Working memory for language is not special: Evidence for an articulatory loop for novel stimuli

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 470-473

  Wilson, Margaret ^a   Fox, Glenn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548312514     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194091     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. AVONS, S. E., WRIGHT, K. L., & PAMMER, K. (1994). The word-length effect in probed and serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 207-231.
2. BADDELEY, A. D. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. BADDELEY, A. D. (1995). Working memory. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 755-764). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. BADDELEY, A. D., & HITCH, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 647-667). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. BADDELEY, A. D., & HITCH, G. (1994). Developments in the concept of working memory. Neuropsychology, 8, 485-493.
6. COLLE, H. A., & WELSH, A. (1976). Acoustic masking in primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15, 17-31.
7. KRAKOW, R. A., & HANSON, V. L. (1985). Deaf signers and serial recall in the visual modality: Memory for signs, fingerspelling, and print. Memory & Cognition, 13, 265-272.
8. LOULA, F., PRASAD, S., HARBER, K., & SHIFFRAR, M. (2005). Recognizing people from their movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 210-220.
9. POIZNER, H., BELLUGI, U., & TWENEY, R. (1981). Processing of formational, semantic, and iconic information in American Sign Language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 1146-1159.
10. PRINZ, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154.
11. REISBERG, D., RAPPAPORT, I., & O'SHAUGHNESSY, M. (1984). Limits of working memory: The digit digit-span. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 203-221.
12. THORN, A. S. C., & GATHERCOLE, S. E. (2001). Language differences in verbal short-term memory do not exclusively originate in the process of subvocal rehearsal. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 357-364.
13. WILSON, M. (2001a). The case for sensorimotor coding in working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 44-57.
14. WILSON, M. (2001b). Perceiving imitatable stimuli: Consequences of isomorphism between input and output. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 543-553.
15. WILSON, M. (2006). Covert imitation: How the body schema acts as a prediction device. In G. Knoblich, I. M. Thornton, M. Grosjean, & M. Shiffrar (Eds.), Human body perception from the inside out (pp. 211-228). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. WILSON, M., & EMMOREY, K. (1997a). A visuospatial "phonological loop" in working memory: Evidence from American Sign Language. Memory & Cognition, 25, 313-320.
17. WILSON, M., & EMMOREY, K. (1997b). Working memory for sign language: A window into the architecture of the working memory system. Journal of Deaf Studies & Deaf Education: Special Issue on Memory & Cognition, 1, 121-130.
18. WILSON, M., & EMMOREY, K. (1998). A "word length effect" for sign language: Further evidence on the role of language in structuring working memory. Memory & Cognition, 26, 584-590.
19. WILSON, M., & EMMOREY, K. (2003). The effect of irrelevant visual input on working memory for sign language. Journal of Deaf Studies & Deaf Education, 8, 97-103.
20. WILSON, M., & KNOBLICH, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 460-473.