Multiobjective heuristic approaches to seismic design of steel frames with standard sections

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 36, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1481-1495

  Ohsaki, M ^a   Kinoshita, T ^a   Pan, P ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Multiobjective programming; Plastic dissipated energy; Seismic design; Simulated annealing; Steel frame; Tabu search

Indexed keywords

HEURISTIC METHODS; SIMULATED ANNEALING; STEEL STRUCTURES; STRUCTURAL FRAMES; TABU SEARCH;

MULTIOBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING; PLASTIC DISSIPATED ENERGY; STEEL FRAME;

SEISMIC DESIGN;

GROUND MOTION; MULTIOBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING; OPTIMIZATION; SEISMIC DESIGN; SIMULATED ANNEALING; STEEL STRUCTURE;

EID: 34548289277     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.690     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Whittaker A, Constantinou M, Tsopelas P. Displacement estimates for performance-based seismic design. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1998; 124(8):905-912.
2. Xue Q, Chen CC. Performance-based seismic design of structures: a direct displacement-based approach. Engineering Structures 2003; 25:1803-1813.
3. Hasan R, Xu L, Grierson DE. Push-over analysis for performance-based seismic design. Composite Structures 2002; 80:2483-2493.
4. Balling RJ, Pister KS, Ciampi V. Optimal seismic-resistant design of a planar steel frame. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1983; 11:541-556.
5. Mahin S, Malley J, Hamburger R. Overview of the FEMA/SAC program for reduction of earthquake hazards in steel moment frame structures. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2002; 58:511-528.
6. Leelataviwat S, Goel SC, Stojadinović B. Energy-based seismic design of structures using yield mechanism and target drift. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2002; 128(8): 1046-1054.
7. Zou X-K, Chan C-M. An optimal resizing technique for seismic drift design of concrete buildings subjected to response spectrum and time history loadings. Composite Structures 2005; 83:1689-1704.
8. Burns S (ed.). Recent Advancements in Optimal Structural Design. ASCE: New York, 2002.
9. Haftka RT, Gürdal Z, Kamat MP. Elements of Structural Optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 1990.
10. Huang M-W, Arora JS. Optimal design of steel structures using standard sections. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 1997; 14:24-35.
11. Reeves C. Modern Heuristic Techniques for Combinatorial Problems. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1995.
12. Goldberg DE. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1989.
13. Aarts E, Korst J. Simulated Annealing and Boltzmann Machines: A Stochastic Approach to Combinatorial Optimization and Neural Computing. Wiley: Chichester, England, 1989.
14. Glover F. Tabu search - part I. ORSA Journal on Computing 1989; 1:190-206.
15. Liu M, Burns SA, Wen YK. Multiobjective optimization for performance-based seismic design of steel moment frame structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 34(3):289-306.
16. Marler T, Arora JS. Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 2004; 26(6):369-395.
17. Hamburger RO, Foutch DA, Cornell CA. Performance basis of guidelines for evaluation, upgrade and design of moment-resisting steel frames. Proceedings of the 12th World Congress of Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, Paper No. 2543, 2000.
18. Cohon JL. Multiobjective Programming and Planning. Mathematics in Science and Engineering, vol. 140. Academic Press: New York, 1978.
19. Whidborne JF, Gu DW, Postlethwaite I. Simulated annealing for multiobjective control system design. IEE Proceedings - Control Theory and Applications 1997; 144(6):582-588.
20. Jilla CD, Miller DW. Assessing the performance of a heuristic simulated annealing algorithm for the design of distributed satellite systems. Acta Astronautica 2001; 48(5):529-543.
21. Goldberg DE, Richardson J. Genetic algorithms with sharing for multimodal function optimization. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, Cambridge, MA, 1987.
22. Hansen MP. Tabu search for multiobjective optimization: Mots. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on MCDM, Cape Town, 1997; 6-10.
23. Baykasoglu A, Owen S, Gindy N. A taboo search based approach to find the Pareto optimal set in multiple objective optimization. Engineering Optimization 1999; 31:731-748.
24. Ogawa K, Tada M. Computer program for static and dynamic analysis of steel frames considering the deformation of joint panel. Proceedings of the 17th Symposium on Computer Technology of Information, Systems and Applications, Tokyo, 1994; 79-84 (in Japanese).