A comparative study of one-level and two-level semiparametric estimation of hemodynamic response function for fMRI data

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 26, Issue 21, 2007, Pages 3845-3861

  Zhang, C M ^a   Jiang, Y ^a   Yu, T ^a  

^a University of Wisconsin   (United States)

Author keywords

False discovery rate; Multiple comparison; Semiparametric test; Smoothing splines; Stimuli; Time resolution

Indexed keywords

ASSAY; BIOSTATISTICS; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN REGION; CONFERENCE PAPER; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAMETRIC TEST; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BRAIN; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, STATISTICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34548380079     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.2936     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Lange N. Tutorial in biostatistics: statistical approaches to human brain mapping by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Statistics in Medicine 1996; 15:389-428.
2. Lazar NA, Eddy WF, Genovese CR, Welling J. Statistical issues in fMRI for brain imaging. International Statistical Review 2001; 69:105-127.
3. Worsley KJ, Liao CH, Aston J, Petre V, Duncan GH, Morales F, Evans AC. A general statistical analysis for fMRI data. NeuroImage 2002; 15:1-15.
4. Worsley KJ, Friston KJ. Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited-again. NeuroImage 1995; 2:173-181.
5. Friston et al. SPM course notes, http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/ (1997).
6. Cox RW. AFNI: software for analysis, visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computers and Biomedical Research 1996; 29:162-173.
7. Smith S, Jenkinson M, Woolrich M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Johansen-Berg H, Bannister PR, De Luca M, Drobnjak I, Flitney DE, Niazy RK, Saunders J, Vickers J, Zhang Y, De Stefano N, Brady JM, Matthews PM. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage 2004; 23:208-219.
8. Woolrich MW, Ripley BD, Brady M, Smith SM. Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modelling of FMRI data. NeuroImage 2001; 14:1370-1386.
9. Ward BD. Deconvolution analysis of fMRI time series data. Technical Report, Biophysics Research Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, 2001.
10. Glover GH. Deconvolution of impulse response in event-related BOLD fMRI. NeuroImage 1999; 9:416-429.
11. Green PJ, Silverman BW. Nonparametric Regression and Generalized Linear Models: A Roughness Penalty Approach. Chapman & Hall: London, 1994.
12. Zhang CM. Calibrating the degrees of freedom for automatic data smoothing and effective curve checking. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2003; 98:609-628.
13. Anderson TW. Asymptotically efficient estimation of covariance matrices with linear structure. Annals of Statistics 1973; 1:135-141.
14. Diggle PJ, Verbyla AP. Nonparametric estimation of covariance structure in longitudinal data. Biometrics 1998; 54:401-415.
15. Boik R. Spectral models for covariance matrices. Biometrika 2002; 89:159-182.
16. Zhang CM, Lu Y, Johnstone T, Davidson R. Nonparametric modeling and inference for event-related FMRI data (preliminary report). Technical Report#1125, Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2006.
17. Adler RJ. The Geometry of Random Fields. Wiley: New York, 1981.
18. Worsley KJ, Marrett S, Neelin P, Vandal AC, Friston KJ, Evans AC. A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation. Human Brain Mapping 1996; 4:58-73.
19. Fan J, Zhang CM, Zhang J. Generalized likelihood ratio statistics and Wilks phenomenon. Annals of Statistics 2001; 29:153-193.
20. Purdon PL, Solo V, Weissko, RM, Brown E. Locally regularized spatiotemporal modeling and model comparison for functional MRI. NeuroImage 2001; 14:912-923.