Magnetic resonance imaging of stapes prostheses

American Journal of Otology

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 494-498

  Syms, Mark J ^a   Petermann, Gregory W ^b  

^a HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b TRIPLER ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Ferromagnetic; Magnetic resonance imaging; Stapes prosthesis

Indexed keywords

FERROMAGNETIC MATERIAL;

ARTICLE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; STAPES;

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETICS; MATERIALS TESTING; OSSICULAR PROSTHESIS; PRODUCT LABELING; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE;

EID: 0033916620     PISSN: 01929763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Applebaum EL, Valvassori GE. Effects of magnetic resonance imaging fields on stapedectomy prostheses. Arch Orolaryngol 1985;! 11:820-1.
2. Mattucci KF, Setzen M, Hyman R, Chaturvedi G. The effect of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging on metallic middle ear prostheses. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;94:441-3.
3. Leon JA, Gabriele OF. Middle ear prosthesis: significance of magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1987;5: 405-6.
4. Shellock FG, Schatz CJ. Metallic otologic implants: in vitro assessment of ferromagnetism at 1.5 T. AJNR 1991; 12:279-81.
5. Applebaum EL, Valvassori GE. Further studies on the effects of magnetic imaging on middle ear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990;99:801-4.
6. Klucznik RP, Carrier DA, Pyka R, Haid RW. Placement of a ferromagnetic intracerebral aneurysm clip in a magnetic field with a fatal outcome. Radiology 1993;187:855-6.
7. Kanal E, Shellock FG, Lewin JS. Aneurysm clip testing for ferromagnetic properties: clip variability issues. Radiology 1996;200: 576-8.
8. Package insert from Xomed Surgical Products, Inc., stapes prostheses.
9. A primer on medical dévide interactions with magnetic resonance imaging systems: draft document, www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/ primer6.html
10. White DW. Interactions between magnetic fields and metallic ossicular prostheses. Am J Otol 1987:8:90-2.
11. Garaventa G, Satrango L, Vellucci F, Pagano M, Pallestrini EA. The interactions between metal stapes prostheses and high-intensity magnetic fields during magnetic resonance tomography. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 1991;11:455-63.
12. New PF, Rosen BR, Brady TJ, et al. Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and non-ferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 1983;147:139-48.
13. Teitelbaum GP, Bradley WG, Klein BD. MR imaging artifacts, ferromagnetism and magnetic torque of intravascular filters, stents, and coils. Radiology 1988;166:657-64.
14. Dujovny M, Alp MS, Dujovny N, Zhao YJ, Gundamraj NR, Misra M, Dobben G. Aneurysm clips: magnetic quantification and magnetic resonance imaging safety. J Neurosurg 1997;87:788-94.