Performance-based seismic design of structures: A direct displacement-based approach

Engineering Structures

Volumn 25, Issue 14, 2003, Pages 1803-1813

  Xue, Qiang ^a   Chen, Cheng Chung ^a  

^a SINOTECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INC   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Displacement based approach; Performance based seismic design; Quantified performance criteria

Indexed keywords

ELASTICITY; FLEXIBLE STRUCTURES; SEISMOLOGY;

STRUCTURAL DISPLACEMENT;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; SEISMIC DESIGN; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 0242658760     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Tsai YC, Hsiang WB, Tsai KC, Chang KC. Regulations and provisions, commentary and examples of seismic design for buildings. Structural Engineering Association, ROC. 7/1994 (in Chinese).
2. Moehle JP. Displacement-based seismic design criteria. Earthquake Engineering Research at Berkeley, Report No. UCB/EERC-96/01. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, UC Berkeley, 1996:139-46.
3. Xue Q. Need of performance-based earthquake engineering in Taiwan: a lesson from the Chichi earthquake Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 29 2000 1609-1627
4. Kowalsky MJ, Priestley MJN, MacRae GA. Displacement-based design, a methodology for seismic design applied to single degree of freedom reinforced concrete structures. Report No. SSRP-94/16. Structural Systems Research, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, 1994.
5. Priestley M.J.N. Kowalsky M.J. Direct displacement-based seismic design of concrete buildings Bulletin of The New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 33 4 2000 421-444
6. Court AB, Kowalsky MJ. Performance-based engineering of buildings - a displacement design approach. In: Structural Engineering World Wide, Paper No. T109-1. SEAOC, 1998.
7. Fajfar P. Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 28 1999 979-993
8. SEAOC. Vision 2000, Conceptual framework for performance based seismic engineering of buildings. Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, CA, USA, 1995.
9. ATC. ATC-40, Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, vol. 1. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, USA, 1996.
10. FEMA. FEMA 273, Second Ballot Version, NEHRP Guidelines for Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA, 1997.
11. SEAOC. Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary (SEAOC Blue Book). Structural Engineers Association of California-Seismology Committee, CA, USA, 1999.
12. Xue Q. A direct displacement-based seismic design procedure of inelastic structures Engineering Structures 23 1 2001 1453-1460
13. Newmark N.M. Hall W.J. Earthquake spectra and design 1982 Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Berkeley
14. Riddell R. Garcia J.E. Garces E. Inelastic deformation response of SDOF systems subjected to earthquakes Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 31 3 2002 515-538
15. Chopra A.K. Chintanapakdee C. Comparing response of SDF systems to near-fault and far-fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 30 2001 1769-1789
16. Bertero VV. Performance-based seismic engineering: a critical review of proposed guidelines. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes. Bled/Slovenia, 1997:1-31.
17. Priestley MJN, Kowalsky MJ, Ranzo G, Benzoni G. Preliminary development of direct displacement-based design for multi-degree of freedom systems. In: Proceedings 65th Annual Convention, SEAOC, Maui, Hawaii, 1996.
18. Tsai KC, Li JW, Chou CC, Wang TS, Chung PC. DRAIN2D+, A General Purpose Computer Program for Static and Dynamic Analysis of Inelastic 2D Structures Supplemented with a Graphic Processor. Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, 1994.
19. Cosenza E, Manfredi G. The improvement of the seismic-resistant design for existing and new structures using damage concept. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes. Bled/Slovenia, 1997:119-130.
20. Fajfar P. Equivalent ductility factors taking into account low-cycle fatigue Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 21 1992 837-848
21. Priestley M.J.N. Seible F. Calvi G.M. Seismic design and retrofit of bridges 1996 John Wiley and Sons, Inc New York
22. Moehle J.P. Displacement-based design of RC structures subjected to earthquakes Earthquake Spectra 8 1992 403-428
23. Gupta A. Krawinkler H. Estimation of seismic drift demands for frame structures Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 29 2000 1287-1305
24. Aschheim M. Black E.F. Yield point spectra for seismic design and rehabilitation Earthquake Spectrum 16 2 2000 317-335
25. Browning J. Proportioning of earthquake-resistant rc building structures Journal of Structural Engineering 127 2 2001 145-151
26. Lee H.S. Revised rule for concept of strong-column weak-girder design Journal of Structural Engineering 122 4 1996 359-364