Population genetic effects of urban habitat fragmentation in the perennial herb Viola pubescens (Violaceae) using ISSR markers

Annals of Botany

Volumn 100, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 91-100

  Culley, Theresa M ^a   Sbita, Sarah J ^a   Wick, Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

Habitat fragmentation; ISSR; Population genetic structure; Urban effects; Viola pubescens

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENETIC VARIATION; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HERB; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; PERENNIAL PLANT; POLLINATION; POPULATION GENETICS;

CINCINNATI; NORTH AMERICA; OHIO; UNITED STATES;

HEXAPODA; VIOLA PUBESCENS; VIOLACEAE;

ARTICLE; ECOSYSTEM; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; VARIABLE NUMBER OF TANDEM REPEAT; VIOLACEAE;

ECOSYSTEM; GENETIC MARKERS; MINISATELLITE REPEATS; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; POPULATION DYNAMICS; VIOLA;

EID: 34548281125     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcm077     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aldrich PR, Hamrick JL. 1998. Reproductive dominance of pasture trees in a fragmented tropical forest mosaic. Science 281: 103-105.
2. Ballard HE. 1994. Violets of Michigan. Michigan Botanist 33: 131-199.
3. Berg G, Nordal I, Hestmark G. 1998. The effect of breeding systems and pollination vectors on the genetic variation of small plant populations within an agricultural landscape. Oikos 81: 17-29.
4. Bhattacharya M, Primack RB, Gerwein J. 2003. Are roads and railroads barriers to bumblebee movement in a temperate suburban conservation area? Biological Conservation 109: 37-45.
5. Braun EL. 1950. Deciduous forests of eastern North America. Philadelphia: The Blakiston Company.
6. Buchmann SL, Nabhan GP. 1996. The forgotten pollinators. Washington, DC: Island Press.
7. Cain SA. 1967. Studies on the stemmed yellow violets of eastern North America. II. Mass-collections of Viola pubescens and V. eriocarpa in the Michigan area. Naturaliste Canadien 94: 79-129.
8. Chapman RE, Wang J, Bourke AFG. 2003. Genetic analysis of spatial foraging patterns and resource sharing in bumble bee pollinators. Molecular Ecology 12: 2801-2808.
9. Crawford DJ, Esselman EJ, Windus JL, Pabin CS. 1998. Genetic variation in running buffalo clover (Trifolium stoloniferum: Fabaceae) using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers (RAPDs). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 81-89.
10. Cruzan MB. 2001. Population size and fragmentation thresholds for the maintenance of genetic diversity in the herbaceous endemic Scutellaria montana (Lamiaceae). Evolution 55: 1569-1580.
11. Culley TM. 2002. Reproductive biology and delayed selfing in Viola pubescens (Violaceae), an understory herb with chasmogamous and cleistogamous flowers. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163: 113-122.
12. Culley TM, Grubb TC. 2003. Genetic effects of habitat fragmentation in Viola pubescens (Violaceae), a perennial herb with chasmogamous and cleistogamous flowers. Molecular Ecology 12: 2919-2930.
13. Culley TM, Klooster MR. 2007. The cleistogamous breeding system: a review of its frequency, evolution and ecology in angiosperms. Botanical Review in press.
14. Culley TM, Wolfe AD. 2001. Population genetic structure of the cleistogamous plant species Viola pubescens, as indicated by isozyme and ISSR molecular markers. Heredity 86: 545-556.
15. Desender K, Small E, Gaublomme E, Verdyck P. 2005. Rural-urban gradients and the population genetic structure of woodland ground beetles. Conservation Genetics 6: 51-62.
16. Didham RK, Ghazoul J, Stork NE, Davis AJ. 1996. Insects in fragmented forests: a functional approach. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 255-260.
17. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemistry Bulletin 19: 11-15.
18. Ellstrand NC, Elam DR. 1993. Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 217-242.
19. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479-491.
20. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. 2005. Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 1: 47-50.
21. Fisher RA. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. London: Oxford University Press.
22. Foré SA, Hickey RJ, Vankat JL, Guttman SI, Schaefer RL. 1992. Genetic structure after forest fragmentation: a landscape ecology perspective on Acer saccharum. Canadian Journal of Botany 70: 1659-1668.
23. Gordon RM. 1969. The natural vegetation of Ohio in pioneer days. Bulletin of the Ohio Biological Survey 3: 1-109.
24. Griffith DM, DiGiovanni D, Witzel TL, Wharton EH. 1993. Forest statistics for Ohio, 1991. Resource Bulletin NE-128. Radnor, PA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, and Northeastern Forest Experiment Station,
25. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW. 1996. Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 351: 1291-1298.
26. Hitchings SP, Beebee TJC. 1998. Loss of genetic diversity and fitness in Common Toad (Bufo bufo) populations isolated by inimical habitat. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 11: 269-283.
27. Jennersten O. 1988. Pollination in Dianthus deltoides (Caryophyllaceae): effects of habitat fragmentation on visitation and seed set. Conservation Biology 2: 359-366.
28. Kearns CA, Inouye DW, Waser NM. 1998. Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 83-112.
29. Kronforst MR, Fleming TH. 2001. Lack of genetic differentiation among widely spaced subpopulations of a butterfly with home range behavior. Heredity 86: 243-250.
30. Kwak MM, Velterop O, van Andel J. 1998. Pollen and gene flow in fragmented habitats. Applied Vegetation Science 1: 37-54.
31. Ledig FT. 1992. Human impacts on genetic diversity in forest ecosystems. Oikos 63: 87-108.
32. Levesque FL, Dansereau P. 1996. Études sur les violettes jaunes caulescentes de l'est de l'amérique du nord. I. Taxonomie, nomenclature, synonymie et bibliographie. Naturaliste Canadien 93: 489-569.
33. McIntyre NE, Hostetler ME. 2001. Effects of urban land use on pollinator (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) communities in a desert metropolis. Basic and Applied Ecology 2: 209-218.
34. Miller MP. 1997. Tools for population genetic analyses (TFPGA) 1.3: a Windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular population genetic data. Computer software distributed by the author.
35. Mills LS, Tallmon DA. 1999. The role of genetics in understanding forest fragmentation. In: Rochelle JA, Lehmann LA, Wisniewski J eds. Forest fragmentation: wildlife and management implications. Boston: Brill, 171-186.
36. Nei M, Li W-H. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 76: 5269-5273.
37. Prober SM, Spindler LH, Brown AHD. 1998. Conservation of the grassy white box woodlands: effects of remnant population size on genetic diversity in the allotetraploid herb Microseris lanceolata. Conservation Biology 12: 1279-1290.
38. Rathcke BJ, Jules ES. 1993. Habitat fragmentation and plant-pollinator interactions. Current Science 65: 273-277.
39. Rohlf FJ. 1998. NTSYSpc: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2.02 h. Setauket, New York: Exeter Software.
40. Solbrig OT, Newell SJ, Kincaid DT. 1980. The population biology of the genus Viola. I. The demography of Viola sororia. Journal of Ecology 68: 521-546.
41. Spira TP. 2001. Plant-pollinator interactions: a threatened mutualism with implications for the ecology and management of rare plants. Natural Areas Journal 21: 78-88.
42. Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T. 1999. Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set. Oecologica 121: 432-440.
43. Tommasi D, Miro A, Higo HA, Winston ML. 2004. Bee diversity and abundance in an urban setting. Canadian Entomology 136: 851-869.
44. US Bureau of the Census. 2003. Population in metropolitan and metropolitan statistical areas ranked by 2000 population for the United States and Puerto Rico: 1990 and 2000. Available online at: http://www.census.gov/ population/www/cen2000/phc-t29.html.
45. Weir BS, Cockerham CC. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370.
46. White GM, Boshier DH, Powell W. 2002. Increased pollen flow counteracts fragmentation in a tropical dry forest: an example from Swietenia humilis Zuccarini. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99: 2038-2042.
47. Wolfe AD, Liston A. 1998. Contributions of PCR-based methods to plant systematics and evolutionary biology. In: Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Doyle JJ. eds. Plant molecular systematics II. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 43-86.
48. Young AG, Merriam HG. 1994. Effects of forest fragmentation on the spatial genetic structure of Acer saccharum Marsh. (sugar maple) populations. Heredity 72: 201-208.
49. Young AG, Merriam HG, Warwick SI. 1993. The effects of forest fragmentation on genetic variation in Acer saccharum Marsh. (sugar maple) populations. Heredity 71: 277-289.
50. Young A, Boyle T, Brown T. 1996. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 413-418.
51. Young AG, Brown AHD, Zich FA. 1999. Genetic structure of fragmented populations of the endangered daisy Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides. Conservation Biology 13: 256-265.