Can children with (central) auditory processing disorders ignore irrelevant sounds?

Research in Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 506-517

  Elliott, Emily M ^a   Bhagat, Shaum P ^b   Lynn, Sharon D ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Central auditory processing disorders; Development; Irrelevant sounds; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING DISORDER; HUMAN; MALE; RECALL; SCHOOL CHILD; SOUND; SPEECH; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; WORKING MEMORY;

ADOLESCENT; AUDITORY PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; CHILD; HUMANS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS;

EID: 34548415778     PISSN: 08914222     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2006.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Central auditory processing: current status of research and implications for clinical practice. American Journal of Audiology 5 (1996) 41-54
2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005). (Central) auditory processing disorders-The role of the audiologist. Available at: http://www.asha.org/members/deskref-journals/deskref/default.
3. Baddeley A.D. The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: Some comments on Neath. Psychological Bulletin and Review 7 (2000) 544-549
4. Bamiou D.E., Musiek F.E., and Luxon L.M. Aetiology and clinical presentations of auditory processing disorders-A review. Archives of Disease in Childhood 85 (2001) 361-365
5. Banbury S.P., Tremblay S., and Macken W.J. Auditory distraction and short-term memory: Phenomena and practical implications. Human Factors 43 (2001) 12-29
6. Bellis T.J. Assessment and management of central auditory processing disorders in the educational setting: From science to practice (2003), Delmar Learning, Clinton Park, New York
7. Bellis T.J., and Ferre J.M. Multidimensional approach to the differential diagnosis of central auditory processing disorders in children. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 10 (1999) 319-328
8. Cacace A.T., and McFarland D.J. Central auditory processing disorder in school-aged children: A critical review. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 41 (1998) 355-373
9. Cacace A.T., and McFarland D.J. The importance of modality specificity in diagnosing central auditory processing disorder. American Journal of Audiology 14 (2005) 112-123
10. Chermak G.D., Hall J.W., and Musiek F.E. Differential diagnosis and management of central auditory processing disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 10 (1999) 289-303
11. Chermak G.D., and Musiek F.E. Central auditory processing disorders: New perspectives (1997), Singular Publishing Group, San Diego
12. Cowan N., Nugent L.D., Elliott E.M., Ponomarev I., and Saults J.S. The role of attention in the development of short-term memory: Age differences in the verbal span of apprehension. Child Development 70 (1999) 1082-1097
13. Cowan N., Nugent L.D., Elliott E.M., and Saults J.S. Persistence of memory for ignored lists of digits: Areas of developmental constancy and change. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 76 (2000) 151-172
14. Elliott E.M. The irrelevant-speech effect and children: Theoretical implications of developmental change. Memory and Cognition 30 (2002) 478-487
15. Friel-Patti S. Clinical decision-making in the assessment and intervention of central auditory processing disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 30 (1999) 345-352
16. Gomez R., and Condon M. Central auditory processing ability in children with ADHD with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities 32 (1999) 150-158
17. Jerger J., and Musiek F. Report of the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 11 (2000) 467-474
18. Jones D.M. Objects, streams, and threads of auditory attention. In: Baddeley A., and Weiskrantz L. (Eds). Attention: Selection, awareness, and control (1993), Oxford University Press, Oxford 87-104
19. Jones D.M., and Macken W.J. Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19 (1993) 369-381
20. Lange E. Disruption of attention by irrelevant stimuli in serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language 53 (2005) 513-531
21. Macken W.J., Tremblay S., Alford D., and Jones D.M. Attentional selectivity in short-term memory: Similarity of process, not similarity of content, determines disruption. International Journal of Psychology 34 (1999) 322-337
22. McFarland D.J., and Cacace A.T. Modality specificity as a criterion for diagnosing central auditory processing disorders. American Journal of Audiology 4 (1995) 36-48
23. Meister H., von Wedel H., and Walger M. Psychometric evaluation of children with suspected auditory processing disorders (APDs) using a parent-answered survey. International Journal of Audiology 43 (2004) 431-437
24. Møller A.R. Sensory systems: Anatomy and physiology (2003), Academic Press, San Diego
25. Musiek F.E., Bellis T.J., and Chermak G.D. Nonmodularity of the central auditory nervous system: Implications for (central) auditory processing disorder. American Journal of Audiology 14 (2005) 128-138
26. Neath I. Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 7 (2000) 403-423
27. Saito S., and Baddeley A.D. Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: Exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 57A (2004) 1309-1340
28. Schneider W., Eschman A., and Zuccolotto A. E-Prime user's guide (2002), Psychology Software Tools Inc., Pittsburgh
29. Shield B., and Dockrell J.E. External and internal noise surveys of London primary schools. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 115 (2004) 730-738
30. Tremblay S., and Jones D.M. Change of intensity fails to produce an irrelevant sound effect: Implications for the representation of unattended sound. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 1005-1015