Mixture-model classification in DNA content analysis

Cytometry Part A

Volumn 71, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 716-723

  Wang, Huixia ^a   Huang, Shuguang ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ELI LILLY AND COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

DNA content; High content imaging; Likelihood ratio test; Mixing proportion; Mixture model

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DNA CONTENT; DNA DETERMINATION; KOLMOGOROV SMIRNOV TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CELL LINE; DNA; DNA REPLICATION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MITOSIS; NOCODAZOLE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 34548312216     PISSN: 15524922     EISSN: 15524930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20443     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Omerod MG. Analysis of DNA-general methods. In: Omerod MG, editor. Flow Cytometry, A Practical Approach, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1994. Chapter 7.
2. Gasparri F, Cappella P, Galvani A, Multiparametric cell cycle analysis by automated microscopy. J Biomol Screen 2006;11:586-598.
3. Mann RC, Hand RE Jr, Braslawsky GR. Parametric analysis of histograms measured in flow cytometry. Cytometry 1983;4:75-82.
4. Baldetorp B, Dalberg M, Holst U, Lindgren G. Statistical evaluation of cell kinetic data from DNA flow cytometry (FCM) by the EM algorithm. Cytometry 1989;10:695-705.
5. Vindelov LL, Christensen IJ. A review of techniques and results obtained in one laboratory by an integrated system of methods designed for routing clinical flow cytometric DNA analysis. Cytometry 1990;11:753-770.
6. Diaz-Frances E, Sprott DA. Statistical analysis of nuclear genome size of plants with flow cytometer data. Cytometry 2001;45:244-249.
7. Eudey TL. Statistical considerations in DNA flow cytometry. Stat Sci 1996;11:320-334.
8. Watson JV. Proof without prejudice revisited: Immunofluorescence histogram analysis using cumulative frequency subtraction plus ratio analysis of means. Cytometry 2001;43:55-68.
9. Bagwell CB. A journey through flow cytometric immunofluorescence analyses-finding accurate and robust algorithms that estimate positive fraction distribution. Clin Immunol Newsletter 1996;16:33-37.
10. Dempster A, Laird N, Rubin D. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc B, 1977;39:1-38.
11. McLachlan GJ, Basford KE. Mixture Models: Inference and Applications to Clustering. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1988. 119pp.
12. Gibbons JD. Nonparametric Methods for Quantitative Analysis, 3rd ed. Columbus, Ohio: American Sciences Press; 1997.
13. Conover WJ. Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 1999.
14. Young IT. Proof without prejudice: Use of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for the analysis of histograms from flow systems and other sources. J Histochem Cytochem 1977;25:935-941.
15. Lampariello F. On the use Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical test for immunofluorescence histogram comparison. Cytometry 2000;39:179-188.
16. Grove LE, Ghosh RN. Quantitative characterization of mitosis-blocked tetraploid cells using high content analysis. Assay Drug Dev Technol 2006;4:421-442.
17. Cellomics. Cellomics HCS Reader: Target Activation BioApplication Guide (V2 version). http://www.cellomics.com.