Ethos in chaos? Reaction to video files depicting socially harmful images in the channel 2 Japanese internet forum

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 1248-1268

  Kaigo, Muneo ^a   Watanabe, Isao ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

^b INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR; FREE ACCESS; IMAGE FILES; INTERNET BULLETIN BOARDS; INTERNET FORUMS; ONLINE ENVIRONMENTS; USER COMMUNITIES; VIDEO FILES;

CRIME;

EID: 34548249765     PISSN: 10836101     EISSN: 10836101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00372.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Buchstein, H 1997). Bytes that bite: The Internet and deliberative democracy. Constellations, 4 (2 248 263.
2. Buckingham, D 1993). Children Talking Television: The Making of Television Literacy. London : The Falmer Press.
3. Buckingham, D 1996). Moving Images: Understanding Children's Emotional Responses to Television. Manchester, UK : Manchester University Press.
4. Dahlberg, L 2001). The Internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication and Society, 4 (4 615 633.
5. Danet, B 2001). Cyberpl@y: Communicating Online. Oxford and New York : Berg.
6. Dentsu Communication Institute (2006). Jyouhou Media Hakusho2006 [White Paper on Information Media 2006]. Tokyo : Diamond.
7. Fraser, N 1992). Rethinking the public sphere : A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed Habermas and the Public Sphere (pp. 109 142). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
8. Gauntlett, D 1997). Video Critical: Children, the Environment and Media Power. Luton, UK : John Libbey Media.
9. Garnham, N 1992). The media and the public sphere. In C. Calhoun (Ed Habermas and the Public Sphere (pp. 359 376). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
10. Habermas, J 1974). The public sphere. New German Critique, 3 (Fall) in Webster, F Ed The Information Society Reader pp. 350 365). New York : Routledge.
11. Internet Kyoukai (2005). Internet Hakusho 2005 [White Paper on the Internet 2005 Tokyo : Impress.
12. Joinson, A. N 2003). Understanding the Psychology of Internet Behaviour: Virtual Worlds, Real Lives. Basingstoke, UK : Palgrave Macmillan.
13. Katz, J. E. Rice, R. E 2002). Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
14. Keane, J 1995). Structural transformations of the public sphere. Communication Review, 1 (1) 8 22.
15. Kraut, R., Lundmark, V., Patterson, M., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T. Scherlis, W 1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53 (9 1017 1031.
16. Mided, J 2000). The Internet and public sphere: What kind of space is cyberspace? In L. Lengel (Ed Culture and Technology in New Europe (pp. 63 75). Stamford, CT : Ablex.
17. Mooney, P 2004). Professor asks China to restore popular online forum at Peking U. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 51 (6 A43.
18. Negt, O. Kluge, A 1993). Public Sphere and Experience: Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere. Minneapolis, MN : University of Minnesota Press.
19. Onishi, N 2004, May 9). Japanese find a forum to vent most-secret feelings. The New York Times. Retrieved July 21, 2007 from http://query.nytimes. com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=technology&res=9F01E5DE153CF93AA35756C0A9629C8B63
20. Papacharissi, Z 2002). The virtual sphere: The Internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society, 4 (1 9 27.
21. Poster, M 1997). CyberDemocracy: Internet and the public sphere. In D. Porter (Ed Internet Culture (pp. 201 218). New York : Routledge.
22. Rutter, M 1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57 (3 316 331.
23. Ryan, M 1992). Gender and public access: Women's politics in nineteenth century America. In C. Calhoun (Ed Habermas and the Public Sphere (pp. 259 288). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
24. Sassi, S 2000). The controversies of the Internet and the revitalization of local political life. In K. L. Hacker J. Van Dijk (Eds Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice (pp. 90 104). London : Sage.
25. Schudson, M 1997). Why conversation is not the soul of democracy. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 14 (4 297 309.
26. Short, J., Williams, E. Christie, B 1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London : John Wiley.
27. Stoll, C 1995). Silicon Snake Oil. New York : Anchor Books.
28. Wallace, P 1999). The Psychology of the Internet. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
29. Walther, J. B 1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3 43.
30. Watanabe, I 2000). An Empirical Study of Violent Television Program Effects on Asocial Behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, International Christian University, Tokyo, Japan.
31. Yang, G 2003). The Internet and the rise of a transnational Chinese cultural sphere. Media, Culture & Society, 25 (4 469 490.