Environmental impacts of conventional and sustainable investment funds compared using input-output life-cycle assessment

Journal of Industrial Ecology

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 41-60

  Koellner, Thomas ^a,b,c   Suh, Sangwon ^d,e   Weber, Olaf ^c   Moser, Corinne ^f   Scholz, Roland W ^a,b  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b Department of Environmental Sciences ^*

^c GOE mbH

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^e LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^f Care Group AG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Ecological performance; Environmental investment; Equity funds; Impact assessment; Industrial ecology; Socially responsible investments (SRI)

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; INVESTMENTS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ECOLOGICAL PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTMENT; EQUITY FUNDS; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY; SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENTS (SRI);

LIFE CYCLE;

ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY;

EID: 34548308642     PISSN: 10881980     EISSN: 15309290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jiec.2007.1147     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aslaksen, I. and T. Synnestvedt. 2003. Ethical investment and the incentives for corporate environmental protection and social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 10(4): 212-223.
2. Barnea, A., R. Heinkel, and A. Kraus. 2005. Green investors and corporate investment. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 16(3): 332-346.
3. Bauer, R., K. Koedijk, and R. Otten. 2005. International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. Journal of Banking & Finance 29: 1751-1767.
4. Carnegie Mellon University - Green Design Initiative. 2003. Economic input-output life cycle assessment (EIO-LCA) model. 〈www.eiolca.net〉. Accessed 29 September 2003.
5. Cerin, P. and P. Dobers. 2001. What does the performance of the Dow Jones Sustainability Group tell us? Eco-Management and Auditing 8: 123-133.
6. Dietzenbacher, E. 1997. In vindication of the Ghosh model: A reinterpretation as a price model. Journal of Regional Science 37(3): 629-651.
7. Dillenburg, S., T. Greene, and H. Erekson. 2003. Approaching socially responsible investment with a comprehensive ratings scheme: Total social impact. Journal of Business Ethics 43: 167-177.
8. Eurosif. 2004. Eurosif transparency guidelines for the retail SRI fund sector. Paris: Eurosif.
9. Eurosif. 2007. SRI funds service. 〈www.eurosif.org〉. Accessed 19 March 2007.
10. Gallego, B. and M. Lenzen. 2005. A consistent input-output formulation of shared producer and consumer responsibility. Economic Systems Research 17(4): 365-391.
11. Ghosh, A. 1958. Input-output approach in an allocation system. Economica 25(97): 58-64.
12. Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS®). 2005. 〈www.msci.com/equity/gics.html〉. Accessed 10 March 2005.
13. Goedkoop, M. and R. Spriensma. 1999. The Eco-Indicator 99. A damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment. Methodology report. The Hague: Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting. 〈www.pre.nl/eco-indicator99/ei99- reports.htm〉 Accessed 13 April 2005.
14. Goedkoop, M., P. Hofstetter, R. Müller-Wenk, and R. Spriensma. 1998. The Eco-Indicator 98 explained. Internal Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 3(6): 352-360.
15. Hallerbach, W., H. Ning, A. Soppe, and J. Spronk. 2004. A framework for managing a portfolio of socially responsible investments. European Journal of Operational Research 153: 517-529.
16. Hawken, P. 2004. Socially responsible investing. How the SRI industry has failed to respond to people who want to invest with conscience and what can be done to change it. Sausalito,CA: NaturalCapital Institute.
17. Heinkel, R., A. Kraus, and J. Zechner. 2001. The effect of green investment on corporate behavior. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 36(4): 431-449.
18. Hendrickson, C. T., A. Horvath, S. Joshi, and L. B. Lave. 1998. Economic input-output models for environmental life cycle assessment. Environmental Science and Technology 32: 184A-191A.
19. Hofstetter, P. 1998. Perspectives in life cycle impact assessment: Astructured approach to combine models of the technosphere, ecosphere and valuesphere. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 1997. International Standard ISO 14040. Environmental Management. Life Cycle Assessment. Principles and Framework. ISO 14040:1997. Geneva: ISO.
21. Jayne, M. R. and G. Skerratt. 2003. Socially responsible investment in the UK - Criteria that are used to evaluate suitability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 10(1): 1-11.
22. Joshi, S. 1999. Product environmental life-cycle assessment using input-output techniques. Journal of Industrial Ecology 3(2-3): 95-120.
23. Kasemir, B., A. Süess, and A. J. B. Zehnder. 2001. The next unseen revolution. Pension fund investment and sustainability. Environment 43(9): 8-19.
24. Koehler, D. A., D. H. Bennett, G. A. Norris, and J. D. Spengler. 2005. Rethinking environmental performance from a public health perspective: A comparative industry analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 9(3): 143-167.
25. Koellner, T., O. Weber, M. Fenchel, and R. Scholz. 2005. Principles for sustainability rating of investment funds. Business Strategy and the Environment 14(1): 54-70.
26. Lenzen, M. 2001. Errors in conventional and input-output-based life-cycle inventories. Journal of Industrial Ecology 4(4): 127-148.
27. Modigliani, F. and L. Modigliani. 1997. Risk-adjusted performance. Journal of Portfolio Management 23(2): 45-54.
28. Monks, R., A. Miller, and J. Cook. 2004. Shareholder activism on environmental issues: A study of proposals at largeUScorporations (2000-2003). Natural Resources Forum 28(4): 317-330.
29. O'Rourke, A. 2003. The message and methods of ethical investment. Journal of Cleaner Production 11(6): 683-693.
30. Pennington, D. W., J. Potting, G. Finnveden, E. Lindeijer, O. Jolliet, T. Rydberg, and G. Rebitzer. 2004. Life cycle assessment part 2: Current impact assessment practice. Environment International 30(5): 721-739.
31. Plantinga, A. and B. Scholtens. 2001. Socially responsible investing and management style of mutual funds in the Euronext stock markets. Groningen, The Netherlands: Department of Finance, University of Groningen. 〈http://som.rug.nl〉. Accessed 10 May 2005.
32. Schröder, M. 2003. Socially responsible investments in Germany, Switzerland and the United States. An analysis of investment funds and indices. Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH (ZEW) [Center for European Economic Research] Discussion Paper 03-10. Mannheim, Germany: ZEW.
33. Statman, M. 2000. Socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal 53(3): 30-39.
34. Suh, S. 2004a. CEDA 3.0User's guide. A comprehensive environmental data archive for economic and environmental systems analysis. Leiden, The Netherlands: CML, Leiden University.
35. Suh, S. 2004b. Functions, commodities and environmental impacts in an ecological economic model. Ecological Economics 48(4): 451-467.
36. Suh, S. 2005a. Developing a sectoral environmental database for input-output analysis: The Comprehensive Environmental Data Archive of the US. Economic Systems Research 17(4): 449-469.
37. Suh, S. 2005b. Theory of materials and energy flow analysis in ecology and economics. Ecological Modelling 189(3-4): 251-269.
38. Suh, S. and G. Huppes. 2002. Missing inventory estimation tool using extended input-output analyses. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 7: 1-7.