Development and evaluation of evidence-based nursing (EBN) filters and related databases

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 104-115

  Lavin, Mary A ^a   Krieger, Mary M ^b   Meyer, Geralyn A ^a   Spasser, Mark A ^c,d   Cvitan, Tome ^e   Reese, Cordie G ^a   Carlson, Judith H ^a   Perry, Anne G ^f   McNary, Patricia ^g  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

^b SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Library and Information Services

^d Barnes Jewish College   (United States)

^e Alumni Hall ^*  (Sweden)

^f SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY EDWARDSVILLE   (United States)

^g MASSACHUSETTS COLLEGE OF PHARMACY AND HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; DATA BASE; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDLINE; METHODOLOGY; NURSING; PUBLICATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ARTICLE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INSTRUMENTATION; LINGUISTICS; NOMENCLATURE; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PUBMED; TERMINOLOGY; UNITED STATES; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 18344382231     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. 114-1 15 1. UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LIBRARIES, CENTRE FOR EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE. Practising EBM. [Web document]. 2004. [cited 22 May 2004]. .
2. JENICEK M. Clinical case reporting in evidence-based medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2001.
3. McKIBBON KA, EADY A, MARKS S. PDQ: evidence-based principles and practice. Hamilton, ON, Canada: B. C. Decker, 1999.
4. NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE. PubMed's Clinical Queries research methodology filters. [Web document], [cited 22 May 2004]. .
5. HAYNES RB, WILCZYNSKI NL (Hedges Team). Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: analytical survey. [Web document]. BMJ 2004;328(7447). Available from: . [cited 11 May 2004].
6. WILCZYNSKI NL, HAYNES RB. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound causation studies in MEDLINE. Proc AMIA Annu Symp 2003:719-23.
7. WILCZYNSKI NL, HAYNES RB. Robustness of empirical search strategies for clinical content in MEDLINE. Proc AMIA Annu Symp 2002:904-8.
8. HAYNES RB, WILCZYNSKI N, McKIBBON KA, WALKER CJ, SINCLAIR JC. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994 Nov-Dec;1(6):447-58.
9. WILCZYNSKI NL, WALKER CJ, MCKIBBON KA, HAYNES RB. Assessment of methodologic search filters in MEDLINE. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1993:601-5.
10. EDWARD G. MINER LIBRARY. Evidence-based filters for Ovid MEDLINE [Nesbit guide to evidence based resources]. [Web document]. 2004. [cited 22 May 2004]. .
11. EDWARD G. MINER LIBRARY. Evidence based filters for Ovid CINAHL [Nesbit guide to evidence based resources]. [Web document]. 2004 [cited 22 May 2004]. .
12. GLOVER J. Finding the evidence on PubMed. [Web document]. 2004. [rev. 4 Feb 2002; cited 22 May 2004]. .
13. DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER LIBRARY. Evidence based medicine: filters/strategies for Ovid Medline [Web document]. 1998 [rev. 14 Oct 1998; cited 22 May 2004]. .
14. OXFORD-CENTRE FOR EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE. Searching for the best evidence in clinical journals. [Web document]. [cited 22 May 2004]. .
15. LIBRARY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES PEORIA, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO. Evidence-based medicine: finding the best clinical literature: is all evidence created equal? [Web document]. 2004. [rev. 2 Dec 2003; cited 13 May 2004]. .
16. MURPHY SA. Research methodology search filters: are they effective for locating research for evidence-based veterinary medicine in PubMed? J Med Libr Assoc 2003 Oct; 91(4):484-9.
17. MURPHY SA. Applying methodological search filters to CAB Abstracts to identify research for evidence-based veterinary medicine. J Med Libr Assoc 2002 Oct;90(4):406-10.
18. WARD D, MEADOWS S. Family practice network is an opportunity for expert searchers. MLA News 2003;360:1,12.
19. HARDIN LIBRARY FOR THE HEALTH SCIENCES. Evidence-based nursing filters (CINAHL). [Web document]. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa, 2004. [rev. 23 Feb 2004; cited 13 May 2004]. .
20. SARANTO K, TALLBERG M. Enhancing evidence-based practice-a controlled vocabulary for nursing practice and research. Int J Med Inf 2003;70:249-53.
21. LAVIN MA, MEYER G, KRIEGER M, McNARY P, CARLSON J, PERRY A, JAMES D, CVITAN T. Essential differences between evidence-based nursing and evidence based medicine. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif 2002;13(3):101-6.
22. GEBBIE KM, LAVIN MA. Classification of nursing diagnoses: proceedings. St. Louis, MO: Mosby 1975.
23. NORTH AMERICAN NURSING DIAGNOSIS ASSOCIATION. NANDA nursing diagnoses: definitions and classification 2001-2002. Philadelphia, PA: The Association, 2001.
24. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF STATE BOARDS OF NURSING. Model nurse practice act, article ii, section 2b. [Web document]. (2002). [cited 27 Aug 2004]. .
25. AMERICAN NURSES ASSOCIATION. Nursing: scope and standards of practice. Washington, DC: American Nurses Association, 2004.
26. AMERICAN NURSES ASSOCIATION. Nursing's social policy statement. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Nurses Association, 2003.
27. COHEN AM, STAVRI PZ, HERSH WR. A categorization and analysis of the criticisms of evidence-based medicine. Int J Med Inf 2004 Feb;73(1):35-43.
28. NANDA nursing diagnoses: definitions and classification, 2003-2004. Philadelphia, PA: Nursecom, 2003.
29. NIGHTINGALE F. A contribution to the sanitary history of the British army during the late war with Russia. London, UK: Harrison, 1859.
30. HALLORAN EJ, WELTON JM, ENGLEBARDT SP, THORSON MW. A comparison of nursing and medical diagnoses in predicting hospital outcomes. Proc AMIA Symp, 1999:171-5.
31. CENTRE FOR EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE, UNIVERSITY NETWORK-MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL, UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LIBRARIES. Glossary of EBM terms. [Web document]. 2004. [cited 22 May 2004]. .
32. CENTRE FOR EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, OXFORD UNIVERSITY. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. [Web document]. Oxford, UK: Oxford University, [cited 22 May 2004]. .
33. LYONS SS, SPECHT JKP. Prompted voiding for persons with urinary incontinence. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Gerontological Nursing Interventions Research Center, Research Dissemination Core, 1999.
34. FOLKEDAHL BA, FRANTZ RA. Prevention of pressure ulcers. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Gerontological Nursing Interventions Research Center, Research Dissemination Core, 2002.
35. HODGINS C, MOSLEY M, POLA-STROWD M. Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin, School of Nursing, 2003.
36. CESARIO S, MORIN K, SANTA-DONATO A. Evaluating the level of evidence of qualitative research. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2002;31(6):708-14.
37. CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES. December 2002 revised long term care resident assessment instrument user's manual for the minimum data set (MDS) version 2.0. [Web document]. [Dec 2002]. [rev. 23 Apr 2004; cited 22 May 2004]. .
38. JOHNSON M, MOORHEAD S, MAAS M. Nursing outcomes classification (NOC). St. Louis, MO: Mosby 2000.
39. MOORHEAD S, JOHNSON M. Diagnostic-specific outcomes and nursing effectiveness research. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif (2004);15(2):49-57.
40. WILCYZNSKI NL, WALER CJ, McKIBBON KA, HAYNES RB. Quantitative comparison of pre-explosions and subheading with methodologic search terms in MEDLINE. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1994:905-9.
41. McKIBBON KA. Telephone communication, May 2002.