Usability and usage of iTV services: Lessons learned in an Austrian field trial

Computers in Entertainment

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2007, Pages

  Bernhaupt, Regina ^a   Obrist, Marianna ^a   Tscheligi, Manfred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

Author keywords

Interactivity; iTV services; MHP; Usability issues

Indexed keywords

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; MULTIMEDIA SERVICES; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER; USABILITY ENGINEERING; USER INTERFACES;

INTERACTIVITY; MULTIMEDIA HOME PLATFORM (MHP); USABILITY ISSUES;

VIDEO ON DEMAND;

EID: 34548212341     PISSN: 15443574     EISSN: 15443981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1279540.1279546     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. BBCi. 2002. Interactive television style guide, http://www.bbc.co.uk/ commissioning/newmedia/itv.shtml.
2. BERNHAUPT, R., PLODERER, B. AND TSCHELIGI. M. 2005. Relevance of prior experience in MHP-based interactive TV services. In Interact 2005, LNCS 3585, M.F. Costabile and F. Paterno (eds.), 1149-1152.
3. BROADBANDBANANAS. 2005. http://www.broadbandbananas.com.
4. CHOI, H., CHOI, M., KIM. J., AND YU, H. 2003. An empirical study on the adoption of information appliances with a focus on interactive TV. Telematics and Informatics 20, 161-183.
5. CHORIANOPOULOS, K. 2004. Virtual television channels: Conceptual model, user interface design and affective usability evaluation, Ph.D dissertation, Athens University of Economics and Business.
6. CUNNINGHAM, B. 2003. Interacting with your television: Key lessons from the UK. http://www.broadbandban.anas.com/ben.html
7. ERONEN, L. 2003. User centered research for interactive television. In EuroiTV'03 Proceedings of the First European Conference on Interactive Television, 5-12.
8. GAWLINSKI, M. 2003. Interactive Television Production. Oxford: Focal Press.
9. GOERTZ, L. 2004. Rahmenbedingungen für eine Definition des interaktiven Fernsehens, In: Zu Salm, Christiane: Zaubermaschine interaktives Fernsehen? TV-Zukunft zwischen .Blütenträumen und Businessmodellen, Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler, Wiesbaden.
10. HEDMAN, A. 2002. A media rich interface vs a simple interface for interactive television, http://cid.nada.kth.se/pdf/CTu-212.pdf.
11. HERINGSTAD, D. AND WLCHANSKY, A. 1998. Designing user interfaces for television. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 98), ACM, New York, 165-166.
12. LAMONT, S. 2003. An 8-step process for creating compelling enhanced television. EuroiTV'03 Proceedings of the First European Conference on Interactive Television, 133-136.
13. MCDONALDS, S. 1995. Learning from diversity: Interactive TV, computers, and the frontier of the cognitive sciences. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 95), ACM, New York, 197.
14. PEMBERTON, L. AND GRIFFITHS, R. N. 2003. Evaluation techniques for interactive television. In Proceedings of the HCI International Conference (Crete).
15. QUICO, C. 2003. Are communication services the killer applications for interactive TV? Or "I left my wife because I am in love with the TV set." In EuroiTV'03. Proceedings of the First European Conference on Interactive TV, 99-107.
16. SERCO USABILITY SERVICES. 2001. Interactive TV and electronic programming guides: Usability guidelines. http://usability. serco.com/research/research.htm.
17. STATISTIK AUSTRIA. 2004. IKT-Einsatz in Haushalten. Statistik, Wien.
18. TEASLEY, B., LUND, A., AND BENNETT, R. 1996. Interactive television a new challenge for HCI. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'96), ACM, New York, 356.
19. VAN DEN BROECK, W., PIERSON, J., AND PAUWELS, C 2004. Does interactive television imply new uses? A Flemish case study. In EuroiTV'04. Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Interactive TV, 101-112.
20. VORDERER, P. 2000. Interactive entertainment and beyond. In Media Entertainment: The Psychology of its Appeal. D. Zillman and P. Vorderer (eds.), Lawrence Earlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.