MRI scanners and the stapes prosthesis

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 733-738

  Fritsch, Michael H ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Magnetic; MRI scan; Otosclerosis; Prosthesis; Stapes

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIZZINESS; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; PROSTHESIS; THERMOGENESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CADAVER; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DATA COLLECTION; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; METALS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STAPES;

EID: 34548271056     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318125652a     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI). Steel Glossary. Available at: http://www.steel.org/Content/NavigationMenu/LearningCenter/SteelGlossary/ Steel_Glossary.htm. Accessed December 09, 2006.
2. Food and Drug Administration. Safe Medical Devices Act (SMDA). Section on: orthopedic, prosthetic, and surgical appliances and supplies. Rockville, MD: National Press Office; 1990. SIC 3842.
3. Shellock FG, Sawyer-Glover AM. The magnetic resonance environment and implants, devices, and materials. In: Shellock FG, ed. Magnetic Resonance Procedures: Health Effects and Safety. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2001:310-1.
4. Appelbaum EL, Valvassori GE. Further studies on the effects of magnetic resonance imaging fields on middle ear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990;99:801-4.
5. Appelbaum EL, Valvassori GE. Effects of magnetic resonance imaging fields on stapedectomy prostheses. Arch Otolaryngol 1985;111:820-1.
6. Syms MJ, Peterman GW. Magnetic resonance imaging of stapes prostheses. Am J Otol 2000;21:494-8.
7. Kwok P, Waldeck A, Strutz J. Wie verhalten sich metallhaltige Mittelohrimplante in der Kernspin tomography? Laryngorhinootologie 2003;82:13-8.
8. Fritsch MH, Gutt JJ. Ferromagnetic movements of middle ear implants and stapes prostheses in a 3-T magnetic resonance field. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:225-30.
9. Fritsch MH, Gutt JJ, Naumann IC. Magnetic properties of middle ear and stapes implants in a 9.4 Tesla magnetic resonance field. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:1064-9.
10. Williams MD, Antonelli PJ, Williams LS, et al. Middle ear prosthesis displacement in high-strength magnetic fields. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:158-61.
11. Matucci KF, Setzen M, Hyman R, Chaturvedi G. The effect of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging on metallic middle ear prostheses. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;94:441-3.
12. Martin AD, Driscoll CLW, Wood CP, Felmlee JP. Safety evaluation of titanium middle ear prostheses at 3.0 tesla. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;132:537-42.
13. Syms MJ, Peterman GW. Vibratory sample magnetometry of middle ear prostheses and manufacturing materials. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:487-91.
14. Davis PL, Crooks L, Arakawa M, et al. Potential hazards in NMR imaging: heating effects of changing magnetic fields and RF fields on small metallic implants. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981;137:857-60.
15. Drescher R, Kahle M, Koesfer O, Titschert A. Heating of non-ferromagnetic total hip endoprostheses during magnetic resonance imaging in an animal model. Orthopedics 2006;29:153-5.
16. Chou CK, McDougall JA, Chan KW. Absence of radiofrequency heating from auditory implants during magnetic resonance imaging. Bioelectromagnetics 1995;16:307-16.
17. Kainz W, Neubauer G, Uberbacher R, et al. Temperature measurement on neurological pulse generators during MR scans. Laryngorhinootologie 2003;82:13-8.
18. Shellock FG, Morisoli SM. Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts produced by heart valve prostheses exposed to a 1.5-T MR system. J Magn Res Imaging 1994;4:756-8.
19. Syms MJ. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging of stapes prostheses. Laryngoscope 2005;115:381-90.
20. FDA Online Database. Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH). Medical Device Reporting database (MDR), and Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database (MAUDE). Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/maude. html. Accessed January 06, 2007.
21. Lippy WH, Burkey JM, Schuring AG, et al. Comparison of titanium and Robinson stainless steel stapes pistons prostheses. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:874-7.