Problems and complications of the transradial approach for coronary interventions: A review

Journal of Invasive Cardiology

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 156-159

  Bazemore, Elizabeth ^a   Mann III, J Tift ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLYCERYL TRINITRATE; HEPARIN; THROMBIN; VERAPAMIL;

ABSCESS; ARTERY INJURY; ARTERY INTIMA PROLIFERATION; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTERY SPASM; AVULSION INJURY; BLEEDING; COMPARTMENT SYNDROME; DIABETES MELLITUS; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECT; FALSE ANEURYSM; FASCIOTOMY; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR PROCEDURE; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RADIAL ARTERY; REVIEW; VASCULAR DISEASE; BALLOON DILATATION; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; METHODOLOGY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION;

BALLOON DILATATION; CORONARY STENOSIS; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RADIAL ARTERY;

EID: 18444418819     PISSN: 10423931     EISSN: 15572501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Kiemeneij F, Laarman G. Transradial artery coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 1995;129:1-8.
2. Mann T, Cubeddu G, Bowen J, et al. Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: a comparison of radial versus femoral access sites. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:572-576.
3. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GH, Odekerken D, et al. A randomized comparison of percutaneous translumenal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial, and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1269-1275.
4. Mann T, Cowper PA, Peterson ED, et al. Transradial coronary stenting: Comparison with femoral access closed wit an arterial suture device. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2000;49:150-156.
5. Hildick-Smith DJR, Lowe MD, Walsh JT, et al. Coronary angiography from the radial artery: experience, complications and limitations. Int J Cardiol 1998;64:231-239.
6. Louvard Y, Lefevre T, Allain A, Morice M. Coronary angiography through the radial or femoral approach: the CARAFE study. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;52:181-187.
7. Lotan C, Hasin Y, Mosseri M, et al. Trans-radial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:164-167.
8. Barbeau G, Carrier G, Ferland S, et al. Right trans-radial approach for coronary procedures: preliminary results. J Invas Cardiol 1996;8:19D-21D.
9. Hildick-Smith DJR, Walsh JT, Lowe MD, et al. Transradial coronary angiography in patients with contraindications to the femoral approach: An analysis of 500 cases. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2004;61:60-66.
10. Cooper CJ, El-Shiekh RA, Blaesng LD, et al. Patient preference for cardiac catheterization via the transfemoral approach [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29(Suppl A):310A.
11. Barbeau GR, Arsenault F, Dugas L, et al. Evolution of the ulnopalmar arterial arches with pulse oximetery and plethyslmography: Comparison. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:34A.
12. Lefevre T, Thebault B, Spauldng C, et al. Radial approach patency after percutaneous left radial artery approach for coronary angiography. The role of heparin. Eur Heart J 1995;16:293.
13. Stella PR, Kiemeneij F, Laarman GH, et al. Incidence and outcome of radial artery occlusion following transradial coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1 997;40:1 56-158.
14. Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 1999;46:173-178.
15. Mandel MA, Dauchot PJ. Radial artery cannulation in 1,000 patients: Precautions and complications. J Hand Surg 1977;2:482-485.
16. Yoo B, Lee S, Ko J, et al. Procedural outcomes of repeated transradial coronary procedure. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2003;58:301-304.
17. Wakeyama T, Ogawa H, Iida H, et al. Intima-media thickening of the radial artery after intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1109-1114.
18. He G, Yang C. Characteristics of adrenoreceptors in the human radial artery: Clinical implications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:1136-1141.
19. He G. Verapamil plus nitroglycerin solution maximally preserves endothelial function of the radial artery: Comparison with papaverine solution. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:1321-1327.
20. Kiemeneij F, Fraser D, Slagboom T, et al. Hydrophilic coating aids radial sheath withdrawal and reduces patient discomfort following coronary intervention: A randomized double-blind comparison of coated and uncoated sheath. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2003;59:161-164.
21. Louvard Y, Lefèvre T. Loops and transradial approach in coronary diagnosis and intervention. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2000;51:250-252.
22. Phillipe F, Larrazet F, Meziane T, Dibie A. Comparison of transradial vs. transfemoral approach in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction with primary angioplasty and abciximab. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2004;61:67-73.
23. Barbeau GR. Radial loop and extreme vessel tortuosity in the transradial approach: advantage of hydrophilic-coated guidewires and catheters. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2003;59:442-450.
24. Subramanian R, White C, Sternbergh CW, et al. Nonhealing wound resulting from a foreign-body reaction to a radial arterial sheath. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2003;59:205-206.