Incidence and risk factors of acute radial artery occlusion following transradial percutaneous coronary intervention

National Medical Journal of China

Volumn 87, Issue 22, 2007, Pages 1531-1534

  Zhou, Yu Jie ^a   Zhao, Ying Xin ^b   Cao, Zheng ^b   Fu, Xiang Hua ^b   Nie, Bin ^b   Liu, Yu Yang ^b   Guo, Yong He ^b   Cheng, Wan Jun ^b   Jia, De An ^b  

^a CAPITAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Hydrophilic sheath; Percutaneous transcoronary intervention; Radial artery occlusion

Indexed keywords

ANTICOAGULANT AGENT; HEPARIN;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; AGED; ANTICOAGULATION; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIMARY PREVENTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; RISK REDUCTION; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; CHINA; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIAL ARTERY; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 34548228919     PISSN: 03762491     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Prull MW, Brandts B, Rust H, et al. Vascular complications of percutaneous transradial coronary angiography and coronary intervention. Med Klin, 2005,100:377-382.
2. Stella PR, Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, et al. Incidence and outcome of radial artery occlusion following trans-radial artery coronary angioplasty Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1997,40:156-158.
3. Aptecar E, Pernes JM, Chabane-Chaouch M, et al. Transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary angioplasty: The PCVI-CUBA study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2006, 67:711-720.
4. Dahm JB, Vogelgesang D, Hummel A, et al. A randomized trial of 5 vs. 6 French transradial percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2002, 57:172-176.
5. Kikuchi Y, Endou N, Terashima M, et al. Incidence of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary intervetion in the Japanese population. Jpn J Interv Cardiol, 2000, 15:343-347.
6. Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv, 1999, 46:173-178.
7. Kiemeneij F, Fraser D, Slagboom T, et al. Hydrophilic coating aids radial sheath withdrawal and reduces patient discomfort following transradial coronary intervention: a randomized double-blind comparison of coated and uncoated sheaths. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2003, 59:161-164.
8. Saito S, Tanaka S, Hiroe Y, et al. Usefulness of hydrophilic coating on arterial sheath introducer in transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2002, 56: 328-332.
9. Spaulding C, Lefevre T, Funck F, et al. Left radial approach for coronary angiography: results of a prospective study. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1996, 39: 365-370.
10. Guillard N, Lefevre, Spaulding C, Funck F, et al. Coronary angiography by left radial approach. A bi-center prospective pilot study. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss, 1997, 90: 1349-1355.
11. Bazemore E, Mann JT. Problems and complications of the transradial approach for coronary interventions: a review. J Invasive Cardiol, 2005, 17:156-159.