Inward investment and technical progress in the United Kingdom manufacturing sector

Scottish Journal of Political Economy

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 134-147

  Hubert, Florence ^a   Pain, Nigel ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE; INVESTMENT; MANUFACTURING; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0037689854     PISSN: 00369292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9485.00190     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. BARRELL, R. and PAIN, N. (1997). Foreign direct investment, technological change and economic growth within Europe. Economic Journal, 107, pp. 1770-86.
2. BARRELL, R. and PAIN, N. (1999). Trade restraints and Japanese direct investment flows. European Economic Review, 43, pp. 29-45.
3. BLOMSTROM, M. and KOKKO, A. (1998). Multinational corporations and spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12, pp. 247-78.
4. BLOMSTROM, M., KOKKO, A. and GLOBERMAN, S. (2000). The determinants of host country spillovers from foreign direct investment: a review and synthesis of the literature. In Pain (2000).
5. CARSON, C. S., GRIMM, B. T. and MOYLAN, C. E. (1994). A satellite account for research and development. Survey of Current Business, 74, 11, pp. 37-71.
6. COE, D. and HELPMAN, E. (1995). International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review, 39, pp. 859-87.
7. CRAFTS, N. and TONIOLO, G. (1996). Economic Growth in Europe Since 1945. Cambridge University Press.
8. DAVIES, S. W. and LYONS, B. R. (1991). Characterising relative performance: the productivity advantage of foreign owned firms in the UK. Oxford Economic Papers, 43, pp. 584-95.
9. DRIFFIELD, N. (1999). Indirect employment effects of foreign direct investment into the UK. Bulletin of Economic Research, 51, pp, 207-21.
10. DT1 (1998). Our Competitive Future: Building The Knowledge Driven Economy, The Competitiveness White Paper: Analysis and Background. Department of Trade and Industry, London.
11. DUNNING, J. H. (1988). US and Japanese manufacturing affiliates in the UK: comparisons and contrasts. In J. H. Dunning, Explaining International Production, Harper Collins.
12. ELTIS, W. (1996). How low profitability and weak innovativeness undermines UK industrial growth. Economic Journal, 106, pp. 184-95.
13. GRIFFITH, R. (1999). Using the ARD establishment level data to look at foreign ownership and productivity in the United Kingdom. Economic Journal, 109, pp. F416-42.
14. MANSFIELD, E. and ROMEO, A. (1980). Technology transfer to overseas subsidiaries by US based firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95, pp. 37-750.
15. NELSON, R. R. (1966). The CES production function and economic growth projections. Review of Economics and Statistics, XLVIII, pp. 326-28.
16. O'MAHONY, M. and WAGNER, K. (1994). Changing fortunes: an industry study of British and German productivity growth over three decades. NIESR Report Series No. 7.
17. PACEC (1995). Assessment of the Wider Effects of Foreign Direct Investment in Manufacturing in the UK. Report by PA Cambridge Economic Consultants for Department of Trade and Industry.
18. PAIN, N. (2000) (ed.), Inward Investment, Technological Change and Growth: The Impact of Multinational Corporations on the UK Economy. Palgrave Press.
19. PROUDMAN, J. and REDDING, S. (eds.) (1998). Openness And Growth. Bank of England.
20. RODRIK, D. (1997). TFPG controversies, institutions and economic performance in East Asia. NBER Working Paper No. 5914.
21. ROMER, P. (1993). Idea gaps and object gaps in economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32, pp. 543-73.