Hardy-Weinberg expectations in canine breeds: Implications for genetic studies

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 98, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 445-451

  Short, Andrea D ^a   Kennedy, Lorna J ^a   Barnes, Annette ^b   Fretwell, Neale ^c   Jones, Chris ^c   Thomson, Wendy ^d   Ollier, William E R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c WALTHAM CENTRE FOR PET NUTRITION   (United Kingdom)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; BREED; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DATA ANALYSIS; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; GENOTYPE; MARKER GENE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; CROSSES, GENETIC; DOGS; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MALE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SELECTION (GENETICS); SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 34548411734     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: 14657333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esm020     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Brouillette JA, Venta PJ. 2002. Within-breed heterozygosity of canine single nucleotide polymorphisms identified by across-breed comparison. Anim Genet. 33:464-467.
2. Catchpole B, Ristic JM, Fleeman LM, Davison LJ. 2005. Canine diabetes mellitus: can old dogs teach us new tricks? Diabetologia. 48:1948-1956.
3. Irion DN, Schaffer AL, Famula TR, Eggleston ML, Hughes SS, Pedersen NC. 2003. Analysis of genetic variation in 28 dog breed populations with 100 microsatellite markers. J Hered. 94:81-87.
4. Jones P. 2006. Comparison of 120 dog breeds form the US and UK by SNP genotyping identifies breed and geographic gene pool differences. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference: Advances in Canine and Feline Genomics, 2006 Aug 2-5; Universtiy of California, Davis.
5. Khanna C, Lindblad-Toh K, Vail D, London C, Bergman P, Barber L, Breen M, Kitchell B, McNeil E, Modiano JF, et al. 2006. The dog as a cancer model. Nat Biotechnol. 24:1065-1066.
6. Koskinen MT, Bredbacka P. 2000. Assessment of the population structure of five Finnish dog breeds with microsatellites. Anim Genet. 31:310-317.
7. Luikart G, Sherwin WB, Steele BM, Allendorf FW. 1998. Usefulness of molecular markers for detecting population bottlenecks via monitoring genetic change. Mol Ecol. 7:963-974.
8. Lupke L, Distl O. 2005. Microsatellite marker analysis of the genetic variability in Hanoverian Hounds. J Anim Breed Genet. 122:131-139.
9. Porrello A, Cardelli P, Spugnini EP. 2006. Oncology of companion animals as a model for humans. An overview of tumor histotypes. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 25:97-105.
10. Rijnberk A, Kooistra HS, Mol JA. 2003. Endocrine diseases in dogs and cats: similarities and differences with endocrine diseases in humans. Growth Horm IGF Res. 13(Suppl A):S158-S164.
11. Short AD. 2006. The genetics of canine diabetes: a candidate gene study [PhD Thesis]. [Manchester (UK)]: The University of Manchester.
12. Short AD, Catchpole B, Kennedy LJ, Barnes A, Fretwell N, Jones C, Thomson W, Ollier WER. 2007. Analysis of candidate susceptibility genes in canine diabetes. J Hered. Forthcoming.
13. Sutter NB, Ostrander EA. 2004. Dog star rising: the canine genetic system. Nat Rev Genet. 5:900-910.
14. Vandeput F, Perpete S, Coulonval K, Lamy F, Dumont JE. 2003. Role of the different mitogen-activated protein kinase subfamilies in the stimulation of dog and human thyroid epithelial cell proliferation by cyclic adenosine 5′-monophosphate and growth factors. Endocrinology. 44:1341-1349.