The impact of R&D spillovers on UK manufacturing TFP: A dynamic panel approach

Research Policy

Volumn 36, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 964-979

  Añón Higón, Dolores ^a  

^a ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Heterogeneous dynamic panel; R D spillovers; Total factor productivity (TFP)

Indexed keywords

HETEROGENEOUS DYNAMIC PANEL; TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY (TFP);

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; INVESTMENTS; PRODUCTIVITY;

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 34548398935     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aitken B., and Harrison A. Do domestic firms benefit from foreign direct investment? Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review 89 (1999) 605-618
2. Arellano M., and Bond S. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58 (1991) 277-298
3. Atella V., and Quintieri B. Do R&D expenditures really matter for TFP?. Applied Economics 33 (2001) 1385-1389
4. Basu S., and Fernald J.G. Returns-to-scale in U.S. production: estimates and implications. Journal of Political Economy 105 (1997) 249-283
5. Bernstein J.I., and Mohnen P. International R&D spillovers between U.S. and Japanese R&D intensive sectors. Journal of International Economics 44 2 (1998) 315-338
6. Branstetter L. Are knowledge spillovers international or intranational in scope? Microeconometric evidence from the United States and Japan. Journal of International Economics 53 (2001) 53-79
7. Cameron G. On the measurement of real R&D: Divisia price indices for UK business enterprise R&D. Research Evaluation 6 (1996) 215-219
8. Cameron, G., 1999. Innovation and Economic Growth in UK Manufacturing. Discussion Paper No. 38. Oxford Institute of Economics and Statistics.
9. Cameron G. Why did UK manufacturing productivity growth slow down in the 1970s and speed up in the 1980s?. Economica 70 (2003) 121-141
10. Cameron G., and Muellbauer J. Knowledge, increasing returns and the UK production function. In: Mayes D.G. (Ed). Sources of Productivity Growth (1996), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 120-140
11. Cameron G., Proudman J., and Redding S. Technological convergence, R&D, trade and productivity growth. European Economic Review 49 (2005) 775-807
12. Coe D.T., and Helpman E. International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review 39 (1995) 859-887
13. Cohen W., and Levinthal D. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal 99 (1989) 569-596
14. Geroski P.A. Innovation and the sectoral sources of UK productivity growth. The Economic Journal 101 (1991) 1438-1451
15. Griliches Z. R&D and the productivity slowdown. American Economic Review 70 (1980) 343-348
16. Griliches Z. The search for R&D spillovers. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94 (1992) 29-48
17. Griliches Z., and Lichtenberg F. R&D and productivity growth at the industry level: is there still a relationship. In: Griliches Z. (Ed). R&D, Patents, and Productivity (1984), Chicago University Press, Chicago 465-496
18. Griffith R., Redding S., and Van Reenen J. Mapping the two faces of R&D: productivity growth in a panel of oecd industries. The Review of Economics and Statistics 86 4 (2004) 883-895
19. Guellec D., and Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie B. From R&D to productivity growth: do the institutional settings and the source of funds of R&D matter. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 66 (2004) 353-378
20. Hall B.H., and Mairesse J. Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in French manufacturing firms. Journal of Econometrics 65 1 (1995) 263-293
21. Hausman J.A. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46 (1978) 1251-1272
22. Hubert F., and Pain N. Inward investment and technical progress in the UK manufacturing sector. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 48 (2001) 134-147
23. Im K.S., Pesaran M.H., and Shin Y. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 115 (2002) 53-74
24. Jones C.I., and Williams J.C. Measuring the social return to R&D. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (1998) 1119-1135
25. Kao C. Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics 90 (1999) 1-44
26. Kao C., Chiang M.H., and Chen B. International R&D spillovers: an application of estimation and inference in panel cointegration. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics: Symposium on Panel Data Unit Roots and Cointegration, vol. 61 (1999) 691-710
27. Keller W. Are international R&D spillovers trade-related? Analyzing spillovers among randomly matched trade partners. European Economic Review 42 (1998) 1469-1481
28. Lee K., Pesaran M.H., and Smith R. Growth and convergence in a multi-country empirical stochastic Solow model. Journal of Applied Econometrics 12 (1997) 357-392
29. Los B., and Verspagen B. R&D spillovers and productivity: evidence form US manufacturing microdata. Empirical Economics 25 (2000) 127-148
30. Luintel K.B., and Khan M. Are international R&D spillovers costly for the United States?. The Review of Economics and Statistics 86 4 (2004) 896-910
31. Miller R.E., and Blair P.D. Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions (1985), Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
32. McVicar D. Spillovers and foreign direct investment in UK manufacturing. Applied Economics Letters 9 (2002) 297-300
33. Mohnen P. R&D externalities and productivity growth. STI Review 18 (1996) 39-66
34. Nadiri, M.I., 1993. Innovations and Technological Spillovers. NBER Working Paper No. 4423. Cambridge, MA.
35. Nadiri, M.I., Kim, S., 1996. International R&D Spillovers, Trade and Productivity in Major OECD Countries. NBER Working Paper No. 5801. Cambridge, MA.
36. O'Mahony M. Britain's Relative Productivity Performance 1950-1996 (1999), NIESR, London
37. O'Mahony M., and Wagner K. Anglo German productivity performance: 1960-1989. In: Wagner K., and Van Ark B. (Eds). International Productivity Differences: Measurement and Explanation (1996), Elsevier, Amsterdam 143-194
38. Pedroni P. Panel cointegration; asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory 20 (2004) 597-625
39. Pedroni P. Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics: Symposium on Panel Data Unit Roots and Cointegration, vol. 61 (1999) 653-678
40. Pesaran M.H., and Shin Y. An autoregressive distribution lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. In: Strom S. (Ed). Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium (1999), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
41. Pesaran M.H., Shin Y., and Smith R. Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94 (1999) 621-634
42. Pesaran M.H., and Smith R. Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 68 (1995) 79-113
43. Romer P. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98 (1990) S71-S102
44. Schankerman M. The effects of double-counting and expensing on the measured return to R&D. The Review of Economic and Statistics 63 (1981) 454-458
45. Solow R.M. Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics 39 (1957) 312-320
46. Sterlacchini M. R&D, innovations and total factor productivity growth in British manufacturing. Applied Economics 21 (1989) 1549-1562
47. Terleckyj N.W. Effects of R&D on the Productivity Growth of Industries: An Exploratory Study (1974), National Planning Association, Washington, DC
48. Wakelin K. Productivity growth and R&D expenditure in UK manufacturing firms. Research Policy 30 (2001) 1079-1090