Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R &D

Science and Innovation: Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 109-146

  Cohen, Wesley M ^a   Nelson, Richard R ^b   Walsh, John P ^c  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548235862     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781781950241.00017     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Acs, Z.J., D.B. Audretsch and M.P. Feldman (1994), 'R&D spillovers and recipient firm size', Review of Economics and Statistics 76, 336-40.
2. Adams, J.D. (1990), 'Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth', Journal of Political Economy 98, 673-702.
3. Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) (1999), AUTM Licensing Survey, Fiscal Year 1999 Survey Summary, available at http://www. autm.net/surveys/99/survey99A.pdf - last accessed 30 April 2002.
4. Bernstein, J.I. and M.I. Nadiri (1989), 'Research and development and intraindustry spillovers: an empirical application of dynamic duality', Review of Economic Studies 56, 249-67.
5. Bowker Publishing (1994), Directory of American Research and Technology, New Providence, NJ.
6. Bush, V. (1945), Science: The Endless Frontier: A Report to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office (reprinted 1990, National Science Foundation).
7. Cohen, W.M., R. Florida, L. Randazzese and J. Walsh (1998), 'Industry and the Academy: uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance', in R. Noll (ed.), Challenges to Research Universities,Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 171-200.
8. Cohen,W.M. and S. Klepper (1996), 'A reprise of size and R&D', Economic Journal 106(July), 925-51.
9. Cohen,W.M., R.R. Nelson and J.Walsh (2000), 'Protecting their intellectual assets:appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not)', Working paper no. 7552, Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
10. de Solla Price, D. (1984), 'The science/technology relationship, the craft of experimental science, and policy for the improvement of high technology innovations', Research Policy 13(1), 3-20.
11. Faulkner,W. and J. Senker (1995), Knowledge Frontiers: Public Sector Research and Industrial Innovation in Biotechnology, Engineering Ceramics, and Parallel Computing, New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Feller, I. (1990), 'Universities as engines of R&D-based economic growth: they think they can', Research Policy 19(4), 335-48.
13. Gibbons, M. and R. Johnston (1975), 'The roles of science in technological innovation', Research Policy 3(3), 220-42.
14. Goto, A. (2000), 'Japan's national innovation system', Oxford Review of Economic Policy 16, 103-13.
15. Griliches, Z. (1992), 'The search for R&D spillovers', Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94(3, Supplement), 529-47.
16. Hounshell, D. (1996), 'The evolution of industrial research in the United States', in R.S. Rosenbloom and W.J. Spencer (eds), Engines of Innovation, Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press, pp. 13-86.
17. Jaffe, A. (1989), 'Real effects of academic research', American Economic Review 79(5), 957-70.
18. Jensen, R. and M. Thursby (2001), 'Proofs and prototypes for sale: the licensing of university inventions', American Economic Review 91(1), 240-59.
19. Klevorick, A.K., R. Levin, R.R. Nelson and S.Winter (1995), 'On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities', Research Policy 24(2), 195-205.
20. Kline, S.J. and N. Rosenberg (1986), 'An overview of innovation', in R. Landau and N. Rosenberg (eds), The Positive Sum Strategy, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 235-306.
21. Levin, R., A. Klevorick, R.R. Nelson and S.G. Winter (1987), 'Appropriating the returns from industrial R&D', Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (Special Issue), 783-820.
22. Link, A.L. and J. Rees (1990), 'Firm size, university based research, and the returns to R&D', Small Business Economics 2, 25-31.
23. Mansfield, E. (1991), 'Academic research and industrial innovation', Research Policy 20(1), 1-12.
24. Mazzoleni, R. and R.R. Nelson (1998), 'Economic theories about the benefits and costs of patents', Journal of Economic Issues 32(4), 1031-52.
25. Mowery, D.C., R.R. Nelson, B.N. Sampat and A.A. Ziedonis (2000), 'The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980', Research Policy 30(1), 99-118.
26. Mowery, D.C. and N. Rosenberg (1979), 'The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies', Research Policy 8(2), 102-53.
27. Narin, F., K.S. Hamilton and D. Olivastro (1997), 'The increasing link between US technology and public science', Research Policy 26(3), 317-30.
28. National Science Board (NSB) (1998), Science and Engineering Indicators - 1998, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
29. National Science Board (NSB) (2000), Science and Engineering Indicators - 2000, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
30. Nelson, R.R. (1986), 'Institutions supporting technical advance in industry', American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 76, 186-9.
31. Nelson, R.R. (1990), 'Capitalism as an engine of progress', Research Policy 19(3), 193-214.
32. Rosenberg,N. (1992), 'Scientific instrumentation and university research', Research Policy 21(4), 381-90.
33. Rosenberg, N. and R.R. Nelson (1994), 'American universities and technical advance in industry', Research Policy 23(3), 323-48.
34. Thursby, J.G. and M.C. Thursby (2001), 'Industry perspectives on licensing university technologies: sources and problems', Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers 12, available at: www.autm.net/pubs/journal/00.
35. von Hippel, E. (1988), The Sources of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Walsh, J.P. and T. Bayma (1996), 'Computer networks and scientific work', Social Studies of Science 26(3), 661-703.