 69:1 (1984), pp. 85-98.
17. James, Lawrence J., Demaree, Robert G., and Wolf, Gerrit, “rwg: An Assessment of Within-Group Interrater Agreement,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 78:2 (1993), pp. 306-309.
18. Melnyk, Steven A., Calantone, Roger J., Montabon, Frank L., and Smith, Richard T. “Short-Term Action in Pursuit of Long- Term Improvements: Introducing Kaizen Events,” Production and Inventory Management Journal, 39: 4 (Fourth Quarter 1998), pp. 69-76.
19. Rahim, Rahman Abdul, and Baksh, Sharrif Nabi, “The Need for a New Product Development Framework for Engineer-to- Order Products,” European Journal of Innovation Management, 6:3 (2003), pp. 182-196.
20. Waurzyniak, Patrick, “Lean Fighter,” Manufacturing Engineering, 134:3 (March 2005), pp. 79-90.