Factors influencing the acceptance of nature conservation measures-A qualitative study in Switzerland

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 66-79

  Schenk, Anita ^a   Hunziker, Marcel ^a   Kienast, Felix ^a  

^a SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Acceptance; Cultivation contract; Nature conservation measures; Qualitative methods

Indexed keywords

CULTIVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION; LANDSCAPE; NATURE CONSERVATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; LANDSCAPE; LAW; MOTIVATION; SOCIAL STATUS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; SWITZERLAND;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; SWITZERLAND;

EID: 33846131227     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.01.010     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Aerni Ph. Public Acceptance of Transgenic Rice and its Potential Impact on Future Rice Markets in Southeast Asian Countries (1999), ETH, Zürich
2. Alphandery P., and Fortier A. Can a territorial policy be based on science alone? The system for creating the Natura 2000 network in France. Sociologia Ruralis 41 (2001) 311
3. Bandara R., and Tisdell C. Comparison of rural and urban attitudes to the conservation of Asian elephants in Sri Lanka: empirical evidence. Biological Conservation 110 (2003) 327-342
4. In: Baum E., Wolff P., and Zobisch M. (Eds). Acceptance of Soil and Water Conservation Strategies and Technologies (1993), DITSL, Germany
5. Blumer H. Der methodologische Standort des Symbolischen Interaktionismus. In: Burkart R., and Hömberger W. (Eds). Kommunikationstheorien: ein Textbuch zur Einführung (1992), Wilhelm Braumüller Universitäts-Verlagsbuchhandlung GmbH, Wien 23-40
6. Brehm J.W. A Theory of Psychological Reactance (1966), Academic Press, New York
7. Buchecker M., Hunziker M., and Kienast F. Participatory landscape development: overcoming social barriers to public involvement. Landscape and Urban Planning 64 (2003) 29-46
8. Deblitz C., Buller H., Rohm O., Schramek J., and Wilson GA. Implementation and acceptance of agri-environmental schemes in the EU member states. Berichte über Landwirtschaft 76 (1998) 55-73
9. Drijever Ca. People's participation in environmental projects in developing countries. Landscape and Urban Planning 20 (1991) 129-139
10. Döhl W. Akzeptanz innovativer Technologie in Büro und Verwaltung: Grundlagen, Analyse und Gestaltung (1983), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen
11. Gardner G.T., and Stern P.C. Environmental Problems and Human Behaviour (1996), Allyn & Bacon, Needham height MA
12. Habermas J. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns Band 1, Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung (1997), Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main
13. Harrison C.M., Burgess J., and Clark J. Discounted knowledges: farmers' and residents' understandings of nature conservation goals and policies. Journal of Environmental Management 54 (1998) 305-320
14. Heiland S. Voraussetzungen erfolgreichen Naturschutzes-Individuelle und gesellschaftliche Bedingungen umweltgerechten Verhaltens, ihre Bedeutung für den Naturschutz und die Durchsetzbarkeit seiner Ziele (1999), ecomed verlagsgeselsschaft AG&Co., Landsberg
15. Hens L., and Boon Ek. Institutional, legal, and economic instruments in Ghana's environmental policy. Environmental Management 24 (1999) 337-351
16. Holst H. Nature conservation and landscape management advice-The integration of nature conservation and landscape management into "goodfarming practice" as a future task. Berichte über Landwirtschaft 79 (2001) 552-564
17. Hubacher, M., 2000. Die Akzeptanz des Hüftprotektors bei zu Hause lebenden Senioren ab 70 Jahren. BfU Bern.
18. Hunziker M. The spontaneous reafforestation in abandoned agricultural lands: perception and aesthetic assessment by locals and tourists. Landscape and Urban Planning 31 (1995) 399-410
19. Kachele H., and Dabbert S. An economic approach for a better understanding of conflicts between farmers and nature conservationists-an application of the decision support system MODAM to the Lower Odra Valley National Park. Agricultural Systems 74 (2002) 241-255
20. Krebs, St., 1992. Ansaat autochthoner Wildkräuter zur Biotopentwicklung in intensiv genutzten Agrarlandschaften. Hohenheim.
21. Lamnek S. Qualitative Sozialforschung Band 1 Methodologie (1988), Psychologie Verlags Union, München
22. Lamnek S. Qualitative Sozialforschung Band 2 Methoden und Techniken (1989), Psychologie Verlags Union, München
23. Lucke D. Akzeptanz: Legitimität in der 'Abstimmungsgesellschaft' (1995), Leske und Buderich, Opladen
24. Lutz M., and Bastian O. Implementation of landscape planning and nature conservation in the agricultural landscape-a case study from Saxony. Agriculture Ecosystems &Environment 92 (2002) 159-170
25. Luz F. Zur Akzeptanz landschaftsplanerischer Projekte (1994), Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main
26. Marren P. Nature Conservation. A Review of the Conservation of Wildlife in Britain 1950-2001 (2002), Harper Collins Publishers, London
27. McLean J., and Straede S. Conservation, relocation, and the paradigms of park and people management-a case study of Padampur Villages and the Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Society & Natural Resources 16 (2003) 509-526
28. McNeely J.A. Expanding Partnerships in Conservation (1995), Island Press, Washington, DC
29. Mead GH. Geist, Identität und Gesellschaft: aus der Sicht des Sozialbehaviourismus (1968), Suhrkamp, Frankfurt
30. Pfadenhauer J. Some remarks on the socio-cultural background of restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 9 (2001) 220-229
31. Pongratz H. Die Bauern und der ökologische Diskurs: Befunde und Thesen zum Umweltbewusstsein in der bundesdeutschen Landwirtschaft (1992), Profil Verlag GmbH, München
32. Pouta E., Rekola M., Kuuluvainen J., Li C., and Tahvonen I. Willingness to pay in different policy-planning methods: insights into respondents' decision-making processes. Ecological Economics 40 (2002) 295-311
33. Rentsch G. Die Akzeptanz eines Schutzgebietes, untersucht am Beispiel der Einstellung der lokalen Bevölkerung zum Nationalpark Bayrischer Wald (1988), Verlag Michael Lassleben, Kallmünz / Regensburg
34. Richards T., and Richards L. Using Computers in Qualitative Research. In: Denzin N., and Lincoln Y. (Eds). Handbook of Qualitative Research (1994), Sage Publications, London
35. Roux M. Lernprozesse fördern für eine nachhaltige Landwirtschaft in Kulturlandschaften der Schweiz (1997), Landwirtschaftliche Beratungszentrale Lindau, Zürich
36. Schenk A., 2000. Relevante Faktoren der Akzeptanz von Natur- und Landschaftsschutzmassnahmen. Ergebnisse qualitativer Fallstudien. Ostschweizer Geographische Gesellschaft St. Gallen. Heft 5.
37. Schuster, K., 2003. Lebenstil und Akzeptanz von Naturschutz. Wege zu einer lebensstilbezogenen Naturschutzkommunikation. Asanger Verlag, Heidelberg, Kröning.
38. Seeland K. National Park policy and wildlife problems in Nepal and Bhutan. Population and Environment 22 (2000) 43-62
39. Slater R. Between a rock and a hard place: contested livelihoods in Qwaqwa National Park, South Africa. Geographical Journal 168 (2002) 116-129
40. Stoll, S., 1999. Akzeptanzprobleme bei der Ausweisung von Grossschutz-gebieten. Ursachenanalyse und Ansätze zu Handlungsansätzen. Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften, Frankfurt am Main.
41. Stoll-Kleemann S. Barriers to nature conservation in Germany: a model explaining opposition to protected areas. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21 (2001) 369-385
42. Straede, S., Helles, F., 2000. Park-people conflict resolution in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal: buying time at high cost? Environmental Conservation 27, 368-381.
43. Strauss, A. 1991. Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung: Datenanalyse und Theoriebildung in der empirischen soziologischen Forschung. Fink München.
44. Strauss A., and Corbin J. Grounded Theory: Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung (1996), Psychologie Verlag, Weinheim
45. Terstad J. Swedish experiences of incentives for the protection of nature. Science of the Total Environment 240 (1996) 189-196
46. Tonder M., and Jurvelius J. Attitudes towards fishery and conservation of the ringed seal in Lake Pihlajavesi, Finland. Environmental Conservation 31 (2004) 122-129
47. Turnhout E., Hisschemoller M., and Eusackers H. The role of views of nature in Dutch nature conservation: the case of the creation of a drift sand area in the Hoge Veluwe National Park. Environmental Values 13 (2004) 187-198
48. Uliczka H., Angelstam P., Jansson G., and Bro A. Non-industrial private forest owners' knowledge of and attitudes towards nature conservation. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 19 (2004) 274-288
49. Van der Meulen H., deSnoo G., and Wossink G. Farmers' perception of unsprayed crop edges in the Netherlands. Environmental Management 47 (1996) 241-255
50. Volz Kr. Due and undue demands for species protection programs in the forest. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 111 (1992) 243-254
51. Weber N., and Christophersen T. The influence of non-governmental organisations on the creation of Natura 2000 during the European Policy process. Forest Policy and Economics 4 (2002) 1-12
52. Williams Ae., and Moss B. Angling and conservation at Sites of Special Scientific Interest in England: economics, attitudes and impacts. Aquatic conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 11 (2001) 357-372
53. Witzel A. Das problemzentrierte Interview. In: Jüttemann G. (Ed). Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie (1985), Beltz Verlag, Weinheim 227-259