Higher education policy as secondary school reform: Texas public high schools after Hopwood

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 200-217

  Domina, Thurston ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

College applications; Financial aid policy; Higher education outreach and admissions; K 16 school reform; Student engagement

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548352860     PISSN: 01623737     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0162373707304995     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
2. Amemiya, T. (1984). Tobit models: A survey. Journal of Econometrics, 24, 3-61.
3. Baker, M. L., Sigman, J. N., & Nugent, M. E. (2001). Truancy reduction: Keeping students in school. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
4. Betts, J. R., & McFarland, L. L. (1995). Safe port in a storm: The impact of labor market conditions on community college enrollments. Journal of Human Resources, 30(4), 741-765.
5. Callan, P. M., Finney, J. E., Kirst, M. W, Usdan, M. D., & Venezia, A. (2006). Claiming common ground: State policymaking for improving college readiness and success. Available at http://siher.stanford.edu/ documents/pdfs/Claim%20Comm%20Grnd%20Rpt %20FINAL%2003%2029%2006.pdf
6. Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2005). Would the elimination of affirmative action affect highly qualified minority applicants? Evidence from California and Texas. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 58(3), 416-434.
7. The College Board. (2005). The Advanced Placement report to the nation 2005. New York: Author.
8. CollegeForTexans.com. (2005). Towards Excellence, Access and Success (TEXAS) Grant program. Retrieved February 28, 2007, from http://www. collegefortexans.com/TEXASGrant/TEXASGrant.cfm
9. Dickson, L. M. (2006a). The changing accessibility, affordability, and quality of higher education in Texas. In R.G. Ehrenberg (Ed.), What's happening in college education? (pp. 229-250). Westport, CT: Praeger.
10. Dickson, L. M. (2006b). Does ending affirmative action in college admissions lower the percent of minority students applying to college? Economics of Education Review, 25, 109-119.
11. Dougherty, C., Mellor, L., & Jian, S. (2006). Orange juice or orange drink? Ensuring that "advanced courses " live up to their labels (NCEA Policy Brief No. 1). Retrieved October 12, 2006 from http://www.just4kids.org/en/files/PublicationOrange_Juice_or_ Orange_Drink_Ensuring_that_Advanced_Courses _Live_Up_to_Their_Labels-02-13-06. pdf
12. Finkel, S. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Haney, W. (2000). The myth of the Texas miracle in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(41). Retrieved October 12, 2006, from http:// cpaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41/
14. Heller, D. E. (Ed.). (2001). The states and public higher education policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15. Honoré, B. (1993). Orthogonality conditions for Tobit models with fixed effects and lagged dependent variables. Journal of Econometrics, 59(1-2), 35-61.
16. Hopwood v. University of Texas, 78 F. 3d 932 (1996).
17. Kirst, M. W., & Braceo, K. R. (2004). Bridging the great divide: How the K-12 postsecondary split hurts students, and what can be done about it. In M. W. Kirst & A. Venezia (Eds.), From high school to college: Improving opportunities for success in postsecondary education (pp. 1-30). San Francisco: John Wiley.
18. Kirst, M. W., & Venezia, A. (2001). Bridging the great divide between secondary schools and postsecondary education. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(1), 92-97.
19. Klopfenstein, K. (2004). The Advanced Placement expansion of the 1990s: How did traditionally underserved students fare? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 72(68). Retrieved May 15, 2007, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/ v12n68/
20. Leicht, K. T., & Sullivan, T. A. (2000). Minority student pipelines before and after challenges to affirmative action (Working paper, Texas Higher Education Opportunity Project). Retrieved October 12, 2006, from http://www.texastop 10.princeton.edu/reports/ misc/minority_pipelines.pdf
21. Long, M. C. (2004). College applications and the effect of affirmative action. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 319-342.
22. McDonough, P. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
23. Niu, S., Sullivan, T., & Tienda, M. (2006). Diversity by design or default? Minority students and the Texas top 10% law (Working paper, Texas Higher Education Opportunity Project). Retrieved October 12, 2006, from http://theop.princeton.edu/ reports/wp/Diversity%20by%20Design%200r %20Default.pdf
24. Niu, S., & Tienda, M. (2006). College choice set consideration and its implications on college choice modeling (Working paper, Texas Higher Education Opportunity Project).
25. Papke, L. E. (2001). The effects of spending on test pass rates: Evidence from Michigan. Retrieved October 12, 2006, from http://www.ippsr.msu.edu/ Publications/ARPapke.pdf
26. Robison, C. (2004, January 21). More student aid requests expected; changes urged for state grant program. The Houston Chronicle, p. A17.
27. Schmidt, P. (2006). Powerful forces draw academe into the fray: Economic fears and the high-school reform movement have colleges under pressure to help improve the education of children. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(21), B4.
28. State of Texas, Office of the Secretary of State, (n.d.) Texas administrative code, Tide 19, part 1, chapter 22, subchapter L: Toward Excellence, Access and Success (TEXAS) Grant Program. Available at http:// info.sos.state.tx.us/pls/pub/readtac$ext.ViewTAC?tac _view=5&ti= 19&pt=l&ch=22&sch=L&rl=Y
29. Tienda, M., Leicht, K. T., Sullivan, T., Maltese, M., & Lloyd, K. (2003). Closing the gap: Admissions and enrollments at the Texas public flagships before and after affirmative action (Working paper, Texas Higher Education Opportunity Project). Retrieved October 12, 2006 from http://theop.princeton.edu/reports/wp/ closing_the_gap.pdf
30. Tienda, M., & Niu, S. X. (2006a). Capitalizing on segregation, pretending neutrality: College admissions and the Texas top 10% law. American Law and Economics Review, 8(2), 312-346.
31. Tienda, M., & Niu, S. X. (2006b). Flagships, feeders, and the Texas top 10% law: A test of the "brain drain" hypothesis. Journal of Higher Education, 77(4), 712-739.
32. Walker, B., & Lavergne, G. (2001). Affirmative action and percent plans: What we learned in Texas. College Board Review, 193, 18-23.