Identifying linear and non-linear behaviour in reduced complexity modelling output using surrogate data methods

Geomorphology

Volumn 90, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 356-366

  Keylock, C J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Delay coordinate embedding; Model validation; Reduced complexity modelling; State space analysis; Surrogates; Wavelets

Indexed keywords

GEOMORPHOLOGY; MODEL VALIDATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; SURROGATE METHOD; WAVELET;

EID: 34548187770     PISSN: 0169555X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.027     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Andrzejak R.G., Lehnertz K., Mormann F., Rieke C., David P., and Elger C.E. Indications of nonlinear deterministic and finite-dimensional structures in time series of brain electrical activity: dependence on recording region and brain state. Physical Review E 64 (2001) 061907
2. Barbolini M., Gruber U., Keylock C.J., Naaim N., and Savi F. Application of statistical and hydraulic-continuum dense-snow avalanche models to 5 real European sites. Cold Regions Science and Technology 31 (2000) 133-149
3. Coulthard T.J., Macklin M.G., and Kirkby M.J. A cellular model of Holocene upland river basin and alluvial fan evolution. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 27 (2002) 269-288
4. Dodov B., and Foufoula-Georgiou E. Generalized hydraulic geometry: derivation based on a multiscaling formalism. Water Resources Research 40 (2004) W12201 10.1029/2004WR003196
5. Doeschel-Wilson A.B., and Ashmore P.E. Assessing a numerical cellular braided stream model with a physical model. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 30 (2005) 519-540
6. Donoho D.L., and Johnstone I.M. Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika 81 (1994) 425-455
7. Fisher M.E. Renormalization group theory: its basis and formulation in statistical physics. Reviews of Modern Physics 70 (1998) 653-681
8. Gilbert G.K. The convexity of hillslopes. Journal of Geology 17 (1909) 344-350
9. Gomez B., and Church M. An assessment of bed load sediment transport formulae for gravel bed rivers. Water Resources Research 25 (1989) 1161-1186
10. Grassberger P., and Procaccia I. Characterization of strange attractors. Physical Review Letters 50 (1983) 346-349
11. Hankin B.G., Hardy R., Kettle H., and Beven K.J. Using CFD in a GLUE framework to model the flow and dispersion characteristics of a natural fluvial dead zone. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 26 (2001) 667-687
12. Hardy R.J., Lane S.N., Lawless M.R., Best J.L., Elliott L., and Ingham D.B. Development and testing of a numerical code for treatment of complex river channel topography in three-dimensional CFD models with structured grids. Journal of Hydraulic Research 43 (2005) 1-13
13. Howard A.D., Dietrich W.E., and Seidl M.A. Modelling fluvial erosion on regional to continental scales. Journal of Geophysical Research 99 (1994) 13971-13986
14. Keylock C.J. Constrained surrogate time series with preservation of the mean and variance structure. Physical Review E 73 (2006) 036707
15. Keylock C.J. A wavelet-based method for surrogate data generation. Physica, D 225 (2007) 219-228
16. Keylock C.J., Hardy R.J., Parsons D.R., Ferguson R.I., Lane S.N., and Richards K.S. The theoretical foundations and potential for large-eddy simulation (LES) in fluvial geomorphic and sedimentological research. Earth-Science Reviews 71 (2005) 271-304
17. Lane S.N., Richards K.S., and Chandler J.H. Distributed sensitivity analysis in modelling environmental systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A 447 (1994) 49-63
18. Leopold L.B., and Maddock T. The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper vol. 252 (1953) 56 pp.
19. Moeckel R., and Murray B. Measuring the distance between time series. Physica D 102 (1997) 187-194
20. Murray A.B. From strange attractors to real-world data: evaluating a bedform model by measuring the distance between state-space plots. Mathematical Geology 33 (2001) 193-200
21. Murray A.B. Contrasting the goals, strategies, and predictions associated with simplified numerical models and detailed simulations. In: Iverson R.M., and Wilcock P.R. (Eds). Prediction in Geomorphology (2003), AGU Geophysical Monograph, Washington 151-165
22. Murray A.B., and Paola C. A cellular model of braided rivers. Nature 371 (1994) 54-57
23. Murray A.B., and Paola C. A new quantitative test of geomorphic models, applied to a model of braided streams. Water Resources Research 32 (1996) 2579-2587
24. Murray A.B., and Paola C. Properties of a cellular braided stream model. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 22 (1997) 1001-1025
25. Sapozhnikov V.B., Murray A.B., Paola C., and Foufoula-Geogiou E. Validation of braided-stream models: spatial state-space plots, self-affine scaling, and island shapes. Water Resources Research 34 (1998) 2353-2364
26. Schreiber T., and Schmitz A. Improved surrogate data for nonlinearity tests. Physical Review Letters 77 4 (1996) 635-638
27. Seidl M.A., and Dietrich W.E. The problem of channel erosion into bedrock. Catena Supplementband 23 (1992) 101-124
28. Small M. Applied Nonlinear Time-Series Analysis: Applications in Physics, Physiology and Finance. World Scientific Series on Nonlinear Science vol. 52 (2005) 251 pp.
29. Small M., Yu D., and Harrison R.G. Surrogate test for pseudoperiodic time series data. Physical Review Letters 87 (2001) 188101
30. Snyder N.P., Whipple K.X., Tucker G.E., and Merritts D.J. Landscape response to tectonic forcing: digital elevation model analysis of stream profiles in the Mendocino triple junction region, northern California. Geological Society of America Bulletin 112 (2000) 1250-1263
31. Theiler J., and Prichard D. Constrained realization Monte-Carlo method for hypothesis testing. Physica D 94 (1996) 221-235
32. Theiler J., Eubank S., Longtin A., Galdrikian B., and Farmer J.D. Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data. Physica D 58 (1992) 77-94
33. Thomas R., and Nicholas A.P. Simulation of braided river flow using a new cellular routing scheme. Geomorphology 43 (2002) 179-195
34. Tucker G.E., and Slingerland R.L. Drainage basin response to climate change. Water Resources Research 33 (1997) 2031-2047
35. Tucker G.E., and Whipple K.X. Topographic outcomes predicted by stream erosion models: sensitivity analysis and intermodel comparison. Journal of Geophysical Research 107 (2002) 1-16 10.1029/2001JB000162
36. Werner B.T. Complexity in natural landform patterns. Science 284 (1999) 102-104
37. Whipple K.X., and Tucker G.E. Dynamics of the stream power river incision model: implications for height limits of mountain ranges, landscape response timescales and research needs. Journal of Geophysical Research 104 (1999) 17661-17674
38. Whipple K.X., and Tucker G.E. Implications of sediment-flux dependent river incision models for landscape evolution. Journal of Geophysical Research 107 (2002) 1-20 10.1029/2000JB000044
39. Willgoose G.R. A physical explanation for an observed area-slope-elevation relationship for catchments with declining relief. Water Resources Research 30 (1994) 151-159
40. Willgoose G.R., Bras R.L., and Rodriguez-Iturbe I. A physical explanation of an observed link area-slope relationship. Water Resources Research 27 (1991) 1697-1702
41. Yang C.T., Song C.C.S., and Woldenberg M.J. Hydraulic geometry and minimum rate of energy dissipation. Water Resources Research 17 (1981) 1014-1018